Spiderman: Far From Home - a review

1,360,857 @ 7:18 am  June 28

British actor Thomas Stanley Holland - born June 1, 1996, was probably 22 playing a sixteen year old in Spiderman: Far From Home, but that won't stop everyone in Medford from having to have a CORI check if the film is shown in what is known in the Commonwealth as "the fractured city," because Mark Rumley has a dirty mind and there's a possibility that Holland's firm backside will be too provocative for Rumley to handle.  Sixteen is legal in Massachusetts unless you were on a board of directors with Mark Rumley and illegally give the 16 year old three beers on an overnight stay at Rumley's house.

(C)Copyright 2019 JV, all tights and rights reserved, Jake Gyllenhaal.

Prelude (was the name of a dyke bar in Boston in the 80s...)

      Happy birthday Tom Holland, June 1, 1996, as your new movie is going to make you millions.   Holland, according to IMDB still lives at home with his parents...now we love our parents (except if your name is Dr. Rabies,) but if you're a 22 year old millionaire playing the part of a disciple of playboy Tony Stark, you really think living at home with brother and sister is what a Tony Stark disciple would be doing?  Do you?  Look, if I'm 22 looking that good I'd be in bed with Jake Gyllenhaal all day long and never coming up for air, but that's me...Leave Zendaya Far From Home.  Zendaya was born September 1, 1996, three months after Tom Holland to the day.  Another 22 year old playing an annoying sixteen year old in the film, and the kid's stuff IS the most annoying thing about this movie   

    C'mon, the above photo has so much adult homo chemistry it makes one wonder what the practicing sessions were like prior to filming...45 year old actor Numan Acar as Dimitri looks like Mark Rumley as voyeur in the background...Jacob Gyllenhaal was born Dec. 19, 1980, by the way, for those keeping score of birthdays.  He was set to play Spiderman 2 until Tobey Maguire recovered, so now he gets to be Mysterioso Mysterio.    Zendaya!  what a name.
____________________________________________________________________________
and now to the review...

Don't you wonder if they had to pay Robert Downey Jr. for his image in the poster, this interesting semi-sequel to Avengers Endgame (released April 26, 2019,) released July 2, 2019.  That's about two months and a week - pretty quick turnaround to pick up the story to one of the biggest moneymaking films of all time.*

     Perhaps the smartest move - and its as obvious as it is contractually prudent - is the presence of Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige.  Feige's not only got the magic touch, his resume' indicates that he has traversed the waters of 20th Century and Disney in regards to Marvel product over the years, and the inevitable work with Sony should have happened a lot sooner. At least the Spidey suit looks more like the original comic book character than in previous outings with Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield, both excellent Spidermen as well.

I would put all three spider characters in the next film, but that's only my genius and logic in its normal digression pattern again.

     So this Endgame sequel cost less than half of the Avengers flick, 356 m for Avengers, 160 for Spidey Far From Home, about 100 million dollars less!

_________________________________________

OK, the real review:

8:34 am

    Back in the 1960s when television got the brilliant idea of playing horror flicks from the 30's and sci-fi from the 50's we, as children, would wonder why it was so boring, why the set-up to when the monsters arrived took so long.

     Disney/Marvel has eliminated that with slam/bang/crash/boom/bam opening just about every film...except for Marvel/Sony's Spiderman: Far From Home.  How boring is the first third of this film?  So bad that I almost left the critic's screening on Tuesday night.

Seriously.  I was this close to walking out.

    Watching twenty-two year old actors badly playing annoying sixteen year old classmates is worse than watching paint dry.  Because drying paint at least has some action!  And this is why Marvel president Kevin Feige is a genius and I am a mere purist critic: the younger crowd in the audience seemed to actually liked it. 

     Now with no place to go but up, how is the rest of the movie?  The rest of the film is one of the best Marvel comics translations of the idea in the original books to film.   Of the seven Spiderman films, the action and plot to Spiderman: Far From Home is the best Spiderman yet, and one of the best Marvel comic films we've yet to see.  If the future holds a complete film with this kind of action and invention, we are in for some fine future treats.

   Jake Gyllenhaal, at 39, is a man's man as Quentin Beck, Mysterio.

