Sunday, May 30, 2021

Retaining Your Rights as a Medford Citizen: What You Need to Know, What You Need to DO

 YOUR RIGHT TO KNOW WHAT GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ARE UP TO


    I'm in Woburn and someone in a restaurant sees me.  They give me some information about this bar and that, The Dockside being a prime suspect. They tell me to take the camera and video a former mayor drinking away.   Don't think I have to give you the name.   So many people give me info on former mayor m.m. it is astounding. They really hate him. He needed to stay in office to maintain the "nice guy" persona that he projected, but now that he is out of the bully pulpit those he hurt are on a rampage.

    "Go up to Andover and photo him living at his daughter's house" the allegation went.  That was about a decade ago, but the question I have is why are people asking me to be the private detective?  No thanks...go follow him yourselves and send photos to the e mails or the p.o. box.

________________________________

Which brings us to 

              Citizen Rights Vs Adam Knight.   

The first clue on Knight came to the P.O. Box, but it was the Text that got me to file a Public Records Request.  When I posted "temper, temper Adam" the blog lit up.   As with Paul Ruseau's dark black past, there were MANY informants.


    Do the simple math: multiple informants on Ruseau, multiple informants on Knight means that these individuals are loathed; the alleged "popularity" exists in their own minds. 


    But the KNIGHT thing is extra troubling. The first informant noted that there's a MASSIVE cover-up going on.  That begs these questions:


...who the hell is protecting Adam Knight beyond Caraviello?  And Why?   And what is in it for Caraviello?   The answer is pretty simple, McGlynn's boys on the council Knight, Scarpelli, Falco and Caraviello are dwindling. Freddy "Krueger" Dello Russo is not there for Mike anymore, and citizens are being shielded from seeing what Adam Knight did on April 1, 2021 to benefit the puppet master, not Knight.    End Part 1.

0 comments: