Pages - Menu

Pages

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

Victim Will Seek Restraining Order on Offender; Press Complaint against Clerk of Courts

887,144 @ 8:29 AM
887,106 @ 8:04 AM

"Crazy" is what one court official said when he heard that a clerk of court left a victim in a room with two offenders.

The clerk APOLOGIZED and said she should have let the victim / complainant go out of the room first.


A complaint has been filed with her superior. Today the Trial Court Committee on Professionalism for Clerks of the Courts - will get an earful and a demand letter.

Rules of the Trial Court Committee on Professional Responsibility for Clerks of the Courts 

One thing's for damn sure - if she left a victim with two offenders - exactly a complaint the victim made to her IN THE HEARING - that it was nine against one - then her ruling is also flawed and the motion for a new hearing against the crime boss and his accomplice MUST be issued.

THREE INCIDENTS OF HARASSMENT
BY SCARY INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE HURT THE CITY.

However, the incident does rise the bar to three INCIDENTS of harassment by a president of a non profit and his guffawing clerk.

1)They have participated twice now in the interference of the victim's civil rights - once at city hall, now once at a court house

2)The offensive crime boss admitted to "unwanted touching" of the victim in a courtroom, under oath.

SO BECAUSE TIME ELAPSED THE CRIME BOSS THINKS THAT HE CAN CONTINUE HIS WRONGFUL CONDUCT YEAR AFTER YEAR AFTER YEAR?  NOT IN A CIVIL SOCIETY

Years of harassment aimed at victims named Matt, Pat, Chrissy, Allison, Joe, Doreen, Christopher, the two brothers from New Hampshire are all going to be front and center as charges are pressed against the offenders.

A clerk of court left a man who filed a legitimate complaint in a room with two offensive, loathsome creatures.  As the victim told the clerk "Why not put O.J. Simpson in the room with Nicole and leave?"

You could see on the clerk's face that she did wrong, and the cameras have the victim's discussion with her securely on tape.

What the cameras also have are:

1)The menace to society glaring at his victim at 1:55 pm

2)The menace to society and his accomplice leaving the hearing room and then the victim leaving the hearing room.  Both without the clerk present.

This information was given to her boss to secure the cameras and the video footage.


Fourteen years of harassment will come to an end as we now have three instances of harassment by the crime boss the victim told the clerk was a "SNEAK!"

He has other people do his dirty work.  BUT NOW, the "Teflon Don" of non-profits will be found as guilty as gangster John Gotti.

Now justice will be served.   

The court clerk, by her failure to keep the public safe from a known menace, by leaving a complainant/victim in a room where he could be further harassed by two snickering baboons, will have to respond to a legitimate complaint that she acknowledged has her in error.  Has her showing a lack of good judgment which put a victim at risk.

In error?  The court officials (about five of them) that I spoke with thought it was outrageous, one official calling her bad action "crazy."

Indeed it was crazy.

The court clerk left a complainant in a room with two thugs that he complained about.

Time for a restraining order on both of them; and now that they are both guilty of three incidents each, we can obtain that order of protection.


We also will invest time and energy to ensure that clerk is put on desk duty or fired!

ALL IT TAKES IN THIS LIFE IS ONE MAN WITH A VISION AND THE PERSISTENCE TO BRING THUGS TO JUSTICE.

THAT CLERK IS IN FOR A VERY LEGAL RUDE AWAKENING OF A SERIOUS COMPLAINT CHARGING HER WITH INTENTIONAL NEGLIGENCE; WITH HER IRRESPONSIBLE ACTION WHICH LEFT A VICTIM VULNERABLE, IN A ROOM WITH A CRIME BOSS AND HIS SECOND IN COMMAND.

WHERE'S THAT CAMBRIDGE CAB COMPANY WHEN YOU NEED A LIFT?

PURPORTEDLY WITH PROTECTION FROM THE ALLEGEDLY CORRUPT COP ON THE TAKE.  BUT THAT'S A STORY FOR ANOTHER DAY.   

OR FOR THE PRESS.

GUESS IT'S TRUE...THE APPLE DON'T FALL FAR FROM THE TREE, DOES IT?