The Supreme Court decision in United States v. Rumely345 U.S. 41 (1953), took as its basic premise the First Amendment’s prohibition against congressional abridgment of the rights of free speech and a free press.

Rumely convicted of contempt after refusing to tell congressional committee who bought political books



MANY CITIZENS CONSIDER THAT POMPOUS DONKEY A HORSE'S ASS.
HIS EARS MUST BE RINGING THE WAY SO MANY RESIDENTS HAVE COMPLAINED TO ME ABOUT HIM...SO MUCH STUFF I CANNOT REVEAL IT OR THE THIN-SKINNED CREATURE WILL THREATEN TO SUE ME, AS HE HAS DONE ON OCCASSION


___________
Listen to City Solicitor Mark E. Rumley make a false and fictitious statement to the citizens of Medford:



City Solicitor Mark E. Rumley / Medford Daily Mercury 
on or about Nov. 16, 2008 (quoted from the 2nd Judge Jackson-Thompson hearing) saying:

“The one sentiment that I have heard that I take great exception to is that the city is trying to limit speech,” said Rumley. “The notion the city would censor or squelch free speech is baseless and as city solicitor I would find any such effort repugnant.”
Hey Mark -
Lip service is so unbecoming.



THE BOTTOM LINE, CHIEF JACK BUCKLEY LIED TO THE
RESIDENTS OF MEDFORD ON OCTOBER 1, 2019 IMPLORING 
UNSUSPECTING RESIDENTS - WITH NO EVIDENCE -
THAT THE CORRUPT POLICE WERE 'ALL GOOD MEN AND
WOMEN"

OBVIOUSLY MARIAN RYAN, THE D.A., WAS NOT IN 
AGREEMENT WITH RUMLEY OR BUCKLEY

THIS MAGAZINE UNLEASHED DISTRICT ATTY RYAN'S
BRADY LIST

MAKING THE MAYOR BREANNA BRADY
DUE TO HER FAILURE TO GIVE APPROPRIATE PUNISHMENT
TO OFFICERS OF THE LAW SO UNTRUSTWORTHY THAT
THEIR TESTIMONY FROM HERE ON OUT CAN BE
IMPEACHED

OFFICER OF THE COURT
OFFICER OF THE LAW
IN MEDFORD, NOT VERY RELIABLE

WAKE UP CITIZENS
YOU ARE GETTING SCREWED UNDER BUCKLEY'S
WOEFUL COMMAND