*worldwide 2009's Avatar stands at $2,788.0 while Avenger's ENDGAME is at $2,751.6 -  Wikipedia rounding it off to 2,752 billion.  Does it have enough juice to overtake Avatar in the coming weeks?   

SPIDERMAN FAR FROM HOME

160m budget

Endgame:

Budget	$356 million[3]
Box office	$2.752 billion[3]

Read More

Anyone Notice the Missing Cable Advisory Board?

1,360,782 @ 9:19 pm

Anyone notice the missing-in-action cable advisory board? http://www.medfordma.org/mayor/city-events/

Councilor Marks - here's the ammo - open up the access airwaves for the election!

The election and public access television.

The Sec of State's office has ordered Medford City Hall to hand over the CORI waiver form. Now Mr. Rumley stated about a year ago that it was "in flux."

Don't you find it odd with the MILLIONS OF DOLLARS in cable TV ratepayer fees, Rumley intentionally drags his feet, makes up lies, and can't hand over documents?

By the way, I submitted (and posted) the first version of the alleged CORI WAIVER which was just Rumley's way of spying on candidates for elected office.  So it is on public record.

That fact is front and center in the Appeal. The Law Office claims, as usual that it "possesses no such documents." Which brings us to the censorship of political candidates alleged to happen six weeks before the election.

Smoke signals and sign language is how Stephanie and Rumley play the game.  They have rules in place they don't want to document because they know I'm keeping an eye on them.

Just like Stephanie and Roy's phony Access TV "Chapter 74" board failing to adhere to the Open Meeting Law.

What does Jack McGoldrick think of censorship in Medford?    The do-nothing cable advisory board is lame!

Where is the board? http://www.medfordma.org/mayor/city-events/

Read More

RUMLEY MUST RESIGN

Atty Kim Scanlon and media in BCC

85 Geo P. Hassle Drive

Medford, MA 02155

Dear Attorney Scanlon:

Your boss has harassed me, repeatedly.   In his oath of office a person on Facebook pointed out to about 500 of us, in a forum, that Mr. Rumley is hardly "impartial."  People laugh at your boss.  Beyond the laughter is the cruelty and abuse of power Mr. Rumley exacts on the citizenry.

The dictionary definition of "impartial" is below.  

 Treating all rivals equally...   

Rivals? How about his own client, Michael Marks?

Put Michael Marks Mark Rumley in a Google search and my video comes up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdIBJlksJJA

As an attorney, I know you would NEVER create a spectacle like that, and tell me, as an attorney, Ms. Scanlon, is that being impartial to a client, let alone a rival?    

I can't tell you which government agencies are getting this correspondence as confidentially is imperative.

But take a guess.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdIBJlksJJA

Now, put Rumley Repugnant in Google and find Mark Rumley lying TO A RETIRED JUDGE, my old pal Marie (O. Jackson-Thompson) who helped me defeat the infidels at MediaOne (now Comcast) back in the 1990s when I cleaned up Woburn cable on my own!

I told Marie the truth and won the court case.  Rumley lies to my pal Judge Marie...and there you have it...the city suffers.

Remember when Marie O. Judge Jackson-Thompson (retired) said these words on the GATV (Government-access television) channel in Medford around 2008 -    

"I'm here to make sure that this TV station is the best it can be for ourselves and for our children"  

 Well, it's sad to say that the judge, paid $3900.00, failed in her mission.

 And then your boss, Mark E. Rumley, LIED TO THE JUDGE.  Why wasn't Rumley under oath?  

Oh, who cares, 

Mark is so dismissive of his promise, his word of honor, it doesn't matter.  

The man is a reprobate and a cheat and doesn't give a damn about the citizens of Medford OR Medford. 

Just his pocketbook.  Sad.  Pathetic.

im·par·tial 

Learn to pronounce

adjective

    1. treating all rivals or disputants equally; fair and just. 

Learn to pronounce?  The citizens of Medford would be happy if Mark E. Rumley could comprehend and UNDERSTAND the word impartial

I respectfully ask you to turn your boss in for lying to the public and breaking his oath. 

I respectfully request you open the doors to access TV that the public pays for.  Thank you

I am cc:ing Rep Paul Donato and Susan Crowley in his office.   When a program that Mr. Donato wanted to air years ago was censored he was outraged saying to the local newspaper: 

“This is free speech. It’s the public’s right to listen to political speech. It’s the most protected right. I was just flabbergasted.” 

