Thursday, April 18, 2019

Rumley, TV3 - Rumley Must Resign

The thought of Mark Rumley's lies and distractions make me want to vomit.

Sixteen years of that disreputable "city lawyer" sliming people and getting bent out of shape on television, on camera, in a court of law, is sixteen years too long.

The "Consigliere" of Mayor McGlynn is McGlynn's eyes and ears in the criminal enterprise known as Medford City Government.


There is absolutely no difference between the betrayal of Atty General William Barr and Rumley's betrayal, to the Constitution, to the people they are supposed to serve and respect, to life itself.

These are very bad individuals who infect city and national government, and they should be held accountable.


R.I.C.O. is more than an island in the Atlantic ocean.   Why did the city lawyer PROTECT Ed Finn's criminal actions in an e mail that I received.

Why didn't the city lawyer DEFEND a citizen over violent actions by the city clerk, plural, and Edward P. Finn "editing" what citizens would write in their petitions to the council?



After Attorney General William Barr releases his redacted version of the report from special counsel Robert Mueller on Thursday, he should resign. His blatant partisanship disqualifies him from continuing as the chief law enforcement officer of the United States. Neither Congress nor the public will trust that he has been objective and fair in what he has decided to make public of the report, nor will they believe that he can handle any further issues surrounding wrongdoing by President Trump with integrity.

Let us consider the record of Barr in his short time as attorney general in this administration. After two years of constant attacks by Trump on the Justice Department and special counsel for investigating the possible collusion between the campaign and Russian interference in the 2016 election, Barr could have been a breath of fresh air as an attorney general who would firmly stand up for the rule of law. Instead, he just joined in the attacks, calling for yet another investigation into FBI actions during the campaign and releasing a biased summary of the special counsel report.


However, according to Barr, Mueller refused to exonerate Trump on charges of obstructing justice. Barr overruled that determination after only a few short days of examining the two year investigation into the issue and concluded that Trump did not obstruct justice. Barr claimed that the refusal by Mueller to come to a conclusion on the criminal liability for obstruction “left it up to” Barr to reach a conclusion. But that cannot be true. The refusal by Mueller to exonerate Trump was not an invitation for Barr to annul the determination of the special counsel.