Water, Sex Change and Fish

154,225



SPARE CHANGE, SEX CHANGE, WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?

Yahoo news has an interesting article on a drought's effect(s) on the fishing industry.
http://news.yahoo.com/video/drought-emergency-could-devastating-effects-214007930.html

An interesting comment on the article is of interest:

WATCHEM  
Stop building new houses. Stop watering golf and play grounds. Stop government stalling building ocean water desalting plants. Get a competent government with officials that tell 'We the People' the truth about conditions and offer practical solutions that don't involve stealing the wealth of the public.

___________________________________________
Humans are a wasteful society.  A future editorial will be on the ridiculous court cases that Judge Mark Wolf is involved in where a murderer wants a sex change operation - paid for by the Commonwealth.  There should be priority tiers of arguments and complaints heard by the courts - and a murderer's illogical request should be pushed to the bottom.

Gender reassignment and search for identity is fine, so long as an individual is not as psychotic as the fictional sex-change character Myra Breckinridge, a brilliant parody of the film industry while using the twisted Myron as its protagonist.  The individual requesting a sex change in the Massachusetts courts is a charlatan - notice the absence of its male or female names; why give him any more publicity.  The use of "it" is because the creature is a convicted murderer with no remorse and refers to his malicious soul, NOT to his abuse of the court system or the use of gender identity to get some front page attention.


ILLOGICAL REQUEST:
Illogical?  Sex change "therapy"  or an operation to change gender is a person's choice, and law-abiding citizens have that right.  For a convicted murderer, who would have, quite possibly, faced the death penalty in another state, it is not life or death.   It is a publicity stunt.

The above referenced drought is just one piece of evidence of vital systems falling apart.    A convicted murderer should have to spend its time toiling to benefit the family members victimized by the hideous act that put the individual behind bars - IF it is clear that the person is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, meaning, beyond the reasonable doubt at trial - if a sincere confession or other evidence corroborates a jury's findings.

Save the fish?  Or let the murderer have a sex change?
Priorities.  A second editorial on this to publish soon.