Sunday, July 23, 2017

MAGAZINE FOR SALE

1,O22,216  ALL TIME PAGE VIEWS


HAVE YOU EVER DREAMED OF OWNING YOUR OWN NEWS PUBLICATION?

HAVING A VOICE

MAKING POSITIVE CHANGES IN YOUR CITY


MEDFORD INFO CENTRAL DOT COM IS ONE OF THE MOST POWERFUL NEWS OUTLETS IN THE HISTORY OF MEDFORD

AND YOU CAN BE THE NEW PUBLISHER FOR A MERE $300,000.00

THAT'S RIGHT

THIS POPULAR MEDFORD WEBSITE IS AVAILABLE FOR 300K

THINK OF THE ADVERTISING OPPORTUNITIES

THINK OF YOUR OWN VISION FOR THE CITY OF MEDFORD, MASSACHUSETTS


IT IS A PERFECT VEHICLE TO COMPLEMENT ANY LIMOUSINE COMPANY OR TO PROMOTE A HIGH SCHOOL

CONTACT RICHARD F. BELSON
FOR MORE DETAILS


MEDFORD INFORMATION CENTRAL DOT COM IS A REGISTERED BUSINESS IN THE CITY OF MEDFORD.

IF WE GO TO THE CLERK'S OFFICE TO SIGN THE BUSINESS OVER, PLEASE DO AS RETIRED ATTORNEY SKERRY P. DAVID SAID TO THE CURRENT OWNER:

"YOU'D BETTER BRING A BODY GUARD"

MR. EDWARD P. FINN IS NO FAN OF THIS MAGAZINE, 
WHICH IS ALL THE BETTER FOR YOU!  
THE MORE YOU CRITICIZE OLD ED,
THE MORE READERSHIP YOU OBTAIN!



Pageviews today
91
Pageviews yesterday
541
Pageviews last month
19,261
Pageviews all time history
1,022,216
 @ 10:58 PM

Lebert Fallout: 2 years ago THIS WEEK - Medford Oregon Police DISTANCE themselves from Medford Mass

1,022,204 @ 10:34 PM
79 IN 154 MINUTES!
_______________________________
MEDFORD OREGON POLICE DEPARTMENT DOES NOT WANT ANYONE TO THINK THAT THEY ENGAGE IN THE LEBERT STYLE OF POLICING!


Medford Police
There is a video circling the internet about a "Medford Detective" getting into an off duty traffic dispute with a citizen. This was NOT our agency, and appears to be Medford, Massachusetts. We don't want anyone mistakenly thinking that was us.
Thanks and have a good night.
GOOD ONE CHIEF SACCO
EVEN THE THIN BLUE WALL RUNS AWAY FROM SACCO AND CREW...ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE UNITED STATES THEY DON'T WANT TO BE MENTIONED IN THE SAME BREATH WITH CHIEF SACCO'S DEPT.


HOW UGLY IS THAT?

LINK TO PAGE HERE: 

FROM BROTHERS IN BLUE, THEY ARE DISTANCING THEMSELVES FROM 
SACCO'S CREW

 Eric Mitton As someone who has lived in both Medfords, I am NOT surprised to know that this is the MA one and not the OR one.


4 · July 28, 2015 at 12:48am Kathie Farnham Hey I lived in both also!!!



YA THINK THE OREGON POLICE CHIEF'S SON WOULD GET HIS GUN TAKEN AWAY, AND HIS TRUCK, AND NOT GET A BREATHALYZER

?????


DEMOCRACY DIES IN DARKNESS

1,022,051@ 5:59 
1,021,941 @ 1:40 PM

The Washington Post has as its slogan / tagline "Democracy Dies in Darkness" and the city of Medford is proof of that. McGlynn's Media Blackout is in full force, 

...but with the news that Michael J. McGlynn allegedly is now at war with Stephanie Muccini-Burke, that media blackout wall is showing some cracks. 

Sure, they are both keeping public access away from citizens illegally, an abuse of the term "issuing authority" where Muccini-Burke has full access to the cablespace DENYING the citizens paying the freight. Muccini-Burke's arrogance and deceit are the most transparent thing about her.


Democracy Dies in DARKNESS. We need to GET OUT THE VOTE and have a CLASS ACTION SUIT that residents can comprehend, sign, and see where city hall is ripping them off.