Interesting that Mr. Donato didn't add that it is also the public's right to speak up. Or perhaps my old friend Paul wants to be the only one speaking. Mr. Donato, who in 2007 wrote this in an Op Ed "Bullying in schools is a problem that has negative effects on school environment and on student’s ability to learn in a safe atmosphere without fear. " January 29, 2007  was bullied and witnessed much bullying by the former 501c3 that was operating the TV station.  The station called Mr. Donato a vulgarity, "Pauly (expletive) pants" 

The oath is attached...unfortunately, Rumley has detached it from his brain.  How unfortunate for Medford

Respectfully

Joe Viglione  

P.O. Box 2392

Woburn MA 01888

Read More

Sick Solicitor Rumley Cheats and Lies to Steal Access TV and Constitution from Citizens

1,360,375 @ 10:57 AM

MARK E. RUMLEY NOT IMPARTIAL

BUT HIS OATH OF OFFICE IS TO BE
'IMPARTIAL'

PEOPLE ONLINE LAUGH AT THE CITY LAWYER - AND HAVE POINTED OUT THE WORD 'I M P A R T I A L"

WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?

im·par·tial

/imˈpärSHəl/

Learn to pronounce

adjective

1. treating all rivals or disputants equally; fair and just.

   
   

   "independent and impartial advice"

   synonyms:

   unbiased, unprejudiced, neutral, nonpartisan, nondiscriminatory, anti-discrimination, disinterested, uninvolved, uncommitted, detached, dispassionate, objective, open-minded, equitable, even-handed, fair, fair-minded, just; More HA HA HA HA HA...YOU SEE RUMLEY GO AT IT WITH HIS OWN 'CLIENT' MICHAEL MARKS...REAL IMPARTIAL...HA HA HA HA HA THE JOKE IS ON YOU, CABLE RATEPAYER, WITH THAT RIPOFF ARTIST RUM!

RUM RUM RUM RUM RUMLEY
THE MAN WHO STEALS YOUR ACCESS TV

UNBIASED MARK RUMLEY CHOPS UP HIS OATH OF OFFICE LIKE A BULL IN A CHINA SHOP!  SMASH

RUMLEY OBLITERATES HIS OATH OF OFFICE

WITH GREAT POWER COMES GREAT RESPONSIBILITY....

RUMLEY IS IRRESPONSIBLE AND STEALS FROM YOU, WORSE THAN A THIEF IN THE NIGHT, BECAUSE RUMLEY IS BEHOLDEN TO THE CITIZENS OF MEDFORD

THAT BASTARD HE IS CROOKED WHEN HE BREAKS HIS OATH TO YOU AND ME.

LET'S EXPLAIN IT TO HIM:

be·hold·en

/bəˈhōld(ə)n/

Learn to pronounce

adjective

1. owing thanks or having a duty to someone in return for help or a service.

   
   

   "I don't like to be beholden to anybody"

   
   

   synonyms:

   indebted, obligated, under an obligation, obliged, bound, duty-bound, honor-bound; More

___________________________

THIS IS PART OF AN APPEAL SENT ON
JUNE 25, 2019 TO A RESPONSE BY THE
LAW OFFICE OF MEDFORD
TO A REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS
THE SICK CITY SOLICITOR CAN NEVER SEEM TO FIND!

Exhibit A, noted below, IS the original CORI waiver that city hall  should have given as a reply.

I AM SEEKING THE REVISED CORI WAIVER the city lawyer said was "in flux."  Mr. Rumley failed to do his job when he was on the board of

MCC TV3 (I am the individual in the city that led the charge to shut them down, and succeeded) - Rumley continues to fail to hand over documents,

or even worse, refuses to put things in writing knowing that I will file a public records request and ask for these rules Rumley expects 60,000 or more people to follow.

EITHER RUMLEY CAN'T READ

OR RUMLEY INTENTIONALLY 

FRACTURES HIS OATH OF OFFICE

WHAT A BAD PERSON

WHAT A VERY BAD MAN MARK E RUMLEY IS...

COLLECTING MONIES AT THE COURTHOUSE TODAY, MARK, ON COMPANY TIME...OH, THAT'S RIGHT...

