Home »
» Police Chief's Sacco's Son's NON-ARREST is WORSE than Trump's Racism, and Trump's Racism is REVOLTING
1,238,418 @ 1:12 PM
PICK YOUR POISON
CHIEF LEO SACCO vs DONALD TRUMP
‘I’m not going there’: As Trump hurls racial invective, most Republicans stay silent
remember: CHILD PORN ALLEGEDLY WAS DELIVERED TO THE POLICE STATION
J.J. MCLEAN WAS NOT SO HAPPY THAT THE FBI WAS CONTACTED BY THE REPORTER, NOT THE MEDFORD POLICE
AS USUAL, LEO SACCO AND MARK RUMLEY COVERED UP THE CRIME.
JJ MCLEAN CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.
CAN'T CLAIM TO BE THE #1 CYBERSLEUTH AND ALLOW VICTIMS TO BE HARASSED BECAUSE THE MAYOR ALLEGEDLY GAVE HIM $119,000.00 GOOD REASONS NOT TO DO HIS JOB.
2 E MAIL ACCOUNTS WERE HACKED WITH THE MOST VULGAR THINGS IMAGINABLE WRITTEN ABOUT THE JOURNALIST, AND ALL JJ COULD COME UP WITH AFTER DETERMINING THAT I WAS THE SOLE VICTIM WAS THAT I WAS SUPPOSED TO 'MEDIATE' WITH THE DOZEN OR SO RAPISTS THAT RAPED ME.
READ THIS LINK AND UNDERSTAND WHY TRUMP'S RACISM - AS BAD AS IT IS - IS NOT AS BAD AS LETTING THE #1 TERRORIST IN MEDFORD DO ALLEGED CHILD PORN UNTIL PAYPAL, NOT THE MEDFORD POLICE, DROPPED HIS ACCOUNT. ALLEGEDLY.
Sleuth wrote the book on computer probes
Nine years ago, Detective Lt. John
J. McLean was called to the scene of a double homicide in Cambridge. His
task: investigate e-mails between the murder suspect and the victims,
who were involved in a simmering family feud.
Ever the cybersleuth, McLean ended up uncovering some 10,000 images and
video clips of child pornography on a computer belonging to the
assailant’s nephew.
The textbook investigation became the subject of a case study authored
by McLean for “Handbook of Computer Crime Investigation,” published in
2002.
McLean was looking for a motive for murder in e-mails between John Hinds
and his victims, Joseph and Mary Beranger. With a search warrant in
hand to examine Hinds’ computer, McLean learned it was networked to
three different computers through a local hub.
Because the computers were located in a neighboring house not covered by
the search warrant, McLean needed the nephews’ permission to search the
computers, called“Take Down” and “Chuck.”
While searching the “Chuck” network for e-mails, the dogged McLean found
the cache of child pornography. He described his subsequent
conversation with the suspect, Charles Hind Jr.
Hinds asked, “ ‘Can you erase the child pornography on the system?’ ” an
outraged McLean recalled. “To compound his audacity, he also asked if
there was ‘anything else we could do to end this situation?’ ” McLean
wrote.
“I replied that I could not erase the offending materials.”
Hinds was convicted of seven counts of unlawful possession of child
pornography during a jury-waived trial. Supreme Judicial Court Justice
Francis X. Spina upheld the convictions in 2002.
http://bostonherald.com/news/regional/general/view.bg?articleid=1037967