JUNE 25, 1987, 30 YEARS AGO
The Beverly Hills City Council has approved a franchise agreement with Century Southwest Cable Television Inc. that requires the company to spend $4.5 million to improve the aging system.
Vice Mayor Donna Ellman described the agreement, approved Tuesday by a 3-2 vote, as the "best of all worlds."

"It is an outstanding document that if we ever have to go to court will hold us in very good position," she said.


The council's action was taken after months of delays. A 13-member citizens committee studied the contract for more than a year and voted to recommend approval of the agreement.
Several members of the citizens group opposed the contract because they said that the company had provided inadequate financial information.
Opponents wanted the city to take control of the cable system.
Ellen Tern Harris, a member of the committee who opposed the agreement, said the city could have contracted with the telephone company to upgrade the system and hired a cable company to manage it.

http://articles.latimes.com/1987-06-25/news/we-10549_1_beverly-hills-city-council


Pageviews today
357
Pageviews yesterday
365
Pageviews last month
19,464

Pageviews all time history
1,021,941   1:40 PM

MARK 'ERASERHEAD' RUMLEY THE E STANDS FOR...


THEY ARE ATTEMPTING TO CONTROL FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND THEY HAVE MARK E. RUMLEY (THE E. STANDS FOR ERASERHEAD) TRYING TO ERASE YOUR VOICE

HERE'S A LAWYER WHO TOOK AN OATH OF OFFICE AS WELL AS AN OATH TO BE A LAWYER, AND LOOK AT THE LIE HE TOLD A RETIRED JUDGE

“The one sentiment that I have heard that I take great exception to is that the city is trying to limit speech,” said Rumley. “The notion the city would censor or squelch free speech is baseless and as city solicitor I would find any such effort repugnant.”


http://freespeechmedford.blogspot.com/

TO ACCESS THE SITE QUICKLY JUST
PUT 'RUMLEY REPUGNANT' IN GOOGLE

THANK YOU

http://freespeechmedford.blogspot.com/

Monday, June 11, 2012

ELITIST McGLYNN CRONYISM DENYING FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS

This is about the elitist Government Control of Access TV and the news media. Even the print media seems to fear the Mayor as they have to "do business" in the city. So much for standing up for what is right.  So much for integrity in journalism.   So much for ethics!

Boston Globe Editorial Board in Mayor McGlynn's back pocket? Why?



Here's the Globe's disgraceful editorial which we believe is factually incorrect and squelches Free Speech in Medford

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2009/08/15/almost_famous_in_medford/ 

 
___________________________________________________
City Councilor Bob Penta called them "SICK". HE IS CORRECT!

___________________________________________________________________________
Listen to City Solicitor Mark E. Rumley make a false and fictitious statement to the citizens of Medford:



City Solicitor Mark E. Rumley / Medford Daily Mercury 
on or about Nov. 16, 2008 (quoted from the 2nd Judge Jackson-Thompson hearing) saying:

“The one sentiment that I have heard that I take great exception to is that the city is trying to limit speech,” said Rumley. “The notion the city would censor or squelch free speech is baseless and as city solicitor I would find any such effort repugnant.”
Hey Mark -
Lip service is so unbecoming.
Some of us are doing the heavy lifting...and you ain't included in that group!
yer included in this group:

(Ain't - Are Incredibly Nonsensical & Tiresome) 

The Hard Copy Petition to Remove Roy Belson

1,021,924 @ 1:23 pm

I RE-POSTED THIS ON THE FACEBOOK PAGE.

IN LIGHT OF ROY E. BELSON'S SHENANIGANS WITH THE ALLEGED
CHAPTER 74 BOGUS RADIO / TV CABLE COMMISSION OR WHATEVER THE HELL HE IS CALLING IT THIS WEEK...

THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 0R SECRETARY OF STATE OR BOTH NEED TO ADDRESS BELSON'S UNDERHANDED TACTICS WHEN IT COMES TO THE MONIES SUPPLIED BY CABLE TV SUBSCRIBERS.

