Untrustworthy Attorney Osborne allegedly owns a Jaguar, allegedly is living beyond his means, and allegedly paid himself from city funds. Allegedly.
He didn't think to sell the Jag, did he? So - allegedly - he just took city funds so he didn't have to supplement his income with "private legal work," and diminish the few alleged hours the public is aware of that he actually (allegedly) does ANY WORK OF SIGNIFICANCE AT ALL FOR HIS ENORMOUS PAYCHECK that just isn't quite enough!
"Neil then stated he was glad that the appeals stipends existed because if they didn't, he would need to supplement his income with private legal work outside
of city employment,"
City Solicitor Scanlon and/or Public Records Officer
Medford City Hall
85 George P. Hassett Drive
Medford MA 02155
Re: Massachusetts Public Records Request on Neil Osborne, Acting Director of Human Resources / Diversity Director
Dear Attorney Scanlon and Office of the City Clerk:
This
is a request under the Massachusetts Public Records Law (M. G. L.
Chapter 66, Section 10). I am requesting that I be provided a copy of
the following records:
1)The document giving permission to
Neil Osborne to post his legal title on Linked In
This is like when ex city solicitor was posting his government address
on the
Immaculate Conception church website.
These individuals, both
lawyers, play fast and loose with what is right and moral,
and they point the fingers at the residents of Massachusetts who "see
it, say it," as ex Chief Sacco instructed us all to do.
2)The document that shows that Neil Osborne pays Medford Excise Tax on his light blue Jaguar.
3)Is
Mr. Osborne's Jaguar registered as being in Medford? Is there a
document from the Registry of Motor Vehicles that Medford has?
4)The
document filed in the city clerk's office for a defendant in a
complaint (or, more specifically, the accused) to respond to a
complainant while - clearly - being in conflict
I filed a complaint against Richard F. Caraviello, current city council
president, and Neil Osborne. Did Mr. Osborne file in the ethics log in
the city clerk's office that he was directly responding to a complaint
from a member of the public that was complaining about him? This seems
to be
a massive conflict of interest. I would like to see
the log in the clerk's office where Mr. Osborne was upfront with the
public about his conflict.
5)In the Medford
Transcript 6/24/21 it noted something about Mr. Osborne being the
subject of an ethics investigation by the city of Medford.
I would like a copy of that document to publish to my readers.
6)All
documents displaying how Mr. Osborne paid himself via the stipends and
other monies noted in the Transcript article of 6/24/21
Also in the 6/24/21 article Mr. Osborne is quoted by Michael Durham as
saying he couldn't afford to work (owning a Jaguar,) unless he
wrote money out to himself, allegedly. Here's the quote: ""Neil then stated he was glad that the appeals stipends existed because if they didn't,
he would need to supplement his income with private legal work outside
of city employment," wrote Durham in a complaint to Rodrigues in October 2020 about the missing funds.
by Nunley Benjamin, "Neil had been
paying himself during that block of time."
The documents requested are the ones proving Osborne paid himself "during that block of time."
7)This
writer prevailed over Disability chair Rachel Tanenhaus and Diversity
Director Osborne with an Open Meeting Law complaint violation.
All I need is a document that Medford City Hall has this on file; I
have the document, of course; this request is to ensure that citizens
can
see the document at Medford City Hall if they need to.
I
recognize that you may charge reasonable costs for copies, as well as
for personnel time needed to comply with this request however, this is
of GREAT public interest and you know my resume,
published
in books, quoted all over the place including but not limited to The
New York Times, Boston Globe, etc. etc. etc. thus I request you waive
all fees for the public good, and that I am an
esteemed
member of the music press, and have been for decades, despite being
discriminated against by Rick Caraviello when it comes to sitting at the
journalist table at city hall. They have
high
school journalists (allegedly) and cub reporters yet they retaliate
and discriminate against a journalist who finds the truth about them.
If Caraviello, Osborne, Knight, Rumley et. al had nothing
to hide, they wouldn't be so downright vicious and intentionally malicious.
Mayor Lungo-Koehn take note of the above paragraph. Thank you
The
Public Records Law requires you to provide me with a written response
within 10 business days. If you cannot comply with my request, you are
statutorily required to provide an explanation in writing.
Please send via e mail
Sincerely,
Joe Viglione
0 comments:
Post a Comment