IT'S NOT THURSDAY

HOW'S YOUR PAL, DISGRACED TED TOMASONE, DOING TODAY?

YOU'LL BE JOINING TOMASONE IN RETIREMENT, THE SOONER THE BETTER FOR MEDFORD

YOU HAVE NO IDEA THE LETTERS WE ARE SENDING OUT ABOUT YOU TO THE AUTHORITIES...BUT YOU KNOW THEY ARE FLYING THROUGH THE POSTAL SERVICE...

EARS RINGING, MARK?

Read More

131 Days to Remove Anti-Christ Stephanie Muccini-Burke

Get Thee Hence Satan Department

The devil is in the details!

Stephanie "Lucifer" Burke 

Office Hours at Marshalls or Kohl's!

Find your mayor at either location...if you can!

It's like hunting for an Easter egg...only if you catch her she will call you a vulgar name and run  like the dickens!  

This phrase is used as a general intensifier. Some common collocations are hurts like the dickens, run like the dickens, work like the dickens, miss you like the ...

collocations
NOT from the Rumley thesaurus!

the habitual juxtaposition of a particular word with another word or words with a frequency greater than chance.

KOHL'S - New Residence of Stephanie Muccini-Burke

Chain department store offering a wide selection of brand-name clothing, accessories & homewares.

Located in: Meadow Glen

Address: 3850 Mystic Valley Pkwy, Medford, MA 02155

Hours: 

Closed ⋅ Opens 9AM

Phone: (781) 395-6001

Read More

A Lack of Justice in Medford

It's time to remove Mark E. Rumley from the city law office in Medford.

Look at how Rumley has decimated free speech and public access television.

Rumley spits on his oath of office.

Rumley is a clown who antagonizes a city councilor with his rants and lopsided ego.

people online laugh at Mark E. Rumley when they read the word "impartial" in Rumley's ragged oath of office.

He spits on his own oath of office, meaning,
Mark E. Rumley spits at you!

Read More

APPEAL TO PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST 9:27 pm June 25, 2019

1,360,312 @ 5:25 am  June 26

Public Records Division

Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth
One Ashburton Place - Room 1710
Boston, MA 02108
Phone: 617-878-3660
Fax: 617-723-1372

TO: Public Records Division

On June 25, 2019 @ 4:27 pm I received a response to my request of June 12, 2019, once again seeking transparency on the public access television station that the officials in the city of Medford seem to utilize more than the citizens and ratepayers who fund it.

The reply was "After a comprehensive search...are not in possession of any documents that relate to this request."

If it sounds like an echo  of a previous public records request response, it is.

This appeal I will write differently than previous appeals as the subterfuge that the law office in Medford utilizes is extremely tricky.

This is of great public interest. 

In essence, the city of Medford allegedly has rules in place that are not in physical form.  Keep in mind that I caught the mayor's "Chapter 74 board" (in regards to access television)  violating the Open Meeting Law.     Mayor Burke is the Chairperson of the School Committee https://www.medfordpublicschools.org/about/central-administration/school-committee/ so their failure to adhere to the Open Meeting Law is as dishonest as their failure to document their policies, if, indeed, they have no documents but have policies in place.

My June 12, 2019 request is below.  Attorney Scanlon's response is attached.  What the city of Medford now appears to engage in is some kind of sleight of hand in order to evade the document request.   I'll be blunt and say it appears to have the fingerprints of Mark E. Rumley, City Solicitor, rather than the people in his office, who are excellent, professional and who, sadly, have to work for an individual who is part of an old school highly corrupt political system.  I can prove that,,,and have on many occasion.  

What I seek are the documents where Mayor Stephanie Muccini Burke allegedly plans to squelch free speech at election time.

What I asked for, and did not receive, are these documents:

__________________________________________________________

1)All correspondence between the law office and the mayor, Stephanie Muccini-Burke, regarding limiting speech in Medford - these specifics include but are not limited to

a)documents, memos, e mails, texts regarding an embargo on political speech for six weeks prior to the

November 5, 2019 election

b)Solicitor Mark E. Rumley's alleged new waiver for the CORI document - where is it?; it was supposed to be updated a year or two ago, but the city lawyer intentionally and flagrantly violates his oath of office by dragging his feet on promises - (i.e. the promised MCC TV3 board election in 2009; the demand for financial records in 2013, the CORI waiver that doesn't make an access TV producer look like a child molester, which Rumley's current Waiver does, etc.)

