THE POLICE ARE SUPPOSED TO PROTECT US
BUT INVESTIGATING THEIR WRONGFUL CONDUCT BRINGS NEGATIVE REPERCUSSIONS...
WHICH ONLY PROVES THAT THE POLICE WANT OUR MONEY, NOT TO PROTECT AND SERVE US.
When an officer of the law, who took an oath, lies to a victim, it is a violation of "to protect" and "to serve." It doesn't fall under Frazier vs Cupp and, in this writer's opinion, is cause for sanctions.
It is a gross disservice and worthy of sanction.
A former Medford Police officer had a victim mediate with his attackers, allegedly at the behest of a former mayor, Michael J. McGlynn, who was pals with both terrorists...and they were just that - not allegedly but clearly, plain and simple - TERRORISTS. One of them was on trial for a "false bomb threat" and though the case was dismissed - if you took the time to read the court papers - that dismissal was a miscarriage of justice. Read the court papers.
Then the individual was arrested for allegedly feeding beers to a minor in Provincetown.
McGlynn and terrorists...just despicable.
The terrorists wrecked a page about this professional writer that was on Wikipedia.
The victim asked J J McLean to make the terrorists replace the page that they wrecked.
McLean said that he would do it.
McLean lied.
McLean went as far as to tell the victim that he, McLean, "Lies all the time."
So how is that upholding the oath of office?
Now in a mediation case, which can't be disclosed other than facts that are in the public domain, which is that the terrorists wrecked the Wikipedia page, the results of that mediation CAN be discussed - that J J McLean made a promise AFTER the mediation that he would reconstruct the Wikipedia page.
Well, J J McLean lied to a victim. To a person that McLean had concluded was the sole victim; just as the police had determined that in a 2010 report with the same jokers who attacked a man at city hall.
So my rights at city hall, under the 1st Amendment, were violated constantly by city councilors Robert A. Maiocco, Richard F. Caraviello and others, and an associate of Maiocco's attacked me.
Maiocco acted much too slowly to call the police - he should have removed his ugly pals while they were engaging in the harassment initially. The disruption of Alden Chambers in 2010 could be attributed to Robert A. 1.7 million dollar lawsuit against him Maiocco, Jr. for failing to oust his terrorist pals on time, fracturing the decorum and safety that City Hall is required to provide.
_________________________________
But the police had determined, as J.J. McLean had, properly, that I was the sole victim.
Frazier v. Cupp, 394 U.S. 731 (1969), was a United States Supreme Court case that affirmed the legality of deceptive interrogation tactics.
Full case name: Frazier v. Cupp
Decision
- The Court stated the trial judge followed necessary protocol by instructing the jury to disregard the references to Rawls's statements. The Court agreed the prosecution did not emphasize Rawls's statements over other evidence and the statements alone was not "touted to the jury as a crucial part of the prosecution's case."[1]
- The Court ruled Frazier did not formally request an attorney, as required for Escobedo v. Illinois to apply, and Miranda v. Arizona did not apply because the original trial took place in 1965, one year before Miranda. The Court also ruled that the statement, on its own, did not render the confession involuntary based on a "totality of the circumstances" view.[1]
- The Court dismissed the illegal search argument, citing consent was legally obtained from Rawls and his mother. The Court ruled Rawls, a co-owner of the gym bag, was authorized to give consent to search the bag, even though items in certain compartments of the bag belonged to Frazier.[1]
The fact that the police misrepresented the statements that Rawls had made is, while relevant, insufficient, in our view, to make this otherwise voluntary confession inadmissible.[1]
WHAT UNTRUSTWORTHY STEPHEN LEBERT DID, WHAT UNTRUSTWORTHY J.J. MCLEAN DID, WHAT UNTRUSTWORTHY PAUL MACKOWSKI DID WAS TO TURN VICTIMS INTO - IN THEIR INTENTIONALLY DELUDED THOUGHT PROCESS, PERPS.
THAT'S NOT HOW IT WORKS.
MACKOWSKI ESPECIALLY GIVES THE MIDDLE FINGER TO THE LAW. But who are you going to believe? A lying weasel like Mackowski or the 27 cops branded by highly deficient Marian Ryan, Middlesex D.A., as blacklisted and untrustworthy.
Marian Ryan, who pauses too long like balding uncle Bob Maiocco, ALLOWS bad things to fester. Both Maiocco and Ryan's foot-dragging initiated criminal acts by their associates who were under their tutelage....Maicco with the three idiots disrupting a council meeting, Ryan by sending deluded Raquel Frisadi into criminal court when a more productive use of Frisadi's time would have been at Jenny Craig.
OUR INVESTIGATION OF THE L'ITALIEN REPORT, AND SUBSEQUENT PUBLICATION OF IT, RESULTED IN AN ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT ON MY LIFE 11/8/2019.
Notice that I got you, dear reader, the L'Italien Report before Ms. Ryan blacklisted the dirty cops! Ya think that would have happened if I didn't pry the report from Ryan and Mark Rumley's unclean fingers???
IF YOU EXPECT THE POLICE TO FIND THE WOULD-BE ASSASSIN, DON'T HOLD YOUR BREATH...BARRY CLEMENTE HAS STOPPED CONTACTING ME...GUESS HE'S REPEATEDLY READING ABOUT HIS DADDY'S EXPLOITS, THE COPS ARE ROBBERS, NOT THAT I EXPECTED ANY HELP THERE.
OUR NEW MAYOR
BREANNA LUNGO-KOEHN
NEEDS TO CLEAN HOUSE
COPS INTENTIONALLY LYING ABUSE THE LAW, FRAZIER VS CUPP
THE MEDFORD POLICE WAS FOUND TO HAVE A QUARTER OF THE FORCE TO BE PLACED ON THE BRADY LIST
THE FORCE BE WITH YOU, OBI?
NOT IN MEDFORD
THE FORCE BE AGAINST YOU
BUT THEY HAVE A NEW BOSS
ATTORNEY BREANNA LUNGO-KOEHN
AND A KEY INVESTIGATOR THAT PRIED THE L'ITALIEN REPORT OUT OF RUMLEY'S DIRTY, UNCLEAN HANDS.
MORE SOON!
THERE'S A NEW SHERIFF IN TOWN J.J.
