1,450,979@8:42 am
1,450,963@8:06 am
1,450,794 @ 12:22 AM
1,450,963@8:06 am
1,450,794 @ 12:22 AM
375 FROM 7 pm - 12:22 am 322 minutes, 375 views
__________________________________WHY DID POLICE CHIEF SACCO HOLD THE PUBLIC TO THE HIGHEST OF STANDARDS, AND OFFICERS LIKE STEPHEN LEBERT TO THE LOWEST OF STANDARDS?
Why We Are Investigating the 27 Police Officers: Rick Muir writes on a 2016 British site - and the link is below if you want the entire article. To summarize it from this writer's point of view: "The police are expected to prevent crime,
to help those in immediate danger, to investigate offences, to catch criminals, to sustain public order and to protect people, particularly vulnerable people, from harm." City Hall allowed Edward P. Finn, then city clerk, to viciously assault a senior citizen - me - three days after a Malden stalker was lurking around my home, allegedly breaking into my home while I was on a business trip in NYC (The Bookexpo.) There were many times that the police did not help me, though the police came to me for help *(the Tony's Gas station robbery; and I helping the cops with the malicious destruction of property at the dental office across from Tony's Gas.) I was harassed, lied to, assaulted, ridiculed, my person and my life violated in the most disgusting of ways. Now we find that almost a quarter of the police force is aghast that the public is required by law to find out who was involved in the alleged "compensation fraud." Despite the excuses of Chief Buckley, Solicitor Rumley, Councilor Dello Russo and Councilor Knight. They claimed "personnel issue" which the Public Records Office disagreed with - showing the law that Rumley and Buckley intentionally failed to follow. The public has an absolute right to know who took an oath of office and who cheated the people they are supposed to serve and protect.
Rick Muir writes 9/23/16:
What do the public expect of the police? At a time of limited resources and shifting demand police forces are being forced to make difficult choices about priorities. Discussing this at this week’s Excellence In Policing conference it struck me that that there is now a considerable gap between what the public expect of the police and the current direction of travel within the service, around which there is a considerable degree of political and professional consensus.