________________________________________________________________ 

The CORI waiver was supposed to be updated.  Not updating it is a serious violation of Mr. Rumley's oath of office to uphold the Constitution and to be IMPARTIAL.

It appears that I have to be a mind reader to articulate EXACTLY the magic words to get the documents that certainly must exist.

To be extremely clear: 

1a)Purportedly Medford Community Media, the public access television channel, is telling membership that they cannot engage in political speech six weeks out from the November 5, 2019 election.   

1b)Mr. Rumley concocted a CORI check, ostensibly so that Mayor Burke could spy on politicians who want to have their own political program.

In my opinion it is a violation of a lawyer's oath of office, fracturing "impartiality" and the need to uphold the Constitution of the United States.

THESE ARE ISSUES OF GREAT PUBLIC INTEREST AS CITY HALL MEDFORD IS, AGAIN, MESSING WITH AN ELECTION.

IT IS SO UN-AMERICAN, IT IS SO WRONG.   THESE DOCUMENTS, OR THE CREATION OF DOCUMENTS WHEN CITY HALL

HAS INVISIBLE RULES IN PLACE TO BENEFIT THE INCUMBENTS, ARE ESSENTIAL AND THE PUBLIC DESERVES TO SEE THEM.

How can there be a rule of no political speech six weeks prior to an election and no such document?

How can the city law office not even have the original CORI waiver when I have a copy (see Exhibit A, below)

Side note: A fellow saw me last week, comes over to me and whispers in my ear "I love everything you do(for the city of Medford.)  There

was a witness to this event.  This investment of my time and the time of the Public Records Division is key and you have my thanks for your

excellent work in this regard.

MY DOCUMENT REQUESTS:

For 1a) there should be some kind of rule on the TV channel website declaring any political censorship, any squelching of free speech.

This was brought to my attention by a very good source, so why the anxiety when we file a public records request?

It is as if city hall is using smoke signals and sign language in order to keep rules and regulations in space and not in written form.  It is chilling.

For 1b) Solicitor Rumley specifically told me, on television, at a meeting of the Cable Advisory Committee, that the CORI waiver is "in flux."

If you look at the entire tape and see my speech and Rumley's response you can see that Solicitor Rumley was being a bully, mean-spirited and

unprofessional.  When I accuse him of being that way with these public records responses, know that I have evidence that that is Rumley's nature.

That we have that on tape should indicate to the Public Records Division what kind of individual we are dealing with at the law office in Medford.

Exhibit A, noted below, IS the original CORI waiver that city hall  should have given as a reply.

I AM SEEKING THE REVISED CORI WAIVER the city lawyer said was "in flux."  Mr. Rumley failed to do his job when he was on the board of

MCC TV3 (I am the individual in the city that led the charge to shut them down, and succeeded) - Rumley continues to fail to hand over documents,

or even worse, refuses to put things in writing knowing that I will file a public records request and ask for these rules Rumley expects 60,000 or more people to follow.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Now the CORI waiver. 

Mr. Rumley doesn't trust the $65,000.00 or so salaried station manager to supervise the facility.  The law requires a CORI when there is unsupervised contact with children.   When I noted this at a meeting of the city council or in another venue, Rumley quickly did an about face and said "the possibility of unsupervised contact with children."  Rumley's fixation on children with these remarks is something he can deal with on his own, we are putting it on public record that the only solicitor in the Commonwealth who seems to have a problem with children is the Medford City Solicitor - every other access TV station trusts their board of directors and employees to supervise properly.  Given Medford's ugly history, and the fact that Rumley was a board member of the eradicated former 501c3 chock full of bullies and harassers, just shows that the policies we the public got rid of are back with a vengeance.

I am cc:ing Rep Paul Donato and Susan Crowley in his office.   When a program that Mr. Donato wanted to air years ago was censored he was outraged saying to the local newspaper: “This is free speech. It’s the public’s right to listen to political speech. It’s the most protected right. I was just flabbergasted.”

