PUBLIC RECORDS Question: Possible Appeal ALLEGED ADAM KNIGHT VIOLENT PHOTOGRAPHS Fw: Dual Public Records Request: Medford City Hall, Medford Police Department

 Posted on Facebook....will get lots of attention there.

Public Records Division 

1 Ashburton Pl # 1719, 

Boston, MA 02108

tel:617 727 2832

Dear Public Records Division

In my records request Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2021 4:53 PM and Lt. Casey's response of Nov 8 2021, I do not believe the 90 days to appeal has expired.

A records custodian must comply with a request for records within ten (10) business days. If a custodian fails to respond within ten (10) business days, a requester may file an appeal, so long as the appeal is filed within ninety (90) calendar days of the request

Appealing a Denial of Access to Public Records in ...

________________________________________________________________

a)If this has expired, may I refile with new information?

 

B)in Cronin -v-town of Amesbury please note:

 The Letter    https://casetext.com/case/cronin-v-town-of-amesbury-2

    

Summary of this case from Mercure v. Van Buren Tp.

See 9 Summaries

Moreover, as pointed out earlier, the right 

to privacy of a public employee is a limited one, 

and the contours of that right were not clearly
established in 1992 or today.
In the circumstances of this case, the court concludes 

that the town and the individual members of 

the Board of Selectmen did not abrogate 

plaintiff's clearly established 

privacy rights by public disclosure.

I seek the Bank of America photographs DENIED this journalist AFTER 

the Medford Police Department approved that my news outlet receive
the April 1, 2021 police report on city councilor

Adam Knight.

These photographs are of great public interest 

as Knight was able to somewhat diffuse his awkward position 

(a criminal complaint application by the Medford Police) 

with his use of the

weekly Medford Transcript, something 

that public figures enjoy - to the detriment of the public. 

The public never knew about the September 24, 2021 

magistrate hearing at Somerville District Court, 

which was "continued."     

 

Adam Knight was re-elected in November of 2021 in part 

because the public was deprived the knowledge 

of the "wanton" destruction of a bank door.

Knight used the Weekly Transcript (Kinga Borondy of that 

publication is in the CC and may want to file her own records request) 

to claim it "wasn't a story," when it was the biggest news story

of April, 2021, in my opinion.  

 

My blog and Facebook page obtained lots of interest.

Since the Cronin v Town of Amesbury case notes 

"the right to privacy of a public employee is a limited one..." 

and this Knight complaint filed by the Medford Police is of 

great public interest, I am again appealing the DENIAL 

of the Medford Police to hand over the photos.

Along with what I believe was intentional and malicious 

ELECTION INTERFERENCE by not

releasing the photographs of a dangerous 

and volatile public official, 

I also submit that the photographs may be of 

such a deleterious nature that other abuse I will not mention 

in this document allegedly could be revealed.

Another government agency is in touch with me in regards to that issue.

 

The photographs are essential to the citizens of Medford.  

The City Council itself

is engaging in bizarre behavior in regards to these photos.  

 

This journalist was

DENIED speech at the city council on a number of occasions.  

 

That will be dealt

with in a Presentment letter to the city for possible litigation and violation of the

oath of office vis-a-vis the First Amendment.    

 

Not only was this writer DENIED 

speech, the council was so fearful of the public 

having knowledge that they

erased what little speech I said on the public video 

filing of the minutes of the meeting.

Knight himself, so terrorized by the thought of the 

public knowing of a potential

raise in pay allegedly concocted by the council, 

called a paper of mine out of order (in regard to

potential pay raise) when he had no authorization to do so.  

 

The issue of the council

repeatedly denying speech rights, on the very day 

they took the oath of office (Jan 4, 2022)

is a slap in the face to the public paying outrageous 

taxes in the city of Medford.

I respectfully request those photographs or 

information from the Division on my

ability to refile (for) those photos in light of 

the Cronin v. Town of Amesbury case.

Respectfully

Joe Viglione

Please respond via e mail