WAKE UP BREANNA LUNGO-KOEHN
GET RID OF THEM ALL, THEY ALL HAVE TO GO
AND PAY THE PRICE
THAT'S WHY THE PEOPLE VOTED FOR YOU
PERIOD.
THANK GOD BURKE DID NOT GET RE-ELECTED, BETWEEN MCGLYNN, BURKE AND THE COVER-UP, INTENTIONAL COVER-UP OF MASSIVE FRAUD, THEN A NEW POLICE CHIEF SAYS THESE ARE HONEST MEN AND WOMEN...THIS JUSTIFIES EVERYTHING THAT I'VE BEEN SAYING ABOUT THE COVER-UP AT CITY HALL, RUMLEY, BURKE HIDING IT FOR THE ELECTION, POINT THE FINGER AT FORMER MAYOR MCGLYNN, ALL THE MONIES BEING SPENT TO UPGRADE BUILDINGS MCGLYNN LET FALL APART, AND THEN THEY PUT
ex MAYOR MCGLYNN'S PICTURE UP?
_____________________________________
HARRY - shame on you. Protect and Serve?
HARRY Harold MacGilvray YOU TOOK CHIEF SACCO AT HIS WORD? YOU'VE KNOWN ABOUT SACCO'S DECEPTIVE BUSINESS PRACTICES WITH STEVE LEBERT, HOW COULD YOU TRUST HIM AGAIN?
IF HE SCREWED YOU ONCE, SHAME ON HIM.
TWICE, HARRY, IT FALLS ON YOU.
Protect and Serve? The journalist in me knew that you guys knew based on information and belief - this police force needs to be deconstructed and people should damn well know that there'd be no Boston Globe article without my tenacious efforts to release the L'Italien Report - which City Hall claims they mailed but is NOT in my P.O. box yet. Mike McGlynn has friends at the Globe and loves to do a little self-inoculation
Harold MacGilvray, president of the Medford Police Patrolmen’s Association, the union that represents officers, told the outside investigator that Sacco had assured him “he was gonna handle it, and when it was handled that that would be the end of it,” according to the report. MacGilvray also said Sacco’s assurances prompted the officers to be more candid about their actions.
The assignments at issue were late evening and overnight details for construction work scheduled from late February until late April 2018, according to the investigation. Officers initially received $50 per hour for the detail. That figure increased to $60 per hour in April 2018.
The report said Sacco learned of pay discrepancies with those detail assignments sometime in late April or early May of 2018, though exactly when and how was unclear. Sacco’s inquiry appeared to be fueled in part by an anonymous letter that many in the department speculated was written by an officer who had been disciplined years earlier for misconduct on a paid detail. After receiving the letter, Sacco sent a department wide e-mail reminding officers of the rules and policies regarding paid details.
