Sunday, June 27, 2021

BREAKING: LETTER ON COUNCIL CONFLICT TO THE MAYOR: Falco Conflicted with 6/25/21 Vote Against the Mayor? ... 128 days from June 27, 2021 to November 2, 2021

1290 page views  @ 4:37 pm 49 in 12 minutes

1241 @ 4:25 pm page views since 8 pm last night

 

 Falco Conflicted with 6/25/21 Vote Against the Mayor?'

 ... 128 days from June 27, 2021 to November 2, 2021

 


 

Adam Hurtubise
City Clerk
85 George P. Hassett Drive
Medford MA 02155

To the City Clerk:

Is there not a booklet / 3 ring binder that city councilors and others must place information in if there is a conflict of interest?

John Falco, who allegedly had a fundraiser at Raso's today, June 27, 2021, is running against Mayor Lungo-Koehn.
On Friday, June 25, 2021, didn't Mr. Falco take a VOTE against the mayor?  To have the city spend $15,000 or so to
investigate his opponent?

Is it ethical for a politician to vote for monies to harass his opponent?
 
Are you, as city clerk, required to file with the State Ethics Commission when this occurs?

1:25 in George Scarpelli gives a "run down" like some grand inquisitor when it doesn't seem to be the place of the city council to discuss this matter

2)Scarpelli claims to have gotten a phone call asking "Are we doing enough on the council"  ?????

3: 1:46  What our boundaries are, what we can and what we can't do."  Duh, ya think?

4) It's being held (information) by the Administration, I don't think we've been given the information

2:00 minutes in:
5)Open Meeting Law Process (3 complaints currently pending against council for OML alleged violations)  All the parties who have been named were invited here this evening

6)I don't see anyone from the city administration here to talk about some serious allegations

7)Leaves us with our hands tied.  (QUESTION: City Council has no jurisdiction over TV3, has no jurisdiction over this matter, right?   JV)

8)Personally reaching out to see what legal avenues we can do, personally  (How about not blocking the investigation into Adam Knight, George?)

9)The Council has to make a decision with what avenues we are going to go with  (Investigate your own, George, Adam Knight and Caraviello and their lies)

10)Even if it means making tough decisions, walking a fine line  (what is Scarpelli babbling about?  The rape or rapes in Otis Mass when he was a chaperone?)

11)Scarpelli "I'm sick of talking in riddles' (unless it is the rapes where Scarpelli was so negligent)


 How fat are Bears and Scarpelli put together

Rumley Shows up

"Is there any procedural reason why we can't go forward in this night in some fashion?   We have none?

Knight says Medford city Council requested our legal counsel, unable to represent us this evening.  No lawyer, whole purpose of this meeting was to sit down and address a series of complaints...

Two members of a Federally protected class.  Knight says Council doesn't have the experience or the tools.  "I'm a little confused as to ...why this is such a shadow (Like your criminal investigation, public figure, Knight)  We don't know what our options are...

Rumley: I expect that, Councilor.  The frustration of the two people I represent.   From Tuesday evening to Wednesday then it goes over to tonight. 



8:44 Rumley keeps yapping though Patricia Brady Doherty wants to speak

15 minutes in - Michael Marks talks about Executive Session, if they aren't present,

they can't have an Executive Session.   Criminally investigated Adam Knight claims you only have to send notice for Open Meeting law

Marks doesn't see a reason why they can't go in  

Patricia Brady Doherty calls Solicitor Scanlon "conflicted"

17 minutes in

"You people are right in there I don't know why you're not in Executive Session talking about how to protect yourselves"

'No one should be giving you legal advice that's in city hall"

3rd "I don't understand ...just hire an attorney and duke it out with city hall to get the bill paid. That's what I'd do if I were sitting on the city council."

_________________________________

Bears:18:33 discusses that they talked about getting money for a loyal

Adam Knight's GOTCHA MOMENT on himself

18:55 this isn't to tar and feather anybody, it's to get to the bottom of it, to make sure (that) employees that are working for employees working in this .....aren't subjected to hostile aggression"

LIKE ADAM KNIGHT THREATENING ME, BEING HOSTILE WHILE PEOPLE ARE SPEAKING AND VIOLATING RULE 9?

LIKE THAT ADAM KNIGHT...YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO SPEAK AND SINCE YOU ARE UNDER CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION YOU SHOULD RECUSE YOURSELF

____________________________________________
 ADAM KNIGHT: "WE NEED TO KNOW THE FACTS, WE NEED TO KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON.  WE DON'T RIGHT NOW!"

IS HE TALKING ABOUT THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION INTO HIS WANTON DESTRUCTION OF A BANK DOOR AND ALLEGEDLY FLEEING THE SCENE OF THE ALLEGED CRIME?

___________________________________________

20:50 patricia brady doherty "I don't have a dog in this fight; I care very much how the city council is being portrayed!"


THE WOMAN WHO ALLEGEDLY LIVES IN N.H, USES A MEDFORD ADDRESS, AND MAY BE RUNNING FOR MAYOR.  SHE ABSOLUTELY HAS A DOG IN THIS FIGHT

____________________________________________

0 comments: