Keeping the Police in Medford Honest

752,661 @ 5:53 PM
752,650 @ 5:38 pm
752,616 @ 5:05 pm
247,384 to one million page views

The Court Slams the Door on Domestic Abusers Owning Guns - Jimmy Lee take note.

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-court-slams-the-door-on-domestic-abusers-owning-guns

 

By Rachel Louise Snyder

, June 30, 2016 

  n 2009, a logger named Stephen Voisine shot and killed an American bald eagle. Bald eagles are protected under federal law, though Voisine said he’d believed it to be a hawk, which is also illegal to kill in his home state of Maine. Bird classification notwithstanding, Voisine’s problems were just beginning. It turned out he had a history of domestic-violence charges, including violation of a restraining order, and a misdemeanor conviction related to hitting the woman he was living with.

PURPORTED TO BE THE HANDIWORK OF JAMES LEE OF MEDFORD, POLICE OFFICER

THAT'S HOW THEY PROTECT AND SERVE UNDER CHARLATAN CHIEF LEO SACCO

in Medford, if you get beat up by a cop, the chief will say you have "issues" and blame the victim.

If some fat government official chest bumps you, the city solicitor will tell you that you, like your blog, are "delusional" and that it never happened.

BUT, if you ask who the allegedly promiscuous woman was along with the varsity coach in a public records request, VOILA, the case that they said was DEAD is suddenly alive and well, only the victim faces criminal charges because ...oh my God, he dared ask about a powerful politician's daughter allegedly screwing the varsity coach!

Oh my God...free speech in Medford, Massachusetts?  How's your TV station working out for you, Medford?  You pay for it, and you are being victimized too.

Ask for your money back and a corrupt clerk of courts will call you a "motherfucker," put you on his "hitlist" and say "Payback starts tomorrow."

Go to Judge Judy, head of the Superior Court or something in Massachusetts and she will pass the buck to the corrupt (and allegedly drunk) clerk's boss!

Sick, isn't it?
___________________________________________________________
IF THE ALLEGEDLY DRUNK CLERK HAS A GUN PERMIT, IT SHOULD BE VOIDED BEFORE HE POTENTIALLY USES HIS GUN INSTEAD OF HIS DIRTY MOUTH.

Thomas’s view was spelled out earlier this week in a dissent at the Supreme Court. 

The Court ruled, by a vote of 6–2 (Justice Sonia Sotomayor was the other dissenter), to uphold a ban that prohibits abusers convicted of domestic-violence misdemeanors from owning or possessing firearms. 

The defendants’ lawyer had argued that the men’s conduct toward their domestic partners was not intentional but rather merely “reckless.” 

Or, to put it another way, neither man had meant to hurt anyone. 

They went crazy, flew off the handle, blew a gasket, went ballistic, hit the ceiling. 

Pick a euphemism. Point being: there is lots of available language that obviates personal responsibility.

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-court-slams-the-door-on-domestic-abusers-owning-guns

Pageviews today 459 Pageviews yesterday 757 Pageviews last month 28,757 Pageviews all time history 752,616