_______________________________________________________________
UPON RECEIPT OF A LETTER FROM AN ALLEGED VICTIM THIS MEDIA OUTLET CONTACTED THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION.
____________________________________
THE FBI AGENT SAID THAT SINCE THIS MEDIA OUTLET IS COMFORTABLE DEALING WITH THE D.A.'S OFFICE, TO SEND THE INFORMATION THERE.
_______________________________________ THE POLICE IN THAT CITY PHONED AND WANTED THE LETTER. THEY WERE TOLD THAT BOTH THE FBI AND OFFICE OF THE D.A. WERE CONTACTED.
____________________________________
THIS MEDIA OUTLET JUST WANTS TO DO THE RIGHT THING BY THE PUBLIC.
__________________________________
THIS MEDIA OUTLET CONTACTED ATTORNEYS TO DISCUSS THE INFORMATION AND THE DESIRE TO HAVE THE FBI AND THE D.A. HANDLE IT, NOT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN THAT CITY.
Why?
REMEMBER WHEN ALLEGATIONS OF RACISM WERE DEEP-SIXED AND JUSTICE WAS NOT SERVED by A CERTAIN POLICE DEPARTMENT ???
So the police in that city SHOULD HAVE NO ALLEGIANCE TO THEIR CREEPY MAYOR, EVEN IF A PAL OF THE MAYOR'S PAYPAL ACCOUNT WAS ALLEGEDLY REMOVED PERMANENTLY FOR ...YOU GUESSED IT...
..."USE YOUR IMAGINATION...
IN CASE THEY SAY...'ONGOING INVESTIGATION..."
____________________________________
THE POLICE IN THAT CITY SEEM STIFLED BY AN IGNORANT MAYOR
SO MUCH FOR PROTECTING AND SERVING.
HECK, YOU COULD EVEN GET ASSAULTED BY THE CITY CLERK AND THE CITY SOLICITOR CAN DEFEND THE INDEFENSIBLE...
THERE ARE 46 MAYORS IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS.
_____________________________________
THE ODDS ARE 46 TO 1 THAT YOU CAN FIGURE OUT WHICH MAYOR IS BEING DISCUSSED.
_______________________________________
AN ALLEGED VICTIM SENT THIS MEDIA OUTLET INFORMATION ABOUT A POSSIBLE UGLY SITUATION INVOLVING A FRIEND OF ONE OF THE 46 MAYORS IN MASSACHUSETTS.
_________________________________
AS THIS ALLEGEDLY IS PART OF AN "ONGOING POLICE INVESTIGATION" ALL WE CAN TELL YOU IS THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC PRIOR TO THE POLICE ACCEPTING ALLEGED EVIDENCE.
for that reason other information is not being posted here.
___________________________________
THIS STORY IS UGLY, PEOPLE. AND WHAT IT SHOWS IS THE ICKY WAY THAT BUSINESS IS DONE IN THAT ADMINISTRATION - FROM THE SOLICITOR TO THE CLERK TO SOME OF THE MEMBERS OF THAT CITY'S CITY COUNCIL.
IT IS BEYOND ICKY.
___________________________________ PROBLEM IS, THE ULTRA BAD PERSON CONTINUES TO GET AWAY WITH SUCH MORALLY REPREHENSIBLE CONDUCT BECAUSE HE SEEMS TO HAVE 'PROTECTION' FROM A CREEPY MAYOR. _______________________________________
THE PERSON WHO WROTE THE LETTER SHOULD GO TO THE POLICE AND WRITE AN AFFIDAVIT. DON'T LEAVE ALL THE HEAVY LIFTING TO A MEDIA OUTLET.
___________________________________
THE POLICE IN THE CITY WHERE THIS EVENT ALLEGEDLY OCCURRED SHOULD HAVE THE HELP OF THE PERSON WHO WROTE THE LETTER.
______________________________
AN AFFIDAVIT WILL WORK WONDERS AND JUSTICE CAN BE SERVED.
THIS IS AN ELECTION YEAR.
THE MAYOR, ONE OF 46 IN THE COMMONWEALTH, CERTAINLY DOESN'T WANT HIS PAL ON THE FRONT PAGE OF THE WEEKLY OR ALMOST-DAILY PAPER!
BUT WHAT'S MORE IMPORTANT?
LETTING THE ALLEGED PERP WALK AWAY FROM ANOTHER BAD, BAD SITUATION, OR --- FOR ONCE ---SERVING AND PROTECTING THE PUBLIC?
WHERE ARE THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS IN THE COMMONWEALTH WHEN IN ONE CITY A CLERK CAN ASSAULT A MAN AND A CITY SOLICITOR WILL DEFEND SUCH VULGAR, OBNOXIOUS BEHAVIOR?
WHERE ARE THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS WHEN PAYPAL ALLEGEDLY TAKES A MORE PROACTIVE AND RESPONSIBLE STANCE THAN THE AUTHORITIES?
IF THE INFORMATION IS TRUE, WHICH IT VERY WELL COULD BE.
