When Ed Finn Censored Petitions to the Council, the City was Caught Limiting Speech

THE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN CABLE TV FEES PUT INTO THE GENERAL FUND? IS THIS A SECOND TIER TAX, AND SHOULD THE CITIZENS BE REFUNDED FOR THE DECEPTION, WITH INTEREST?

THIS WRITER WAS NOT THE ONLY VICTIM OF UGLY ED FINN'S UGLY CENSORSHIP.

ANOTHER SENIOR CITIZEN FOUND HIS PETITIONS ALTERED BY SLEAZY ED FINN

MARK RUMLEY IS SUCH A LIAR!

ED FINN LIMITED SPEECH AND RUMLEY KNEW IT.

DID RUMLEY VIOLATE HIS OATH OF OFFICE WITH  HIS STATEMENT TO THE RETIRED JUDGE, WHILE AWARE OF FINN'S MISCONDUCT, KNOWINGLY TURNING A BLIND EYE TO CLERK FINN'S CENSORSHIP PRACTICES LIMITING SPEECH IN MEDFORD, 

THE SAME WAY THAT RUMLEY CALLED TV3 'EQUAL OPPORTUNITY SLAPPERS' YET FAILED TO CALL OUT HIS FELLOW BOARD MEMBERS AT MCC FOR THE RACISM, HOMOPHOBIA BY STEVE MARRA AND OTHERS, THE CENSORSHIP POLICIES OF TV3?

RUMLEY IS A FRAUD AND SHOULD BE UNDER INVESTIGATION, SUSPENDED AND PUT ON TRIAL!

City Solicitor Mark E. Rumley / Medford Daily Mercury on or about Nov. 16, 2008 (quoted from the 2nd Judge Jackson-Thompson hearing) saying:

“The one sentiment that I have heard that I take great exception to is that the city is trying to limit speech,” said Rumley. “The notion the city would censor or squelch free speech is baseless and as city solicitor I would find any such effort repugnant.”

RUMLEY REFUSED TO ALLOW

PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTERS AT THE LIBRARY

WITH HIS SCAM ARTICLE IN 

THE MEDFORD TRANSCRIPT

RUMLEY WANTS A CORI CHECK

WHEREVER THERE IS PUBLIC ACCESS

ED FINN SCREWED PETITIONERS TO THE CITY COUNCIL

THE PUBLIC SERVANT SERVED THE CROOKED MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL

NOT THE CITIZENS PAYING HUGE TAXES

AND THE DOUBLE DIP OF STEALING THE

ACCESS TV FUNDS AS A 'SECOND TIER TAX"

WE SUBMIT THAT UNKNOWING TAXPAYERS

PAY A SECOND TIER TAX WHEN

THE CABLE TV FRANCHISE FEE

GOES INTO THE BLACK HOLE OF

THE GENERAL FUND

AND TO PAY SALARIES FOR

JACK DEMPSEY, LISA DUNPHY, ALLISON GOLDSBERRY\

THE MONEY SHOULD BE REFUNDED

TO THE CITIZENS...WITH INTEREST

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/4961

26 U.S. Code § 4961 - Abatement of second tier taxes where there is correction

• US Code
• Notes

prev | next

(a)General rule

If any taxable event is corrected during the correction period for such event, then any second tier tax imposed with respect to such event (including interest, additions to the tax, and additional amounts) shall not be assessed, and if assessed the assessment shall be abated, and if collected shall be credited or refunded as an overpayment.

(b)Supplemental proceeding

If the determination by a court that the taxpayer is liable for a second tier tax has become final, such court shall have jurisdiction to conduct any necessary supplemental proceeding to determine whether the taxable event was corrected during the correction period. Such a supplemental proceeding may be begun only during the period which ends on the 90th day after the last day of the correction period. Where such a supplemental proceeding has begun, the reference in the second sentence of section 6213(a) to a final decision of the Tax Court shall be treated as including a final decision in such supplemental proceeding.