AFTER ALL THESE YEARS, OVER 33 YEARS OF ACCESS TV, AND RUMLEY STILL CAN'T GET THE PAPERWORK RIGHT.
THAT'S BECAUSE HE DOESN'T WANT TO
RUMLEY IS CENSORSHIP CENTRAL AT MEDFORD CITY HALL
HIS 'IN FLUX' AGREEMENTS ARE A WASTE OF TAXPAYER MONEY TO DENY YOU THE RIGHT TO ACCESS TELEVISION
IT'S A CON AND A SCAM
RUMLEY AS CON ARTIST TELLING YOU ONE THING AND DOING ANOTHER
IN FLUX? LIKE HIS CORRUPT BRAIN!
TEN YEARS LATER CON ARTIST RUMLEY IS EXPOSED
City Solicitor Mark E. Rumley / Medford Daily Mercury
on or about Nov. 16, 2008 (quoted from the 2nd Judge Jackson-Thompson hearing) saying:
“The one sentiment that I have heard that I take great exception to is that the city is trying to limit speech,” said Rumley. “The notion the city would censor or squelch free speech is baseless and as city solicitor I would find any such effort repugnant.”
the only thing repugnant here is Mark Rumley himself
Sept 2, 2018 12:38 pm
Medford Transcript
Item Live
Medford Top 10
To Local Media:
I believe that the Medford city lawyer, Mark E. Rumley, has - allegedly - violated his oath of office and his oath to practice law.
Rumley is McGlynn's city lawyer and should have been removed when McGlynn was removed...oh, allegedly "retired," right. And if you believe that, don't read any further because you've already imbibed the Kool-Aid. Of course assimilating the Stephanie doctrine is mandatory in the city with no free speech, no ethics, and suspicious behavior by multiple city officials, from the allegedly "ex" school superintendent (oh, please, just leave already, Roy!) to the dishonest chief of police, Leo A. Sacco Jr. whose son was not arrested when pulled over for alleged drunk driving, January, 2017.
Two years ago, September 1, 2016, I had Mark E. Rumley removed from a witness stand in Somerville District Court with a simple "objection" to the judge.
Mr. Rumley was doing his usual throwing rocks at me from a witness stand, hurling his invective which defended an indefensible stalker.
The victim was there for an extension of a harassment prevention order (HPO) and Rumley had no reason not to go to the judge and be recused from testifying.
The judge called Rumley's testimony "irrelevant" and an attorney with a clue would have known that. Rumley has a clue, he was being malicious, vindictive, and his negativity and hostility cost him - he was embarrassed again, and this time not by Michael Marks shooting arrows at Rumley at the city council, this time it was in a court of law.
I have a LOT of evidence and a LOT to say on this matter.
My goal in the next thirty days is to have an investigation open on the wrongful conduct of Mark Rumley, especially with his absurd interpretation of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution vis-a-vis insane "CORI" checks on candidates who want their own TV show. Once I call out Rumley on his bad judgment, he changes things. First it was that candidates would have a CORI check, now the city will control how much time candidates have without a CORI check.
Yeah, but if a candidate wants his or her own TV show, Mayor Burke will lurk in their background and see if she can do a homophobic robo call to lie about anyone not in her camp. It's sick, and Rumley is a big part of that sordid puzzle.
Mark Rumley has stood there to stop Medford residents from having a voice on TV3 while the 2 mayors rip off the cable TV subscribers.
What Mark Rumley has done to this city is despicable, from allegations of moonlighting when he shared an office with Paul Donato, to putting his taxpayer funded e mail account on the Immaculate Conception church website.
Rumley's arrogance is matched only by his disregard for civil rights.
Rumley must be retired or fired or both.
More to follow
News media needs to print this letter
Joe Viglione
