control
intimidation
a complete abuse of power
Olivia Benson, SVU!
Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2019, 3:48:56 PM EDT
intimidation
a complete abuse of power
Olivia Benson, SVU!
Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2019, 3:48:56 PM EDT
Subject: News Gathering; Police Chief-difference between right and wrong
To USA Today and other News Media:
Candidate
for mayor, Breanna Lungo-Koehn, said on 10/1/19 on the government
channel: "But there are a lot of people questioning the trust of this
city with regard to this matter and others and they're...they're too
afraid to speak up. This is our police department. The department that
keeps us safe....people are reaching out to us." 1:14:00 in on the city
council videotape October 1, 2019.
The
City Council Vice President - mayoral candidate Breanna Lungo-Koehn,
noting that people are reaching out to the council, and that people are
too afraid (of the police, of city hall) to speak up.
The
police chief, looking weak, talking very slowly - not powerfully,
tapping his finger on the podium, then lies to the public refuting what
the council vice president said. But she's not the only one. One
Medford resident phoned me and said that they'd lost all respect for the
chief of police with his bad performance.
1:15:53 "That we're capable of policing the police" John D. Buckley, Medford Chief of Police.
1:16:06
Buckley "I've spoken to a number of people in the public...(intentional
pause) ...since this happened ...I've received overwhelming support for
the way that it's been handled..." ...
Does
Chief Buckley know the definition of the word "overwhelming?" This e
mail is in direct conflict with Burkley feigning support that is not
there from the people I talk to...the majority of the people who have
spoken with me on this.
Back the tape up and listen to Councilor Michael Marks not-so-overwhelming comments about the situation.
Does
Chief Buckley not know the difference between right and wrong, and the
commitment his oath of office demands of him to "serve and protect"
citizens?
Definition of "overwhelming"
adjective: overwhelming
- very great in amount."he was elected president by an overwhelming majority"
So, we have evidence on tape of Chief Buckley lying to the city council and the citizens of Medford.
More
importantly, the public is overwhelmingly against how the chief handled
it, if you listen to the council vice president, this reporter and many
others.
When
a city council vice president states on the same video that the public
is afraid of the police, and when this writer finds evidence,
overwhelming evidence, actually, that refutes Buckley's false claims -
oh, a politically connected cop committing adultery then breaking the
lip of his mistress; a cop having his gun taken away by a judge for
spousal abuse - yet still packing a piece, carrying a gun, while on
duty; a cop driving drunk, a cop strangling his wife and now a QUARTER
of the police force under John Buckley disciplined, 27 out of 112, and
all the chief can say to save his own bacon is "These are good men and
women" - the same mantra / talking point on the police website in
Buckley's bio. Detective Mackowski and Officer Paul Covino turning a
blind eye to ex city clerk Edward P. Finn committing a felony; Edward P.
Finn failing to show up in criminal court under subpoena on 1/31/17,
the same week ex chief Sacco's son was allegedly drunk driving,
according to Channel 5 news. These are not honest officers of the law
- and be very clear about this:
---Covino,
Mackowski, Buckley hold themselves to the lowest of standards when the
public wants the highest ethical standards for people in positions of
authority
----Covino,
Mackowski, Buckley, Mrs. Burke, Solicitor Mark Rumley are WORSE than
criminals because they pretend to be good, law-abiding public servants
when, in fact, they take care of their families first and they feed the
public to the wolves and the lions.
That's
how they conduct themselves in the city of Medford which is pure
organized crime. You can't believe what Buckley tells you becaue the
criminal element runs the city of Medford and citizens are much too
afraid to bring child pornography to the police station or a photo of
the mayor giving the finger to firefighters or the photo of Rep Donato
grabbing the penis area of the former vice president to the council,
Michael Marks, who talks a good game but is as spineless as the rest of
the thugs running and ruining the city of Medford.
The
public isn't buying it. Not the excuses, not the stonewalling, not the
failure to be honest, the lateness of the press conference, perfectly
timed after a celebration of the "topping off" of the new police
station, this entire fiasco orchestrated by Chief Buckley, Mayor Burke
and Solicitor Rumley.
These
facts hardly show "overwhelming" approval of Chief Buckley's bad moves;
the show they opposite, that the public does NOT support Chief
Buckley's cowardly ducking of information 30 days before a critical
election. Buckley is doing the bidding of dishonest mayor Burke, and it
is sick, it is calculated, it is wrong.
Chief
Buckley knows the difference between right and wrong, and his decision,
his determination, was to do the wrong thing and blind the public to
how ugly and awful this story is.
Now
Buckley, instead of showing strength, instead of being a man, hides
behind the skirt of the deceptive District Attorney of Massachusetts,
Marian Ryan. You make an untrustworthy woman do your dirty work,
Chief Buckley? Is that what a man does?
Or is that what a yellow-bellied coward does?
______________________________________________________________________________________
1)A
police chief needs to know the difference between right and wrong.
Chief John D. Buckley of the Medford Police Department is just as bad as
Leo A. Sacco, Jr. who preceded him. On 10-17-17 "Buddy" Sacco was at
the city council lying about how fine and dandy everything is in
Medford. Earlier that year, January 2017, his son was NOT arrested for
allegedly drunk driving. Channel 5 reported that they took the gun,
keys, truck away from the MBTA cop and a "family member" drove him home.
