Tuesday, December 28, 2021

Re: REVISED Petition for Jan 4 2021 City Council of Medford

 

Dear Jennifer Grogan:
 
I would like this petition to be published on the Agenda  
for the first council meeting of 2022.

Please ensure it is not edited, censored, etc.

This petition is of great community interest and there
 is more than enough evidence, which will go to trial,
that journalist Joe Viglione's civil rights, free speech rights, 
have been denied him when his goal is to 
enlighten the public.   
Councilor Adam Knight, a very guilty party, 
lied and claimed otherwise about me,
something edited out of the VOD of the Dec 7 2021 
meeting to try to protect guilty Knight and guilty Rick Caraviello.   

Retaliation by these guilty city councilors will be charged 
against them via the MCAD, court, or both.

This is about the public's right to know in a city 
where Mayor Lungo-Koehn ran on transparency.

There has been little or no transparency in Medford thus far.

Respectfully,

Joe Viglione
Journalist


The Honorable undersigned respectfully asks for:


A NO CONFIDENCED VOTE on city councilors 
found in police reports and ones who have violated 
the rules of the Medford City Council 
as well as their Oath of Office
 
All citizens have a right to these documents 
that law enforcement has already released via 
public records requests of alleged unlawful and 
egregious activities by councilors which 
cause alarm and intrude on the right 
of the public to safety.

Without regard for the truth and 
the city council rules one of the city councilors 
in question called a paper out of order without 
the power to do so, and verbally 
attacked the petitioner on camera.

I ask to discuss, without naming names, 
that police reports of councilor activities exist, 
and also discuss a recent ruling regarding 
the Medford Housing Authority.   
 
This information is of great public
interest and I am volunteering my precious time 
to safeguard the public from certain bad actors. 
 
 (Please Note, off the written petition record: 
If the council calls this appropriate paper out of order, 
which the petitioner fully expects as I defeated 
an outgoing council president in criminal court 
and he is retaliating, it will be yet another exhibit 
for lawyers to discuss.  
 
I am asking counsel if the behavior rises to 
the level of criminal and we will proceed accordingly.  
I am disgusted that the council behaves 
in such a deficient manner and 
wonder how many more alleged crimes 
were committed by these very bad people.)




Joe Viglione 

0 comments: