To camusop@aol.com City Council N Coakley Transcript and 19 More...
Today at 9:58 AM
(guess who the "19 more" are)
Dear City Council:
A
year ago a person, Robert A. Maiocco, found to have multiple complaints
filed against him as a Financial Advisor (FA) at Wells Fargo, was
forced into the presidency of the Medford City Council, putting an
allegedly untrustworthy individual in a position to handle financial
matters on behalf of all citizens, and putting him a heartbeat away from
becoming Mayor. The contentious vote and headlines that followed were
evidence of a selfish man, Maiocco, serving himself rather than being a
"public servant." We cannot allow a tragic mistake like that to
happen two years in a row.
It
was only due to the courage of one citizen that Mr. Maiocco had to
recuse himself from running for office again, no matter what the spin
the Medford Transcript put on it. Maiocco was disgraced and had to
resign. But he could have been Mayor had Mike McGlynn been removed,
incapacitated or indicted.
Maiocco, a first vice president at Wells Fargo investment advisers
was charged in a complaint for 1.8 million dollars and settled for 312,000.00 or so with attorney fees, a whopping $402,000.00. That's more than DOUBLE what Stanley Komins of West Medford Hillside Little League is charged with in Somerville District Court. That Maiocco said of Komins after Komins' arrest "he always did a good job" shows the insensitivity to the citizens that Maiocco had. Also, there were THREE complaints filed against Maiocco in his day job of Financial Adviser. Why was he not upfront and honest with the citizens and his fellow councilors about such an outrageous accusation and monstrously huge settlement?
was charged in a complaint for 1.8 million dollars and settled for 312,000.00 or so with attorney fees, a whopping $402,000.00. That's more than DOUBLE what Stanley Komins of West Medford Hillside Little League is charged with in Somerville District Court. That Maiocco said of Komins after Komins' arrest "he always did a good job" shows the insensitivity to the citizens that Maiocco had. Also, there were THREE complaints filed against Maiocco in his day job of Financial Adviser. Why was he not upfront and honest with the citizens and his fellow councilors about such an outrageous accusation and monstrously huge settlement?
We
cannot let this happen again, which is why Paul A. Camuso needs to be
properly vetted, or the City Council needs to be sued, litigated against
by the citizens, for abuse of power and not looking out for the best
interests of the Medford community.
The
citizens were abused by the Maiocco appointment, and the citizens need
to be PROTECTED from a potentially worse appointment, that of Maiocco's
suspicious nephew, Paul A. Camuso. The thought of Camuso, the
individual with the worst attendance record on the council, being
appointed to a position of great power is tough for residents to
swallow. Voter apathy is no reason for a person of questionable
background to be close to becoming Mayor through the back door, should
health or legal problems ensnare Michael J. McGlynn.
Put
"Robert A. Maiocco wells fargo complaints" into Google and see the
embarrassing information that appears; information that hurts the city
of Medford:
About 2,790 results (0.32 seconds)
Search Results
Robert Alexander Maiocco - Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC Financial ...
financial-advisors.findthebest.com › ... › Financial Advisors
Robert Alexander Maiocco - Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC Financial Advisor. ... civil judicial proceedings, customer complaints, arbitrations, or civil litigations, ...
There
were THREE
COMPLAINTS found on Maiocco, yet he listed only ONE on the disclosure
form on the web. That was not honest of the retired "council president"
- and is a BIG reason why his nephew-by-marriage, Paul A. Camuso, needs
to be PROPERLY VETTED, just as Taxi Cab drivers were vetted by Mr.
Camuso.
What's
good for the goose is good for the gander. Yet, Camuso seeks an office
with power that is one thousand times more tangible than that of a taxi
cab driver, thus, we should have a thousand times the scrutiny, unless
Mr. Camuso wants to dishonestly slip into the
presidency, grab the extra three thousand dollars, citizens be damned.
Mr. Camuso should be vetted as surely as we now vet members of boards and commissions in Medford; with MORE scrutiny than a Taxi Cab driver receives, and the employers, each and every citizen of Medford, need to have that information publicly available on the city website to make a determination if we want to hire someone who might not be fit to be Mayor.