3)News
Gathering in Medford can't be cablecast on local television EVEN IF E
MAILING THE STORY, as the City Solicitor has demanded CORI checks on
individuals, not to protect the children, but to spy on potential
candidates for elected office. If you want to MAIL your tape or DVD in
or e mail it to the station, Rumley demands a CORI WAIVER FORM which
makes the participant look like a child rapist.
Solicitor
Rumley's track record is ugly - allegedly moonlighting at Somerville
District Court to allegedly collect credit card bills; Rumley using his
taxpayer funded city e mail on the Immaculate Conception church
website. Charlatan Rumley appointed himself to investigate a 501c3 that
ripped off the community though Rumley had a huge conflict: Rumley was
on the board while the "alleged" crimes were being committed. So Rumley
ran from the investigation that he started because - let's face it - he
was on the board when alleged crimes were being committed and he - as
the city attorney - didn't stop the abuses, the waste of cable TV
subscriber monies via the franchise fee.
July 31, 1986
William F. Weld, the United States
Attorney, charged today that the men formed a ''tightly knit clique
moving to seize governmental power'' and ''posed a serious threat to law
enforcement'' in Massachusetts.
As an
example of the threat, the Middlesex County District Attorney, Scott
Harshbarger, cited a $1.5 million bank burglary that he said was carried
out by the ringleaders of the group, who were then able to ward off
investigation for five years.
Mr.
Weld, who has been nominated by President Reagan to head the criminal
division of the Justice Department, said the case was unusual and one of
the most serious examples of police corruption in recent American
history.
There is no news gathering in Medford because Rumley censors the residents with impunity.
Rumley
will make you look like a child rapist if you don't sign his phony form
which he said publicly, on TV, was "in flux" on or about March of 2018 -
over nineteen months ago - a phony form to MAIL your shows in to YOUR
TV station which Rumley has stolen from you, which Mayor Burke has
stolen from you with a Chapter 74 board found "guilty" of not adhering
to the Open Meeting Law...intentionally and on purpose. So that the
mayor could spend the money that this journalist saved the city when I
demolished the old TV3 under that fraud bord of directors that Attorney
Rumley was appointed to.
Rumley
fractures his oath of office and spits at you when Demarest vs
Athol/Orange gives us what his pal Paul Donato, state reprobate, calls
"the Most Protected Right" - political speech during an election cycle.
May 21, 2014 - Demarest v. Athol/Orange Cmty. TV, Inc., 188 F. Supp. 2d 82 (D. ..... is “fundamental and virtually self-evident”); Demarest v. Athol/Orange Cmty.
A federal court has ruled that nonprofessional news gatherers have
the same rights as professionals, supporting a community gadfly who
claimed she was muzzled by a public access cable company.
It is the first ruling of its kind, said the American Civil Liberties Union, which represented plaintiff Patricia Demarest in her fight with Athol/Orange Community Television.
"It
will open so many more doors for common citizens to use public access
as a public forum and a place to speak their minds," said Demarest,
co-producer of the program "Think Tank 2000."
"It's a fight for any common citizen to bring forth ideas and generate healthy communities."
Demarest used the program to accuse local officials in the central Massachusetts town of Athol of conflicts of interest.
But after she broadcast the grilling she gave one official, she was suspended by the cable company, whose board is appointed by the city. The company also changed its rules to ban controversial programming, requiring broadcasters to get written permission from anyone they portrayed.
It is the first ruling of its kind, said the American Civil Liberties Union, which represented plaintiff Patricia Demarest in her fight with Athol/Orange Community Television.
"It's a fight for any common citizen to bring forth ideas and generate healthy communities."
Demarest used the program to accuse local officials in the central Massachusetts town of Athol of conflicts of interest.
But after she broadcast the grilling she gave one official, she was suspended by the cable company, whose board is appointed by the city. The company also changed its rules to ban controversial programming, requiring broadcasters to get written permission from anyone they portrayed.
Chief
Buckley lies as sweetly as Mark E. Rumley does - just put "Rumley
Repugnant" in Google and get Mark Rumley lying to a retired judge:
City Solicitor Mark E. Rumley / Medford Daily Mercury on or about Nov. 16, 2008 (quoted from the 2nd Judge Jackson-Thompson hearing) saying:
“The
one sentiment that I have heard that I take great exception to is that
the city is trying to limit speech,” said Rumley. “The notion the city
would censor or squelch free speech is baseless and as city solicitor I
would find any such effort repugnant.”
Now Mark wants to CORI check you, even if you mail a show
in to the TV station.
So much for political speech during an election cycle.
What
it means is that Rumley and Burke are screwing with an election again,
can't win honestly, they have to cheat, and they spit in your face while
they rifle your wallet out of your back pocket.
Hey, I'm only the guy Judge LaMothe called "very logical," and who Judge Fitzpatrick said is "an intelligent man."
Why
listen to intelligence and logic when Rumley can distract you with his
eloquent lies, straight out of his worn-out thesaurus.