Associated Press
Judge: No ‘speck’ of proof in Sarah Palin’s libel case against New York Times
Request for new trial denied https://www.marketwatch.com/story/judge-no-speck-of-proof-in-sarah-palins-libel-case-against-new-york-times-01654038803?link=MW_latest_news
“In actuality, none of these was erroneous, let alone a basis for granting Palin a new trial,” the judge said.
Rakoff wrote that regardless of her post-trial motions, Palin was required at a trial earlier this year to show that an error in a published editorial was motivated by actual malice — a requirement in libel lawsuits involving public figures.
“And the striking thing about the trial here was that Palin, for all her earlier assertions, could not in the end introduce even a speck of such evidence,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.