Protecting Attorney Client Privilege and when a certain City Hall somewhere in America attempts to interfere in that privilege
Can you imagine an attorney saying something to another attorney to smear a client?
How grossly unethical! How unfair! How malicious, one of the elements of criminal harassment.
Gee, wonder if there is evidence out there of some malicious attorney attempting such a stunt to be vindictive and inflict emotional distress on a resident during a classic hate campaign that so many in a certain city in America appear to have suffered, women named Doreen and Lisa, men named Pat and Joe, or a guy with a dash cam being humiliated until he gets the upper hand....golly gee, what kind of sick city would attempt smears like that?
8:22 am
|
Inducing a Breach of Attorney-Client Relationship
In the recent case of Jackson v. Traveler's Insurance Co.,
the
Federal
District Court
for
the
Middle District
of
Tennessee
stated:
"While
the
law does
not
bind
a
client to
an
attorney
merely
because
[the
client]
has
entered
into
a contingent
fee
contract,
the
court
will
vigorously
protect
the
contractual relationship
when
a
third
party
wilfully
interferes with
this
relationship
by
inducing
the
plaintiff-client
to
discharge
[his]
attorney
and settle
with
the
third
party."'