Pages - Menu

Pages

Sunday, June 19, 2016

Free Speech and Mark E. Rumley

640,124@8:41 am
739,935 all-time page views 12:14 am
184 @ 12:15 am
____________________________________
Look at this nonsense.

Instead of going to Chief Sacco and complaining about a water pistol comment, why didn't the City Solicitor turn himself in for allegedly being a bill collector at Somerville District Court and using Paul Donato's office as his own office for his extracurricular activities, while taking allegedly a full paycheck at Medford City Hall?

Oh, that's right, they all do it.  Hey Mike Nestor, ever wear a uniform to work, or as Muccini Burke's "Golden Boy" is that beneath you?

OK, here's the metaphor.  We are PEACEFUL people, but Mark Rumley will turn it into a manifesto and charge me with starting Pearl Harbor and bombing Hiroshima.  Problem is, Mark, I wasn't born yet.  That don't matter, they don't follow the damn rules in Medford.
______________________________-




City Solicitor Mark E. Rumley / Medford Daily Mercury
on or about Nov. 16, 2008 (quoted from the 2nd Judge Jackson-Thompson hearing) saying:

“The one sentiment that I have heard that I take great exception to is that the city is trying to limit speech,” said Rumley. “The notion the city would censor or squelch free speech is baseless and as city solicitor I would find any such effort repugnant.”

If only his actions reflected his words


3)Mark E. Rumley, City Solicitor, went running to Chief Sacco when I said "take a water pistol to a gun fight."

The original statement was "Don't take a knife to a gun fight" in regards to a candidate besmirching another candidate, calling him a homophobe, when she was director of personnel who was part of an alleged massive cover-up.


The "water pistol" or the proverbial knife was that candidate playing kissy-face nice nice while the vulgar woman running for the same office, with little public support, was lying about him, besmirching him, using robo calls and fake fraudulent polls, and having the Butcher Boy jackass that she once detested at her side.

She was making it a proverbial "gunfight" and her opponent brought a proverbial knife or water pistol.


So that charlatan solicitor goes running to the police chief over a metaphor.

Mark Rumley, again, takes things out of context.
 
City Solicitor Mark E. Rumley / Medford Daily Mercury
on or about Nov. 16, 2008 (quoted from the 2nd Judge Jackson-Thompson hearing) saying:


“The one sentiment that I have heard that I take great exception to is that the city is trying to limit speech,” said Rumley. “The notion the city would censor or squelch free speech is baseless and as city solicitor I would find any such effort repugnant.”

if only his actions reflected his brave words