Medford council reappoints leaders in contentious vote ... - Boston.com
www.boston.com/yourtown/news/.../medford_council_re-appoints_le.htmlJan 11, 2013 - Robert Maiocco was reelected as president of the council and Fred Dello ... a state Ethics Commission staff attorney, said anyone nominated for ...Medford council grinds to halt after failing to elect officers - Boston.com
www.boston.com/yourtown/news/.../medford_city_council_fails_to.htmlJan 8, 2013 - Camuso nominated Marks, Maiocco nominated Camuso, and Dello Russo nominated Robert Penta. ... Bob Penta was dubious of Camuso's attempt. ... Since Marks already had sought the opinion of the Ethics Commission's attorney, ... The council moved on to its next item -- voting for a vice president.Medford City Council invokes 'rule of necessity' to re-elect ...
www.wickedlocal.com/.../Medford-City-Council-invokes-rule-of-necessit...Jan 11, 2013 - City Council President Robert A. Maiocco was r-elected as president of the ... “It's the position of the State Ethics Commission that on the rule of ...
The
citizens of Medford are the employers. They have questions that Paul
A. Camuso needs to answer prior to taking a position that would pay him
an additional three thousand dollars. Citizens want to be treated
fairly and not forced to accept an unqualified individual to be a
heartbeat away from the corner office.
Paul A. Camuso is unfit to be president of the Medford City Council.
The
residents deserve better and each councilor that casts a vote for Paul
A. Camuso to be appointed to a position he is unqualified for, will be
held accountable for this travesty.
Some questions for Paul A. Camuso:
On
the same day you plan on taking the presidency, a close friend of yours
is in a pretrial conference, INDICTED BY A GRAND JURY in Woburn
Superior Court for a false bomb threat. Along with Gary Zappelli giving
you unfettered access to the TV station denied many residents, you
engaged in harassment tactics on TV3 Medford aimed at humiliating people
you disagreed with. Your
poor judgment in consorting with an alleged felon, especially given
your position at Sheriff DiPaola and Sheriff Koutoujian's law
enforcement office, is key evidence as to why you should not be
president of the city council What do you have to say in your defense?
On
a post about rock star Madonna on Google, Camuso's good friend actually
makes a public statement prior to his pretrial conference. Does Mr.
Camuso stand by his good, good friend's actions and consider the alleged
threat of bodily harm to be "artistic freedom?"
Gary Zappelli
Sep 19, 2013
On September 4, 2013 I was arrested for expressing my artistic freedom - Justice will be my Freedom.
A GRAND JURY disagreed with Mr. Zappelli, as do the police and the office of the District Attorney. We want to know:
a)what Paul Camuso thinks about his friend's actions
b)Why Camuso protected Gary Zappelli when complaints were lodged by Joanne Codi, John Byers, Pat Fiorello, Joe Viglione and many, many, many others against Paul Camuso's very close, good, good friend.
a)what Paul Camuso thinks about his friend's actions
b)Why Camuso protected Gary Zappelli when complaints were lodged by Joanne Codi, John Byers, Pat Fiorello, Joe Viglione and many, many, many others against Paul Camuso's very close, good, good friend.
Q:
Did you ever pay an
individual at Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. for cable TV time
while knowing that there was censorship, illegal banning of residents
and harassment of members by the board of directors?
Q:
TV3 is a 501c3, prohibited from promoting or attacking candidates for
public office. Yet TV 3 violated this rule with impunity.
Not
only did Mr. Camuso NOT call TV 3 out on its abuse of the rules
governing 501c3's., Camuso ENJOYED the abuse of the rules for his own
personal gain.
Why should Camuso be rewarded with the presidency when the facts show Camuso cannot abide by laws governing the rest of the citizens of Medford?
Re-Elect Medford City Councilor Paul A. Camuso TV:30 ad - YouTube
www.youtube.com/watch?v=_m7572G7drMOct 20, 2009 - Uploaded by CouncilorCamusoMedford City Council Paul A. Camuso's new Campaig
http://www.youtube.com/user/CouncilorCamuso
Q:
Stephanie Muccini Burke and Mark Rumley had information to present to
the council regarding TV3. You, Paul Camuso, thwarted this effort to
protect your friends at TV3, who are now dissolving as they failed to
provide access to the community; failed to abide by their agreement.
Why should citizens accept you as President of the City Council when you
blatantly violated the rights of the people at what is called "the
people's forum." That the Mayor is the
Issuing authority was your excuse, but the real reason was you
did not want your friends at MCC TV3 to be exposed. Now you want Three
Thousand Dollars more and to be in a position to inhibit free speech and
stifle 1st Amendment Rights at "The People's Forum.' How can we
believe you intend to change your behavior now?
Q:
Like your uncle-by-marriage, former president Robert Maiocco, you have
used the bully pulpit to slam your fists, talk above the speakers and
even humiliate residents with lies. This kind of invective is an
embarrassment to
our community, and since you are guilty of it, what credible evidence
is there that this sophomoric behavior will not continue?
This
is just a small portion of the questions I have for Paul Camuso, which
will be asked of him at the City Council, and which he needs to answer
honestly.
Sincerely,
The leader of the opposition