I CALLED FOR THE CITY COUNCIL TO BE THE ISSUING AUTHORITY, NOT MCGLYNN OR MUCCINI-BURKE

THERE'S A MEDFORD MEDIA BLACKOUT, WHICH IS WHY THIS NEWS SITE IS SO POPULAR

THEY ARE ATTEMPTING TO CONTROL FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND THEY HAVE MARK E. RUMLEY (THE E. STANDS FOR ERASERHEAD) TRYING TO ERASE YOUR VOICE


I am in full support of requesting that the Medford School Committee create a succession plan for the Superintendent of schools by June 2016. I am also requesting that the process be a transparent and open process.


*This will be brought up at the May 16, 2016 school committee meeting for those who are interested in attending.
Name                             E-mail Address                       Phone Number                   

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________I am in full support of requesting that the Medford School Committee create a succession plan for the Superintendent of schools by June 2016. I am also requesting that the process be a transparent and open process.
*This will be brought up at the May 16, 2016 school committee meeting for those who are interested in attending.
Name                             E-mail Address                       Phone Number                   
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________I am in full support of requesting that the Medford School Committee create a succession plan for the Superintendent of schools by June 2016. I am also requesting that the process be a transparent and open process.
*This will be brought up at the May 16, 2016 school committee meeting for those who are interested in attending.
Name                             E-mail Address                       Phone Number                   
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Monday's Editorial on McKillop/McGlynn: WHO WILL RAT OUT WHOM ON THE STOLEN ELECTION OF 2015

I'm taking my sweet time with this editorial, but it should be ready for Monday morning.

How the hell can Stephanie Burke or Mike McGlynn, if they really have split, which I informed you readers of eighteen months ago with the high school blogger, Ms. Evangelista, when the not-so-dynamic duo bickered allegedly over that hire... if they really have split, how the hell can they not rat one or the other out on the stolen election of 2015???

And how do you steal it again in 2017 when two opposing forces both know the formula?

Here's a little hint about Monday's story, I have a little public records request going out to get information to blow open the stolen election of 2015, and here's an even bigger hint:

That public records request is NOT going to Medford City Hall or Medford High School.


They have no idea what it is, but I can assure you, once we get the documents, there will be rats scurrying off sinking ships.


They have no idea what I am asking, they have no idea how incredible the information will be, and they have no idea what the legal consequences will be for them!

THIS is going to be FUN, Mahk!*


*P.S. this is NOT the public records request going out on Matt Page Lieberman's best friend, Adam Knight.  THAT little gem ought to get the union boy off of the city council when revealed.  And that is NOT going to Medford City Hall OR Medford High School neither(sic!)*

Neither...as in double negative, because Madame Knight IS a walking double negative.

Mr. Rumley Needs to Step Down; Citizens Laughing at a Solicitor Repeatedly Is NOT good for Medford

Nathaniel Hawthorne

“No man, for any considerable period, can wear one face to himself and another to the multitude, without finally getting bewildered as to which may be the true.

Robert Louis Stevenson

Examine critically with particular reference to the language, the theme of man's duality in R L Stevenson's The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde The story ..

So many citizens, from Medford Square to Tempone Manor show little or no respect for a city solicitor.

We don't see the same buffoonery in Woburn, in Somerville, in towns like Stoneham and Winchester when it comes to the legal department in those cities and towns.

So why should Medford suffer the consequences of a lawyer who makes up his own rules and behaves badly?


It just isn't fair, and there is not a scintilla of honor in behavior which mirrors Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, because as the great literary historian and dear, departed friend of mine Ray McNally noted in the final interview I did with Ray (over about a 25 year period) at TV3, Medford,  Jekyll and Hyde were one and the same.

The kindly Dr. Jekyll (Jeee-kill, correct pronunciation) was running and "hyding" behind the dark mask.

Read writer Greg Buzwell's take on it and apply it to how Mark E. Rumley says one thing in contradiction to his actions; Mr. Rumley's actions (failing to press charges on MCC TV3) and his hyperbole and theatrics are always in conflict, leaving the taxpayers of Medford holding the bag with...nothing in it.... for the money they pay Rumley.
___________________________________

‘Man is not truly one, but truly two’: duality in Robert Louis Stevenson’s Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde

Curator Greg Buzwell considers duality in Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, exploring how the novel engages with contemporary debates about evolution, degeneration, consciousness, homosexuality and criminal psychology.
Robert Louis Stevenson’s Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (1886) is a late-Victorian variation on ideas first raised in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818). Stevenson’s monster, however, is not artificially created from stitched-together body parts, but rather emerges fully formed from the dark side of the human personality. 

