737,700 @ 6:31 am
284 page views since 8 pm last night
Impeaching
Frederick N. Dello Russo, Jr. for violating his oath (vis-a-vis his
censorship tactics and First Amendment violations,) and removing Adam
Knight for doing the same would bring Neil Osborne and Chris D'Aveta
onto the City Council of Medford. Removing one more councilor would
bring Mark Crowley onto the City Council. Now we would have a fair
chance of impeaching Stephanie Muccini-Burke.
We need action to stop the lunacy of Roy E. Belson, the Locust St. development, the lack of access TV, Ed Finn's misconduct (he told his assistants NOT to take any petitions from this resident while he was on vacation. Just one of Finn's offensive tactics aimed at me.) This nonsense has to stop; they treat us like cattle and raise taxes to the highest level possible while paying themselves handsomely with sleazy votes in the dark of (k)night.
We need action to stop the lunacy of Roy E. Belson, the Locust St. development, the lack of access TV, Ed Finn's misconduct (he told his assistants NOT to take any petitions from this resident while he was on vacation. Just one of Finn's offensive tactics aimed at me.) This nonsense has to stop; they treat us like cattle and raise taxes to the highest level possible while paying themselves handsomely with sleazy votes in the dark of (k)night.
There has to be a
law firm out there that wants the press and recognition for helping us
remove the filth that has invaded and infected Medford City Government.
We are going to find that law firm. We are going to improve life in Medford by removing the unethical sycophants and their unqualified hack hires.
http://showmelawyer.com/impeachments-mayors-city-councils/
Our system of government provides many checks and balances to ensure that no one individual can amass too much authority. One of those important checks allows a legislative body to impeach elected officials who may step outside their bounds. For city councils, they may occasionally be faced with mayor or alderman who continuously goes beyond their authority in taking actions on behalf of the city. Or they may have to deal with an elected official who disregards the law and is causing a disruption to the city operation.
It is clear that Missouri law provides only one method to remove a member of the Board of Alderman from office: Impeachment. RSMO § 79.240 allows the mayor, or a member of the Board of Aldermen, to be removed from office with the consent of two-thirds vote of all members of the board. The removal must be based upon “cause shown,” which Missouri courts have interpreted to include any legally sufficient ground or reason for the impeachment.[1] The reason should relate to, or effect, the administration of the office and be related to the rights and interests of the public. Such reasons could include an act of improperly performing his duty, exceeding his authority or failing to fulfill his responsibilities.[2]
We are going to find that law firm. We are going to improve life in Medford by removing the unethical sycophants and their unqualified hack hires.
http://showmelawyer.com/impeachments-mayors-city-councils/
Our system of government provides many checks and balances to ensure that no one individual can amass too much authority. One of those important checks allows a legislative body to impeach elected officials who may step outside their bounds. For city councils, they may occasionally be faced with mayor or alderman who continuously goes beyond their authority in taking actions on behalf of the city. Or they may have to deal with an elected official who disregards the law and is causing a disruption to the city operation.
It is clear that Missouri law provides only one method to remove a member of the Board of Alderman from office: Impeachment. RSMO § 79.240 allows the mayor, or a member of the Board of Aldermen, to be removed from office with the consent of two-thirds vote of all members of the board. The removal must be based upon “cause shown,” which Missouri courts have interpreted to include any legally sufficient ground or reason for the impeachment.[1] The reason should relate to, or effect, the administration of the office and be related to the rights and interests of the public. Such reasons could include an act of improperly performing his duty, exceeding his authority or failing to fulfill his responsibilities.[2]
