SO MUCH CRIMINALITY IN MEDFORD CITY GOVERNMENT
THE CITY SOLICITOR IS NOT THE ONLY ONE WITH UNCLEAN HANDS
MARK RUMLEY'S ALLEGED MALFEASANCE IS THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG
1)I was intimidated by a government official the minute Clerk Edward P. Finn attacked me violently and viciously on or about June 16, 2015;
THERE WAS A WITNESS WHO SAW THE ENTIRE THING
AND WHO TOLD ME TO SHUT UP ABOUT IT.
2)after a police officer urged me to press charges when I was not going to, the police ganged up on me and forced my hand to drop the charges on Finn or they would come after the victim of a violent attack,
3)the police then used the assault on me to press phony charges on me. WHEN I ASKED THE POLICE AND SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT ABOUT A TEACHER/VARSITY COACH ALLEGEDLY HAVING SEX WITH A POWERFUL POLITICIAN'S DAUGHTER, A YOUNG WOMAN ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN PROMISCUOUS AT MEDFORD HIGH SCHOOL. THE RUMORS/ALLEGATIONS ARE THAT SHE WAS HIGHLY PROMISCUOUS.
WHAT DID STEPHANIE MUCCINI-BURKE KNOW ABOUT THE ALLEGED SEX CRIME AT THE HIGH SCHOOL
AND DID SOME PARENT OR PARENTS THROW THEIR DAUGHTER'S VIRTUE AWAY TO HELP MCGLYNN ALLEGEDLY STEAL THE ELECTION FROM THE 2015 OPPONENT? TO BENEFIT MUCCINI-BURKE?
WHAT KIND OF EXAMPLE DID THAT SET FOR THE ALLEGED 'VICTIM' OF THE VARSITY COACH/TEACHER
WHAT KIND OF EXAMPLE DOES THAT SET, IF TRUE, FOR THE CITIZENS OF MEDFORD AND FOR SCHOOL CHILDREN?
NOW - ONTO CARAVIELLO'S CRIMINAL STUNT, LYING TO THE POLICE SO THAT HE COULD USE THE COURT IN A MANNER IN WHICH IT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE USED
MALICIOUS ABUSE OF PROCESS FOR HARASSMENT PURPOSES
KEEP IN MIND, FAT BASTARD CARAVIELLO STALKED ME RELENTLESSLY AFTER HE LOST THE CASE
NOW THAT IS INTIMIDATING A WITNESS.
CARAVIELLO IS GUILTY OF IT.
RICK CARAVIELLO WAS - IN MY OPINION - NOT A WITNESS. I DIDN'T EVEN SEE THE LIAR THERE.
BUT WHAT I DO KNOW IS THAT:
A)CARAVIELLO LIED TO THE POLICE AND SHOULD BE ARRESTED AND CHARGED FOR THAT CRIME
B)EDWARD P. FINN LIED TO THE POLICE AND SHOULD BE ARRESTED AND CHARGED WITH THAT CRIME
C)EDWARD P. FINN SLUGGED A SENIOR CITIZEN, WHICH IS A FELONY, AND SHOULD BE ARRESTED AND CHARGED WITH THAT CRIME
D)EDWARD P. FINN RECEIVED A SUBPOENA AND FAILED TO SHOW UP IN A COURT OF LAW, IN CRIMINAL COURT, PROBABLY ON THE LAM BECAUSE MAYBE FINN WOULD HAVE BEEN ARRESTED ON THE SPOT
COWARD
E)MARK E. RUMLEY IS THE CITY ADVISOR/LAWYER - DID RUMLEY TELL FINN TO AVOID COURT AT ALL COSTS? DID HE? DID RUMLEY???
F)RUMLEY GOT A SUBPOENA TO SHOW UP FOR THE DEFENSE TEAM A STALKER PUT TOGETHER.
I HAD RUMLEY REMOVED FROM THE WITNESS STAND WITH A SIMPLE 'OBJECTION' TO THE JUDGE
G)RUMLEY TOLD ME HE 'HAD TO' SHOW UP UNDER SUBPOENA?
---THE JUDGE RULED WHAT I KNEW - RUMLEY AND HIS PATHETIC MUD-SLINGING TESTIMONY WAS IRRELEVANT
---IF RUMLEY HAD TO SHOW UP, WHY DIDN'T HIS ALLEGED CLIENT, FAT EDWARD P. FINN, HAVE TO SHOW UP UNDER SUBPOENA?
WHAT'S YOUR EXCUSE, MARK RUMLEY, THAT THE CITY COULDN'T AFFORD THE CRISCO/LUBRICANT TO SLIDE ON THE COURT DOORS TO STICK THAT FAT BASTARD ED FINN THROUGH THE DOORWAY?
YOU ARE IN A CITY OF SLIME, AND PERHAPS A GOOD LAWYER CAN FIND OUT IF THE R.I.C.O. ACT CAN BE BROUGHT AGAINST FOUR POLICE OFFICERS INVOLVED IN THE SCAM AGAINST A JOURNALIST, THE MAYOR, THE CITY SOLICITOR, ALL THE THUGS RIPPING AWAY THE FIRST AMENDMENT
THEY MAKE GERRY CLEMENTE LOOK LIKE A CHOIR BOY
Listen to City Solicitor Mark E. Rumley make a false and fictitious statement to the citizens of Medford!
City Solicitor Mark E. Rumley / Medford Daily Mercury on or about Nov. 16, 2008 (quoted from the 2nd Judge Jackson-Thompson hearing) saying:
“The one sentiment that I have heard that I take great exception to is that the city is trying to limit speech,” said Rumley. “The notion the city would censor or squelch free speech is baseless and as city solicitor I would find any such effort repugnant.”
Fat Son of a Bitch Caraviello shouldn't touch ANYTHING to do with Medford City Business.
ANYTHING to do with Medford City government
Investigate Caraviello
A private detective may have found what the city needs to
needs to know about Caraviello
know about Caraviello
Case involving city council president tossed out of court
A criminal case involving a city councilman and a Medford media blogger was thrown out of Cambridge District Court.
https://medford.wickedlocal.com/news/20170308/case-involving-city-council-president-tossed-out-of-court
