Pages - Menu

Pages

Saturday, October 12, 2019

Hypothetically Compare Medford Government Malfeasance with British Sex Case

1,415,527 @ 10:44 am
1,415,522 @ 10:30 am 10/12/19
   84,478 to 1 1/2 million 10:44 am


Read this story and think of Mr. Repugnant himself, Mark E. Rumley, Medford charlatan city lawyer

https://www.yahoo.com/news/senior-partner-legal-firm-avoids-ban-tribunal-sexual-activity-junior-lawyer-081349487.html

MR. CORI-CHECK RUMLEY NOW FACES POSSIBILITY OF THE HIGH SCHOOL DOING WHAT THE HOUSING AUTHORITY DID: (allegedly) NO CORI CHECK TO ALLOW AN ALLEGED PERV INTO THE SYSTEM.

by the way, Mr. Rumley, THIS WRITER just received a "Background Clearance" from Massachusetts for a new job I'm up for, but you knew that already. - a Background Check Clearance Certificate - but like many of the candidates for elected office, we do not want to submit to your phony CORI check as we all know Patrick Gordon or you will make up some lame false charge to keep the public off of the public airwaves funded by the public.

In essence, Mark Rumley, we submit that you are a thief with not a scintilla of integrity.   Mark Rumley STEALS from the public (P/E/G television lies!,) makes it difficult for kids and seniors and parents to get free computer classes.  Rumley cheats.  He's a horrible human being, a very bad man, and it is ALL DOCUMENTED.


Low standards-Mark would even lie to a retired judge, years before a judge threw Rumley off of a witness stand - 9-1-16 for "irrelevant" testimony!


City Solicitor Mark E. Rumley / Medford Daily Mercury on or about Nov. 16, 2008 (quoted from the 2nd Judge Jackson-Thompson hearing) saying:

“The one sentiment that I have heard that I take great exception to is that the city is trying to limit speech,” said Rumley. “The notion the city would censor or squelch free speech is baseless and as city solicitor I would find any such effort repugnant.”
____________________________
Hey Mark -
Lip service is so unbecoming.
Some of us are doing the heavy lifting...and you ain't included in that group!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/senior-partner-legal-firm-avoids-ban-tribunal-sexual-activity-junior-lawyer-081349487.html



Is there a difference between inappropriate behavior by police in regards to alleged salary misconduct, and a British lawyer "breaching professional standards...failing to act with integrity and behavior that brings his (and her) profession into disrepute..."


---Mark Rumley can't even look in the mirror without lying to himself.

--- a city clerk slugging a senior is an act of violence condoned by Rumley, the mayor (McGlynn) and Chief Sacco.  It's as if Rumley had violently hit me, or Sacco or McGlynn. 

These disreputable self-service clowns do not believe in public service. They screw the public, and Rumley is the worst of them all...

---Rumley masquerades as a benevolent honest man when he's so crooked he makes Dick Nixon look like a choir boy.

---Rumley's office demands the highest of standards, yet Rumley, in sleazy fashion, holds himself to the lowest of standards, a true gangster attorney in a city that IS pure organized crime.


Beckwith denied breaching professional standards of failing to act with integrity and behaviour that brings his profession into disrepute, dismissing the woman’s account as “complete fabrication”.
But at the conclusion of the hearing on Thursday, the panel found that he knew or should have known that Person A was too drunk to make a proper decision about sexual activity and he should have known it was inappropriate.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/senior-partner-legal-firm-avoids-ban-tribunal-sexual-activity-junior-lawyer-081349487.html



Pageviews today
225
Pageviews yesterday
469
Pageviews last month
19,245
Pageviews all time history
1,415,522