MY PERSONAL OPINION, BASED ON INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IS THAT THE MORE MR. RUMLEY TRIES TO APPEAR BENEVOLENT AND CARING, AND THE MORE HIS ACTIONS BETRAY HIM, THAT HE EMERGES AS ONE OF THE MOST SINISTER INDIVIDUALS IN ALL OF MEDFORD.

ABSOLUTELY SINISTER.

YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THE 501C3 FIZZLING PRESIDENT IS ALL ABOUT, MEAN, ANGRY AND UNABLE TO CONTROL HIS TEMPER.   HE'S EASY TO EXPOSE.

BUT RUMLEY, RUMLEY - WHO SAT ON A BOARD WITH THAT INDIVIDUAL, IS ANOTHER MATTER ALL TOGETHER.

BY FEIGNING HE IS OH SO CHARITABLE, AND BY FAILING TO DO ANYTHING OF SUBSTANCE, WE CAN SEE THE PERSONIFICATION OF SINISTER

sinister
1

adjstemming from evil characteristics or forces; wicked or dishonorable

“"the scheme of some sinister intelligence bent on punishing him"-Thomas Hardy”
Synonyms:
blackdark
evil
morally bad or wrong





________________________________
For all his alleged care and concern, when the false charges were filed on a homosexual senior citizen after he was physically assaulted by an extremely VIOLENT ex football player, Ed Finn, the outwardly gregarious Rumley behaving like such a "people person," has a dark side, and that dark side emerges like the hour hand on a clock, creeping slowly, ever so slowly, till you notice that it is not 3 O'clock, it is now 4.  By surprise, the true nature of the individual reveals itself.

Hold up a mirror and he can't see his own reflection.

Robert Louis Stevenson was right!


Definitions ofgregarious

1

adjinstinctively or temperamentally seeking and enjoying the company of others

Nathaniel Hawthorne
“No man, for any considerable period, can wear one face to himself and another to the multitude, without finally getting bewildered as to which may be the true.

____________________________________________
A judge threw Rumley OFF the witness stand for "irrelevant" testimony.   Testimony aimed at  hurting and besmirching the man that Mark loathes and despises: this writer.


These Caraviello types have absolutely no shame, gaming the system, ignoring civil rights, stomping on free speech and other God-given and Constitution-bred freedoms.



Man's Duality in R.L. Stevenson's The Strange Case of Dr.... | Bartleby

https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Mans-Duality-in-R-L-Stevensons-The-P3J2KUUYTC

Examine critically with particular reference to the language, the theme of man's duality in R L Stevenson's The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde The story ...

The theme of The Duality of Human Nature in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde ...

www.litcharts.com/lit/dr-jekyll-and-mr-hyde/themes/the-duality-of-human-nature

Get everything you need to know about The Duality of Human Nature in Dr. Jekyll and ... Robert Louis Stevenson ... The Duality of Human Nature Theme Icon.

How does Robert Louis Stevenson explore the theme of duality in Dr ...

https://iproductions1337.wordpress.com/.../how-does-robert-louis-stevenson-explore-t...

Jul 2, 2010 - In this essay I will try to explain the influences of the Victorian world and how it links to the theme of duality in Jekyll and Hyde. At the time that ...
Exploring the theme of duality, contradictions, deceptions will help you understand Medford, Massachusetts politics.

Awake oh sleeping giant, citizens of Medford.  Rise up and vote the bastards out of office.

________________________________________________ 

Mark Rumley and Rick Caraviello restrict your civil rights, and will shake your hand while stabbing you in the back.
_________________________________________


10:06 PM
My response to more of Rumley's deceptive correspondence:


Dear Mr. Rumley,

You told retired Judge Jackson-Thompson you are the free speech advocate.  Why not let me talk?  You can always hit delete.
Do you often say one thing in conflict with your actions?  You don't have to answer rhetorical questions, they are for the benefit of others in this community who - honestly, Mark, I say this without any malice, just objectivity, others who laugh at you.  Especially your ten dollar words.   I'm serious...this is just what others say to me about you.

