*Linda Coletti just launched back into sole possession of #2 on the top10. It's been a bit of volatility!
____________________________________
Michael Marks and the Cheryl Voight case!
A VISIONARY COUNCILOR MARKS IS NOT
MORE LIKE A CIRCUS BARKER
RUFF RUFF!
Marks expressed concerns regarding Voigt's history of complying with state sanitation code requirements with her prior employer, the House of Pain in Everett, MA, where she was the general manager. Marks also stated that the proposed use of a tattoo parlor did not fit with his vision of Medford Square.
THIS IS FROM THE CHERYL VOIGHT CASE
CAN YOU BELIEVE THE ARROGANCE OF A CITY COUNCILOR ON HIS VISION OF THE CITY IN 2004
HEY, FOURTEEN YEARS LATER, HOW'S THAT VISION OF THE CITY, MICHAEL?
Voigt
filed suit with this Court against, the City on January 18, 2005. Voigt
alleged four counts in her complaint: violations of the Equal
Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (count one), violations of
Voigt's right to free speech under the First Amendment to the United
States Constitution and the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights (count
two), violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (count three), and violations of
G.L.c. 40A and the Medford Zoning Ordinance (count four). Voigt now
seeks summary judgment on counts one, two, and three of her complaint.
