635,478 @ 12:37 pm
635,443 @ 12:21 pmCity government in Medford attempted to stifle free speech in our city.
They do NOT want this news site to get tips from people showing up at Council chambers, or for us to peacefully take video.
A judge ruled today that we have permission to cover City Council meetings. Again.
A big FIRST AMENDMENT WIN for the citizens of Medford.
This is the 2nd attempt by City government to stifle a resident from participating in city government.
Without my peaceful camera taking video, the citizens would not have this information that city hall just does not want you to have. They do not want you to be informed.
Also, they were not truthful about the situation
They said that I have attended "every" city council meeting * (and what does that have to do with the price of eggs? - oh, that's right, city hall doesn't one ANYONE at the council meetings. We are supposed to be quiet and let Adam Knight stumble and mumble his cockamamie nonsense with his reckless abuse of the English language! Please note how Knight's essay in the Transcript is decidedly different from his voice at the council!)
Does anyone recall me being there on Tuesday, February 22nd for the vote on Charter Review?
I was at home typing up the story from the television and didn't have time to speak to members of the audience as there was so much information flowing, as recorded on this news site.
_______________________________
REMEMBER what Judge LaMothe said when I won three times against MCC TV3 in the anti-SLAPP cases: "You're very logical."
Indeed.