The writings are to get information on public record. 

They are not for your amusement, Mr. Rumley, they are my volunteer efforts to enlighten the public.

And, actually, Mr. Rumley, my writings have:

1)Helped remove the former mayor's uncle from the Housing Authority   As I recall, you jumped up to object when I was taping the event; you stated it was a separate "body politic" yet your knee-jerk reaction was an attempt to stifle my free speech, which resulted in the removal of a board member

a)You called it a separate body from city hall, but your actions - again - were in conflict with your words.  

b)Your claim of finding the city controlling free speech "repugnant" was not honest; you tried to stifle my free speech at the housing authority having about as much power as the wicked witch in Munchkinland: none.

______________________________________
2)Finally brought down TV3; something you were required to do for the citizens of this municipality harassed and threatened by brutes and thugs   Funny how you get hundreds of thousands of dollars for NOT doing your job, I do the job and get sued or litigated against. Funny how that works. Not.
_____________________________________

3)My exploration into Bob Maiocco's troubles at Wells Fargo enlightened a city council he buffaloed.  Mr. Maiocco resigned, perhaps not-so-coincidentally after my articles effectively informed his council colleagues of what should be considered wrongful conduct by Maiocco
_________________________________
4)You claim not to despise or loathe me, yet your documented e mails to one of my lawyers where - incredibly - you warn him to stay away from his client (I have paid that particular lawyer a LOT of money, your crude and abusive act could have resulted in money loss for a fellow brother lawyer.)

What would possess a city lawyer to take it upon himself to tell a brother lawyer to stay away from a long-time friend and client?
Clearly, a city solicitor terrified that a smart pro se litigant also has a number of smart lawyers around him.

...you allowed a vicious, malicious lawsuit to go forward knowing that it was baseless.  Indeed, the night of the arraignment when a judge gave me PERMISSION to speak at the council prior to my being victorious over the dishonest councilor, Caraviello, who filed the malicious action, the police showed up.

As I recall, you and Mr. Caraviello were outside Alden Chambers with three officers of the law.  When I told Officer Ghilain that the judge gave me PERMISSION to attend council meetings, you were beet red, angry and ready to go Vesuvius...  allegedly, you and Mr. Caraviello were attempting to buffalo the police into thinking you had a restraining order on an innocent man when you did not.

I did hear from a politician last night on my phone (Not Marks, Lungo-Koehn or Penta, keep guessing) congratulating me on my investigation into the McKillop/.McGlynn alleged "partnership."  That person made a statement that  ..."Rumley fears you."

Given your penchant for belittling Michael Marks or my late friend Pat Fiorello (the guy passed away and you and Mr. Camuso were labeling me as a man with Alzheimer's...that was truly below the belt) or your quoting Frank PIlleri who calls everyone and the lamp post "delusional," I see a city solicitor who has long worn out his welcome.

As I am a forgiving man I would absolutely meet you for coffee the moment you resign, even interview you on my radio show on the good things you have done for our community, few as they may be.

However, as long as you remain in an office where you are a detriment to this municipality, with God as my judge, I will continue to write, investigate and demonstrate to this community the very bad things your interference in city matters have accomplished, and how Mark Rumley is not a public servant, but part of a truly sick cabal of insiders who have gamed the system, robbed us of true access television, and who allow violent acts as Mr. Finn engaged in, or underhanded lies to the police, as Caraviello engaged in, and think nothing of their moral obligation to the taxpayers of this city.

A person you know said to me "You got rid of Uncle Gene, you'll get rid of Frank Pilleri."   

Adam Knight purportedly said to Michael Marks "F...ng Joe Vig's blog got rid of the mayor"  (as dirty a mouth as Brian S. Burke)

Mr. Marks told me that he replied "Yesss.....and now he's coming for you."

Truer words were never spoken!

My writings continue.  And with the effective way that my Facebook live events have given citizens a new way to see city government at work, I am quite sure I can accomplish my new goals - the removal of Belson, Muccini-Burke, Rumley, the Camuso clan and other jokers from city government.

Where's our tv station, Mark?  Muccini-Burke got your tongue?  Be a man, do your job.  


Give us our access television this week.

Joe Viglione