Pages - Menu

Pages

Saturday, April 14, 2018

Was a Lebert Family Member Caught Up in the Gerry Clemente Saga?

New anonymous source says that Stephen Lebert may have a family member (not Uncle Dickie, who lost in a civil case) WHO allegedly was caught up in the Clemente case and WHO "allegedly did time"  because - allegedly - of "exam scam."

We are investigating.

*PLEASE NOTE

FREDERICK LEBERT'S NAME CANNOT BE FOUND IN THE CHARGES OR IN THE CONVICTIONS

 ALL DUE RESPECT TO FREDERICK LEBERT, THIS IS ABOUT HOW SOME OF THE ROGUE COPS IN MEDFORD BEHAVE, AND IS PART OF AN INVESTIGATION INTO HOW EMBATTLED CHIEF LEO A. SACCO JR. ALLEGEDLY COVERED UP THE ALLEGED CRIMES OF STEPHEN LEBERT.

THIS IS ABOUT HOW ALLEGEDLY UNETHICAL AND UNSCRUPULOUS THE OFFICE OF LEO A. SACCO, JR. IS GIVEN HIS SON'S INVOLVEMENT IN
BREATHALYZER-GATE!


When we find out, when we verify the tip, if true, it could send shockwaves through Medford in regards to SACCO-GATE, and Barry and Gerry know it will! 

Who is FREDERICK LEBERT?

Is this Stephen Lebert's father? 

File under: The Apple Don't Fall Far From the Tree, if so, Gerry!!!



4. CLEMENTE said that he and DOHERTY stole copies of a March 3, 1979 Somerville police captain exam, an April 21, 1979 MDC sergeant exam, and an April 21, 1979 statewide sergeant exam. (On statewide exams, applicants could choose which towns' police departments, and which open positions, they wished to apply for.) They sold the Somerville exam to Arthur PINO. They gave or sold the MDC exam to Joseph Bangs, Robert CLEMENTE (Gerald's brother), Richard Nazzaro, Frederick Lebert, and Robert Spencer. Bangs testified that he paid CLEMENTE $3000 for his own exam and $3000 for Spencer's. DOHERTY himself took the statewide exam, got a high score, and obtained a promotion to sergeant in the Medford police force.

https://www.leagle.com/decision/1989914867f2d471911

7. CLEMENTE said he sold an October 17, 1981, Capitol Police captain examination to Richard Madden. He said he sold an April 23, 1983, statewide sergeant and lieutenant examination to Joseph Bangs, Nicholas SALERNO, William Gilbert, Richard Nazzaro, and Frederick Lebert. Gilbert corroborated CLEMENTE's testimony about the April exam. Also, CLEMENTE and Bangs testified that CLEMENTE entered the MDPA offices to file and backdate Bangs' exam application, which Bangs had not sent in on time. Bangs took the exam, and obtained a promotion to MDC police lieutenant. CLEMENTE said he also gave a copy of the April 23 exam to DOHERTY, who used it to obtain a promotion to Medford police lieutenant.

 

We find all other arguments that appellants have made, and all variations on the arguments we have discussed, to be without merit.

The conviction of R. CLEMENTE on Count 5 is Reversed.
All other convictions are Affirmed.

FREDERICK LEBERT'S NAME CANNOT BE FOUND IN THE CHARGES OR IN THE CONVICTIONS

 

APPENDIX A

Relevant Charges — Listed By Crime

1. The general mail fraud conspiracy (Count One)
a. Convicted by jury: DOHERTY BARNER (granted new trial by district court) SALERNO b. Unindicted co-conspirator: CLEMENTE 2. The subsidiary conspiracies:
a. Convicted by jury: PINO (Count 3) R. CLEMENTE (Counts 5 and 7) DELIERE (Count 6) b. Pled guilty: RAY (Count 3) 3. RICO charges:
a. Convicted by jury: DOHERTTY b. Pled guilty: CLEMENTE 4. Perjury
a. Convicted by jury: BARNER b. Pled guilty: RAY

APPENDIX B

Convictions — Listed by Defendant

Defendant              Conviction                  Count
CLEMENTE               RICO                        11
(pled guilty)
DOHERTY                general conspiracy          1
                       RICO                        11
SALERNO                general conspiracy          1
BARNER                 general conspiracy
                       (given new trial)           1
                       perjury                     2
PINO                   subsidiary conspiracy       3
RAY (pled guilty)      subsidiary conspiracy       3
                       perjury                     4
R. CLEMENTE            subsidiary conspiracies     5, 7
DELIERE                subsidiary conspiracy       6