Saturday, April 23, 2016

Class Action Suit Part II April 23, 2016

684,751 @ 8:03 pm
684,739 @ 7:49 
684,734 @ 7:46 pm
895 @ 7:46 pm  
900 @ 7:49 pm
1,246 4-22-16
907 4-23-16
2,153 page views in 48 hours
315,249 for 1 million page views 
198 days to November 8
114 days Stephony Muccini-Burke has been in office
https://days.to/8-november/2016
__________________________________


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

The Urgency of a Public Access TV Station

For the past 114 days as of today, April 23, 2016, Stephanie Muccini-Burke has taken the wrecking ball to access television, to free speech rights and any sort of transparency in Medford.

There are 198 days to November 8, 2016 - this critical election.

Christine Barber said to give Mrs. Burke time to "get her feet wet."  Quack.  Mrs. Burke worked for Mayor Michael J. McGlynn, she should have been ready on day 1 to put the access TV station on the air as Muccini-Burke was a PROPONENT of it, once upon a time.

A Class Action Suit is what Robert Cappucci and Mario Martin should consider being part of.  Information below.

198 days to November 8
114 days Stephony Muccini-Burke has been in office
Mark E. Rumley interrupted a speech of mine at a city council meeting - when I was utilizing "the people's forum" to rally the troops for a Class Action Suit.  Runley, the individual who was not honest about free speech, has been the problem working lockstep with a mayor, McGlynn, who - according to sources - detests public access, transparency and freedom of speech.

Why would a city lawyer, who yelled at Councilor Michael Marks after Rumley was called one of the mayor's "henchmen" - be so concerned about stifling free speech when, as city lawyer, his duty is to foster free speech.  Rumley is derelict in his duty and should be fired as well as sanctioned.

Rumley also antagonized me at the people's forum, in concert with Paul Camuso, attempting to belittle me by painting me as a man with Alzheimer's - referencing a good friend of mine who passed away of the disease at 85 years of age.  That's how Rumley and Camuso play their hardball - interrupting, lying and not delivering services already paid for


City Solicitor Mark E. Rumley / Medford Daily Mercury
on or about Nov. 16, 2008 (quoted from the 2nd Judge Jackson-Thompson hearing) saying:

“The one sentiment that I have heard that I take great exception to is that the city is trying to limit speech,” said Rumley. “The notion the city would censor or squelch free speech is baseless and as city solicitor I would find any such effort repugnant.”

If Mario Martin is serious about running for office, rather than take on Pat Jehlen, why not accomplish something huge - file a Class Action suit with other residents demanding Access tv that we have already paid for right now.

It's not rocket science...we could have a station up and running in less than a week.  Mrs. Burke is stalling for time intentionally and it is wrong, just plain wrong.  She reneged on the deal for senior citizens to get free parking; she has reneged on the deal for real public access.

It is time for litigation against city hall

Step 6: Getting a Public Access Channel and/or Studio in a town without one.




    * Get the franchise agreement
    * Study the law
    * Study the court decisions
    * What to do next depends on what you find in your franchise agreement, and what your state law says.
Step 6a: Get the Franchise Agreement
Get a copy of the current franchise agreement from the city/town
clerk. This is the contract between your cable provider and your town.
You may have to file a FOIL (Freedom of Information Law) request, and
they may charge you for reproduction costs.
Step 6b: Study the law
Federal regulations are very weak.
o 47 USC § 531 (1984 Cable Act). Does not mandate public access. Only requires that your local town *can* require it. About the only useful
aspect of this law is 531(e) which prohibits editorial control of the
cable provider. Cable channels for public, educational, or governmental use


Step 6c: Study the Court Decisions

    Missouri Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. Kansas City, Mo., 723 F.Supp. 1347 (W.D. Mo. 1989)
  • Denver Area Educ. Telecomms. Consortium, Inc. v. FCC, 518 U.S. 727 (1996)
  • McClellan v. Cablevision of Connecticut, et al., 949 F.Supp. 97 (D.Conn. 1997)

Step 6d: Seek all possible administrative Remedies

  • Discuss your complaint to your cable provider. Cite the law/code you think they are in violation of.
  • Petition the franchising authority (your city/town council, mayor, county legislature, etc.) for declaritory or other relief.
  • Petition the branch of your state government which regulates cable companies
  • If you find a violation of the law by the cable company, contact your state attorney general




Step 6: Getting a Public Access Channel and/or Studio in a town without one.




    * Get the franchise agreement
    * Study the law
    * Study the court decisions
    * What to do next depends on what you find in your franchise agreement, and what your state law says.
Step 6a: Get the Franchise Agreement
Get a copy of the current franchise agreement from the city/town
clerk. This is the contract between your cable provider and your town.
You may have to file a FOIL (Freedom of Information Law) request, and
they may charge you for reproduction costs.
Step 6b: Study the law
Federal regulations are very weak.
o 47 USC § 531 (1984 Cable Act). Does not mandate public access. Only requires that your local town *can* require it. About the only useful
aspect of this law is 531(e) which prohibits editorial control of the
cable provider. Cable channels for public, educational, or governmental use

Step 6c: Study the Court Decisions

    Missouri Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. Kansas City, Mo., 723 F.Supp. 1347 (W.D. Mo. 1989)
  • Denver Area Educ. Telecomms. Consortium, Inc. v. FCC, 518 U.S. 727 (1996)
  • McClellan v. Cablevision of Connecticut, et al., 949 F.Supp. 97 (D.Conn. 1997)

Step 6d: Seek all possible administrative Remedies

  • Discuss your complaint to your cable provider. Cite the law/code you think they are in violation of.
  • Petition the franchising authority (your city/town council, mayor, county legislature, etc.) for declaritory or other relief.
  • Petition the branch of your state government which regulates cable companies
  • If you find a violation of the law by the cable company, contact your state attorney general


8:03 pm

Pageviews today
5
Pageviews yesterday
907
Pageviews last month
29,025
Pageviews all time history
684,751

7:46 pm 
Pageviews today
895
Pageviews yesterday
1,246
Pageviews last month
29,540
Pageviews all time history
684,734