Interesting that Mr. Donato didn't add that it is also the public's right to speak up. Or perhaps my old friend Paul wants to be the only one speaking.

Mr. Donato, who in 2007 wrote this in an Op Ed "Bullying in schools is a problem that has negative effects on school environment and on student’s ability to learn in a safe atmosphere without fear. " January 29, 2007  was bullied and witnessed much bullying by the former 501c3 that was operating the TV station.  The station called Mr. Donato a vulgarity, "Pauly (expletive) pants" 

The documents I seek are about (and to address for the public)  this pervasive censorship in Medford dating back to at least 2002, possibly earlier. 

Mayor Burke, and especially city lawyer Rumley, put stumbling blocks to free speech so that the mayor in power can control the message. 

Apologies for the lengthy e mail but time and again Medford City Hall fails to be transparent and it is regrettable.

Citizens want to see all documents pertaining to the public access station's rules and regulations published on the website.

Citizens want to eradicate the invasive CORI demand by a city lawyer who repeatedly failed to rein in his friends and colleagues on the 

now shuttered MCC TV3 board.   My position is that it is a severe conflict of interest for Mr. Rumley to interfere in public access television given his poor

history of protecting the asset for the people of Medford, and given his fixation on fracturing the First Amendment, and by extension, his oath of 

office.  It would be refreshing if the city lawyer would step down or be legally removed.  Then I wouldn't have to spend so much time on appeals.

Thank you, Public Records Division, for your past assistance

Respectfully,

Joe Viglione  

P.O. Box 2392

Woburn MA 01888 

_____________________________________

ANY CITIZEN SIGNING RUMLEY'S RUBBISH WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO GET HIRED.

YOU BASICALLY HAVE TO ADMIT YOU WANT NO CONTACT WITH CHILDREN

GO FOR A JOB INTERVIEW WITH THAT ONE HANGING AROUND YOUR NECK!

NOW YOU MUST BE THINKING "RUMLEY WILL BURN IN HELL FOR ALL ETERNITY."

TRUST US, RUMLEY IS ALREADY THERE.

EXHIBIT A

Medford Community Media
Waiver of Requirement for Criminal Offender Record Information

In consideration of the agreement of the undersigned to refrain completely in his capacity as a  Producer (defined below) from entering upon the Medford High School premiseslocated at 489 Winthrop 
Street, Medford, Massachusetts (the "Premises"), which are utilized by Medford Community Media ("MCM")as its principal place of business, thereby eliminating any possibility that the undersigned will 
have direct and unmonitored contact with children, MCM hereby waives the requirement set forth in  Paragraph 5 of the Producer Agreement and Indemnification Form required to be completed by each 
person, organization or other entity (the "Producer")that requests that MCM carry its programming (the 
"Producer Agreement").   

Paragraph 5 of the Producer Agreement requires as a condition to the Producer  participating in public access offered by MCM that the Producerpermit and consent to the City of  Medford conducting a criminal background check with respect to the Producer. The undersigned 
Producer agrees that all programming submitted to MCM by the Producer shall be submitted utilizing the  United States Postal Service, any nationally recognized overnight courier service or anyother third party 
delivery service, but under no circumstances shall the Producer be permitted to enter the Premises for any  purpose whatsoever, including without limitation the submission by the Producer of proposed 
programming to MCM. The Producer further agrees that while this Waiver is in effect the Producer shall  not be permitted to enter the Premises for the purpose of removing any equipment from the MCM facility 
as provided in Paragraph 8 of the Producer Agreement. While this Waiver is in effect the undersigned  shall, however, be permitted to enter Medford High School as a visitor in accordance with all of the 
requirements of Medford High School that are applicable to visitors. Such right of access shall not  include that portion of the Premises occupied by MCM. The Producer shall be entitled at anytime to 
terminate this Waiver through the execution and provision to MCM of the Criminal Offender Record  Information Acknowledgement Form required by the Medford Public Schools, and subject only to the
results of any such criminal offender record information search, the Producer shall thereafter be permitted  to enter upon the Premisesin his capacity as a Producer. 

Signed as a sealed instrument this ____ day of October, 2017.
    MEDFORD COMMUNITY MEDIA
    By____________________________ 
    Ben Brown, Station Manager 
I hereby agree to the foregoing:

Read More