758,039 POLICE HURT CITIZENS WITH FALSE ACCUSATIONS

758,057 @ 2:06 PM
758,039@1:48 PM

IT COULD HAPPEN IN MEDFORD!
MAYBE IT HAS ALREADY!

one set of rules for law enforcement 

one set of rules for their victims.
_______________________________

Man falsely connected to the shooting by Dallas police is now getting ‘thousands’ of death threats

 

Amid the confusion, a man in a camouflage T-shirt briefly became one of the most sought individuals in the United States.
Late Thursday, the Dallas Police Department sparked a manhunt for Mark Hughes though a Twitter post, writing, “This is one of our suspects. Please help us find him!”
Hughes was openly armed, though footage of the march before the snipers began firing shows him walking without incident among protesters. A woman who was recording the protest, Shantay Johnson, told the Dallas Morning News he had given her a high-five.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/07/08/during-deadly-dallas-shooting-confusion-swirled-around-armed-man-carrying-a-rifle/?wpisrc=nl_most-draw7&wpmm=1 

Kind of like a CITIZEN censored by a fraud city council...

 

 

EXHIBIT A attacked by the TV station with the police determining the man was the sole victim - SEE police report HERE:

http://medfordinformationcentral.blogspot.com/2016/07/filing-for-restraining-order-on-matthew.html

____________________________
EXHIBIT B  Council President threatens the same victim with a dirty metal pipe, and the police chief, Leo A. "Lacking" Sacco (or is it lackey quite lacking and licking the mayor's boots, male and female) calling it "inappropriate" but not arresting the fraudulent, violent City Council Ex President who allegedly ripped off a local construction company

__________________________

---attacked by a psychotic government employee allegedly hired by the psycho-from-hell Stephanie Muchacha Burke

  _________________________

---police file false charges on victim and then Matt Page Lieberman, the sleaze that assaulted the victim in the first place, April 27, 2010 lies (under his alias, Matt Justin) and claims - falsely - that the dude Lieberman/Justin attacked was "arrested."  Never happened.

  _______________________________

Then you've got Faccia Brutta herself, the morally and financially bankrupt Doria Pizzotti Alberg lying about the victim and calling him a criminal when every man is innocent until proven otherwise, especially one accused falsely (because he asked about a powerful politician's daughter and an inappropriate relationship with a now exiled teacher)  

The mess in a dress herself at the city council.

Bad drag queens have more of an appeal than that walking track wreck.

_____________________________

---meanwhile, the police let another reprobate go who was friends with Stephen LeBert, the cop who was said to be "like a madman" before he threatened to murder a motorist, that reprobate getting arrested for a false bomb threat and feeding a minor three times his junior three beers.  Was it from a baby bottle during the alleged P-Town sleepover?

__________________________________

  ---the only honest person was Detective JJ who declared that he "lies all the time."

____________________

Good one, a cop being honest that he's verbally dishonest.

Honest about the dishonesty. How refreshing.

Not.

______________________________
To protect and serve?  Serve you up to Julie the Jarhead on a silver platter is what they did.

 

 

_________________________________

Does officer James Lee still have a gun after this domestic violence incident where he allegedly got out of his car to go whack his alleged girlfriend of eight years?

 

Medford sergeant gets probation after alleged domestic ... - Boston.com

www.boston.com/.../police_sergeant_gets_probation.ht...

The Boston Globe

Posted by Matt Byrne March 17, 2011 09:04 AM ... "Sergeant Lee, by vacating his vehicle at the intersection of Swan and James Street, escalated the incident ...
____________________________

Supreme Court Affirms That Even ‘Reckless’ Domestic Abusers Should Lose Gun Rights

Acting impulsively and in the heat of the moment is not a excuse for violence.

06/27/2016 10:27 am ET | Updated Jun 27, 2016  

 

Supreme Court Affirms That Even ‘Reckless’ Domestic Abusers Should Lose Gun Rights

Acting impulsively and in the heat of the moment is not a excuse for violence.

06/27/2016 10:27 am ET | Updated Jun 27, 2016

20k

• 
  
• “A person who assaults another recklessly ‘use[s]’ force, no less than one who carries out that same action knowingly or intentionally,” wrote Justice Elena Kagan, who authored the majority opinion. She was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, as well as Justices Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito. 
  
  The case, Voisine v. United States, was brought by two men who lost their right to own or buy guns after being convicted of domestic violence misdemeanors in the state of Maine. _________________________________ The Supreme Court ruled in a decision announced Monday that a domestic violence assault committed “recklessly” qualifies as a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, and therefore triggers the federal ban on gun ownership.

“A person who assaults another recklessly ‘use[s]’ force, no less than one who carries out that same action knowingly or intentionally,” wrote Justice Elena Kagan, who authored the majority opinion. She was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, as well as Justices Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito.
The case, Voisine v. United States, was brought by two men who lost their right to own or buy guns after being convicted of domestic violence misdemeanors in the state of Maine.
Under the Lautenberg Amendment, which Congress passed in 1996, individuals convicted of domestic violence misdemeanors can’t legally own or buy guns. But lawyers for the two men argued that their crimes didn’t qualify for the federal gun ban because their assaults were committed “recklessly,” as opposed to knowingly or intentionally.
It’s important to note that reckless acts don’t mean accidental. Under Maine law, a person acts recklessly when he or she “consciously disregards a risk that the person’s conduct will cause such a result.”

 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/supreme-court-domestic-violence-gun-rights_us_5771293fe4b0dbb1bbbb0e63

____________________________________________________________

Hearing begins for Medford police sergeant accused of ... - Boston.com

www.boston.com/.../medford_holds_hearing_for_poli.ht...

The Boston Globe

Posted by Matt Byrne February 22, 2011 01:01 PM ... Medford Police Sergeant James Lee, standing right, and others expected to testify were sworn in during a

http://archive.boston.com/yourtown/news/medford/2011/03/police_sergeant_gets_probation.html

Supreme Court Ruling: Man Convicted of Domestic Violence Barred from Possessing a Gun

https://www.hg.org/article.asp?id=32392

---

By Stange Law Firm, PC
 Firm's Profile & Articles
 Call (855) 805-0595

---

This article talks about an important U.S. Supreme Court decision issued in the case of U.S. v. Castleman, 12-1371. This was a unanimous opinion dealing with the ability of an individual convicted of domestic violence to possess a firearm.

 

2:06 PM

Pageviews today 722 Pageviews yesterday 1,118 Pageviews last month 28,716 Pageviews all time history 758,057