COMPLAINT ALSO FILED WITH THE COURT THAT THE VERY ACT OF STANDING BY THE DOOR AND NOT ALLOWING THE VICTIM TO LEAVE, AS ONE OF THEM ACTUALLY DID AT MEDFORD CITY HALL AS WELL, WAS A VIOLATION OF THE 6 MONTH RESTRAINING ORDER.
THEY IMMEDIATELY VIOLATED THE RESTRAINING ORDER.
THE VICTIM IS REQUESTING THAT CHARGES BE FILED ON BOTH OF THE ABUSIVE INDIVIDUALS IMMEDIATELY FOR HOLDING A VICTIM HOSTAGE.
THE VIDEOTAPE SHOWS THE AMOUNT OF TIME THEY WERE IN THE ROOM WITHOUT THE CLERK/MAGISTRATE THERE AND THE VICTIM WAS SITTING NEXT TO THE CLERK AND COULD NOT GET BY THE TWO ABUSIVE THUGS.
December 20 2016
Dear Ms.XXXXXXXX
On
December 19, 2016 at approximately 2:50 pm in xxxxxxxxxxxxx
on the xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, clerk xxxxxx xxxxxx left me in a hearing
room defenseless against the individual that I filed a complaint of
assault and battery on.
When
I asked her why she did this she apologized and said "I should have let
you leave the hearing room first." Yes, she should have.
Clerks
of courts MUST be held to the highest of standards. Ms xxxxxxx
seemed cavalier and disdainful of my plight. The individual in
question, xxxxx xxxxxx., has harassed a number of individuals
over the years (he operated xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Inc., until
the city of xxxxxxx pulled the license when xxxxxxxx and his gang were
accused of racism.)
If
a person files a complaint on an individual for abuse and the clerks of
the court decide to leave both parties in a room because, purportedly,
clerk xxxxxxxxx could care less and displayed NO CONCERN FOR PUBLIC
SAFETY, then why should a victim go through the effort of seeking
protection?
I
demand a response to this complaint. I am seeking a Motion to
Reconsider and would like it heard in another court house. Clerk xxxxxxxxxxx put me at risk. It was not fair. She is not objective and
her error in judgement was most egregious.
THE VICTIM
