An Open Letter to Mark Rumley on Why We (He and I) Need to Remove NEIL OSBORNE!

10:10 pm   136 views in 130 minutes.  Outstanding!

All Time1995429 = 4,571 to TWO MILLION PAGE VIEWS, take THAT, PATCH!, NELL!

Today136

Yesterday1149

This Month24514

Last Month35653

9:08  69 page views, over a view per minute!

8:14 pm    21 views in 14 minutes

All Time1995314

Today21

Yesterday1149

This Month24399

Last Month35653

7:59 pm last stats of the day   See attachment below

All Time1995292

Today1148

Yesterday685

This Month24377

Last Month35653

 

JOE V AS THANOS FIGHTS OSBORNE!

LETTER TO RUMLEY below...read it!!

Be Well, Paulette; 

Letter to Rumley on Neil Osborne Problem

PHOTO FROM MEA MUSTONE, THANK YOU KINDLY

You can read this Open Letter to Mark E Rumley here:

https://medfordinformationcentral.blogspot.com/2021/09/an-open-letter-to-mark-rumley-on-why-we.html

To Paulette Van der Kloot: Thank You For Your Service.   

 

I believe in term limits, though Our Revolution is certainly worrisome  32 years is a long time.  Enjoy life off of the school committee. That was quite a commitment.  Be well, Paulette.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Days to Nov 2 General Election:43 days

1. • There are 43 days from September 20, 2021 to November 2, 2021

Only 1 Medford News Outlet has apprised you of the timeline from hundreds of days out!

7:30 pm   Medford Information Central is 4,743 away from Two Million Page Views....not the phony numbers you see on PATCH sites allegedly all integrated with each other, but the real deal!

All Time1995257

Today1113     

Yesterday685

This Month24342

Last Month35653

59,995 in the past 51 days, 5 short of 60,000

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Dear Attorney Mark E. Rumley:

Medford residents need to be concerned when Kinga Borondy's article notes:

The mayor, he (Rumley) claimed, is retaliating against Durham for bring to light the alleged wage theft on the part of her staffer and for questioning the mayor’s decision to request a state waiver for hiring police officers for the city.

  https://www.wickedlocal.com/story/medford-transcript/2021/09/20/medford-mayor-requests-psych-eval-veterans-services-director-after-he-files-hostile-work-environment/8385532002/

Is it mere coincidence that my publication has made allegations against David Rodrigues and Neil Osborne, and once Mr. Rumley joined the fight (though from a different direction) Rodrigues went into the exile

at the New England Aquarium?

Now Rumley comes out and alleges something I wouldn't touch (THANK YOU AGAIN, MARK,) going deeper into calling it "alleged wage theft."   OUCH!

 

In a letter to Lungo-Koehn and the City Council, Rumley requested copies of any surveillance video taken in or around the mayor’s office on Thursday, Sept. 16 and any statements taken by Scanlon pertaining to the conversations between Durham and the mayor and Osborne.

God bless you too Kinga Borondy

Now, my perspective on this:

Neil Osborne has denied civil rights to certain individuals, from the veterans to this writer. 

What did Justice Potter Stewart say about pornography?  The same comparison can apply to corruption in city government:

Potter Stewart (January 23, 1915 – December 7, 1985) was an American lawyer and judge who served as an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court from 1958 to 1981. During his tenure, he made, among other areas, major contributions to criminal justice reform, civil rights, access to the courts, and Fourth Amendment jurisprudence.^[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potter_Stewart

The phrase "I know it when I see it" is a colloquial expression by which a speaker attempts to categorize an observable fact or event, although the category is subjective or lacks clearly defined parameters. The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. Ohio.^[1][2] In explaining why the material at issue in the case was not obscene under the Roth test, and therefore was protected speech that could not be censored, Stewart wrote:

I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"], and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.^[3]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it

I know it when I see it.  ANYONE thinking that they could personally get away with Neil Osborne's behavior is clueless.  Mr. Osborne is behaving in a manner that is not helpful to citizens, visitors to Medford, businesses and civic groups.

Osborne is a selfish individual, and has no concern for those of us abused by elected officials.  My theory is that Osborne is in a desperate money situation so he ignores homophobia and elder abuse to collect his paycheck.

I filed a complaint on Osborne and the conflicted attorney responded to it on his own.

Mr. Osborne, like Rick Caraviello and Adam Knight, is as underhanded as the day is long, and a clear and present danger to the citizenry. 

All Time1995292

Today1148

Yesterday685

This Month24377

Last Month35653