Conflicted Government Official Neil Osborne responds to a complaint on Neil Osborne. They impudence of these rogue officials; it's such a pattern in Medford. A "presentment" letter is what you have to send city hall in anticipation of a lawsuit. That is what I am hiring a lawyer to put together. Enough is enough
City Solicitor Scanlon
Medford City Hall
85 George P. Hassett Drive
Medford MA 02155
Fri, Aug 6 at 12:34 PM
Dear Atty Scanlon, Madame Mayor:
As
you know, Deborah Ecker phoned me. My first question was if she
intended to help me or attempt to protect Mr. Osborne and the city.
Though
I'm not a lawyer, like any good lawyer, I knew the answer to the
question before it was asked. So I figured, let's collect the evidence, and
then very legally go through the proper avenues to remove the
vindictive and ineffective Mr. Osborne from Medford city government.
That is now my mission.
You know how my work has benefited Medford.
1)On or about July 30, 2021 Neil Osborne responds to my complaint and notes that he was INCLUDED in the complaint. This is as much a conflict of interest as Mark Rumley investigating a 501c3 non-profit that he was twice on the board of.
It is a pattern with the city of Medford
2)The document that arrived in the mail from Mr. Osborne was barely readable. Very unprofessional.
3)That I prevailed in a complaint over the Disability Commission in an Open Meeting Law violation -
naming Rachel Tanenhaus (the chair) and Mr. Osborne is a reason Mr. Osborne is angry, retaliating again, and engaging in an alleged conflict of interest.
Mr. Osborne, like Adam Knight, is a community blight. And how many times have I been right?
All due respect the late Atty Johnny Cochran.
4)I received two bizarre e mails, one defending Neil Osborne, one defending Patrick Gordon.
Not being psychic, just going with my instincts as a journalist, I allege that Osborne wrote the note defending himself, and that Gordon did the same on his own behalf. Sad as it is humorous that they have no real supporters.
Again, I allege this. The community anger at both of those individuals in direct conflict with the defensive e mails.
I am going through the nonsense in the "determination" by conflicted attorney Osborne.
"The city clerk tries to assist him..."
What is Mr. Osborne drinking, and if he's drinking it on the job, fire him.
Mr. Hurtubise, the City Clerk, fraudulently took it upon himself to re-write a petition falsely to have that
other retaliatory individual, Richard Caraviello, throw the petition out. Osborne's delusions are not based
in fact, or reality.
My "perception of past interactions?" Caraviello phoning the police for no reason to evict a resident from
a council meeting (when I was a resident) because the oath of office means nothing to Osborne, Caraviello,
Mark Rumley, Adam Knight, Michael Marks, need I go on? This is a pattern with Medford's unethical politicians, and the entire city knows it. Log into a council meeting with the violations caught on camera... Adam Knight heckling the director of public health during a pandemic on June 1, 2021. I remember some of these transgressions by heart. They are so persistent, they are so flagrant.
The claim of retaliation is real and Osborne taking it upon himself to be conflicted and respond as
heinous as Adam Hurtubise writing fiction and attaching my name to it.
But I thank you for more evidence; I caught Osborne violating the Open Meeting Law, his arrogance
and retaliation sending the exhibit below may go to the Board of Bar Overseers. It IS going to the
Attorney General's office.
I will speak with counsel about taking it to the MCAD.
We expect much more from Mayor Lungo-Koehn and Attorney Scanlon.
As for Attorney Ecker, a prostitute has more honor than some mouthpiece from K-P Law -
is in - KaPut to Victims, "we defend bad conduct at city hall for city hall." Like a professional escort
service, KP Law services the "John" (the city of Medford) in a reckless fashion with no
regard for victims and their rights.
What is laughable is that the discrimination is caught on camera and is evidenced by the
boorish behavior of sub-standard government employees, Osborne, Knight, Hurtubise, Caraviello etc.
This writer is not the only victim. On my Facebook politics page a resident writes for the public:
You
will get a an insulting and dismissive letter from KP Law just like I
did about what the cemetery dept. did to me. I'm not done with them yet.
As Ms. McGuillicuddy posted her name and is not anonymous, let that be Exhibit B, to the Exhibit A attached.
I am talking to one of my attorneys about a presentment letter to the city in advance of a lawsuit
This is part 1.
I will be sending the complaints to the AG and others as well as delving into the malfeasance I allege is in Osborne's outrageous correspondence.
One thing is certain, the city cannot succeed with individuals like Caraviello, Osborne, Knight, Hurtubise messing with civil rights.
Respectfully,
Joe Viglione
EXHIBIT A
Conflicted fraud Neil Osborne responds to a complaint on himself. How boorish.
No one gives a damn about the CORI check at TV3; He takes the point out of context, that grandma and grandpa types and politicians shouldn't be subjected to a CORI check.
My concern is the Policies and Procedures where they can throw anyone out of TV3 on a whim, just like the Harvey Alberg days.
It's sick and disgusting.
0 comments:
Post a Comment