Open Meeting Law Complaint 3 What Relief Is Desired?

 

What Relief is Desired:

 Clearly there is an URGENT need to hold the council accountable for speech in Medford. The urgency is in the public interest. The action that is necessary: 1)That this petitioner be allowed to alert the public to the wrongful conduct of a member of this body, the City Council. 2)Caraviello's malice and retaliation have no place in an open meeting. Caraviello was asked to recuse himself. When Caraviello fails to do the appropriate thing it undermines public service and benefits Caraviello's ability to deceive voters by cheating those voters of critical information. Between the three OML complaints the petitioner lost $40.00 approx. in Lyft fees and about five hours of my time by Caraviello's malfeasance. I would like $250.00 from Caraviello personally as his and Hurtubise's fictional petition cost me that time and additional time in writing and filing. The Council goes on vacation so Caraviello kicked the can down the road, which is why time is of the essence. 3)The petitioner is protecting the rights of voters and taxpayers. If it means removing Caraviello and Knight and replacing them with the next candidates in line with the most votes, it needs to be done immediately to protect Democracy in Medford.