Mark Rumley's Folly - as in Gabby Folly-Sumney and the Unprofessional Cable Advisory Boards

DOES RUMLEY'S ANTI-FIRST AMENDMENT CORI CHECK CONSTITUTE PRIOR RESTRAINT?
http://medfordinformationcentral.blogspot.com/2018/03/how-impartial-is-mark-e-rumley.html

pri·or re·straint

noun

1. LAW

   judicial suppression of material that would be published or broadcast, on the grounds that it is libelous or harmful. In US law, the First Amendment severely limits the ability of the government to do this.

DEMAREST VS ATHOL/ORANGE INDICATES THAT IT DOES, ACCORDING TO MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE JUDGE'S RULING

[7] It should be noted that the plaintiffs make a very plausible argument that the Release Form Provision constitutes a prior restraint. 

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/188/82/2576984/

fol·ly

ˈfälē/

noun

1. 1.

   lack of good sense; foolishness.

   
   

   "an act of sheer folly"

   • 
     
2. 2.

   a costly ornamental building with no practical purpose, especially a tower or mock-Gothic ruin built in a large garden or park.

MARK RUMLEY'S INDECENT ATTACKS ON FREE EXPRESSION, LIMITING SPEECH IN MEDFORD, IS A CAUSE FOR THE 17 YEAR MEDFORD ATTORNEY TO BE REMOVED FROM CITY HALL FOR ALLEGEDLY VIOLATING HIS OATH OF OFFICE due to Mark E. Rumley's violation of the U.S. Constitution that he swore to uphold and protect.  What a nasty individual.