Osborne Excise Tax Re: Supplemental Response - SPR21/2159

 7:55 pm  1,997,634 all-time = 2,366 to 2 million views

All Time1997634

 

Today1104

Yesterday1237

This Month26719

Last Month35653

If the Lungo-Koehn Administration is so "transparent," why did I have to fight tooth and nail for this? The Sec of State's office actually reminded me and they prodded city hall and we finally have it. A Jaguar and the former city solicitor noting in the Transcript that he is alleging "wage theft." Wage theft is alleged and a jaguar. At least we know he's paying his Medford excise tax. https://medfordinformationcentral.blogspot.com/2021/09/osborne-excise-tax-re-supplemental.html

Dear Joshua  and Sec-DL-PREWEB

Please note the disclaimer at the bottom of Atty Scanlon's correspondence.

My understanding is that these documents are not confidential.

The disclaimer actually scares residents who do not know any better.   All government

documents should be public documents.  This is no longer the mayor's private law firm

but work from public servants paid for by the public.

It would be refreshing if they would start acting like it and remove the dumb disclaimer.

Respectfully said.

That the solicitor's former boss has accused  the individual (of alleged "wage theft") in the documents that I seek

makes the public records request all the more vital for the citizens.

Onto the documents:

1)I am grateful for the excise tax document.  That's all Attorney Scanlon had to send the first time.

2)The new city solicitor keeps sending documents that are in the public domain.  We, obviously,

have them already.

On a personal note, I lobbied the mayor hard for Ms. Scanlon to be appointed solicitor.

Kim Scanlon had my vote of confidence.

Recent records requests have been rather less than forthcoming. 

However, the excise tax was key and I do appreciate that we know

the Diversity Director (the appropriate title for the person in question)

pays this in Medford.

Many of my readers have asked about this.

Thank you, Atty Scanlon and thank you Sec of State's office.

Respectfully

 
 

Joe Viglione 

On Wednesday, September 22, 2021, 06:37:06 PM EDT, Kim Scanlon <kscanlon@medford-ma.gov> wrote:

Dear Mr. Viglione:

 

Attached please find my response in the above-captioned matter.

 

Thank you.

 

Very truly yours,

 

 

Kimberly M. Scanlon

City Solicitor

Records Access Officer

City of Medford

City Hall

85 George P. Hassett Drive

Medford, MA 02155

781-393-2470

kscanlon@medford-ma.gov

Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more Click Here.

7:55 pm