Arvey Hellberg pulled his usual stunt in front of a judge last Monday, on Halloween of all days, saying his trademark "What? What? What?" as he has done at the city council.
Problem for Mr. Hellberg is that he's pulled the same stunt on tape. And this is AFTER his lawyer tried telling another judge that his victim was up to something not being home to be served papers that the victim didn't even know were pending!!!!
The judge agreed with the victim when the victim noted certain "flaws" in Hellberg and his attorney's new lies to the court.
___________________________________
Hellberg lost, as usual, in his retaliation strike.
Hellberg is the aggressor - the individual who hurls hate and who deprived our city of something that we pay for; Hellberg using both the community pool and the court system for his own personal gain. And failing.
Again
______________________________________
So Hellberg goes on tv soliciting customers for his FOR PROFIT corporation(s) (and getting called out on it when his partner-in-crime Don Relucia gets yelled at by the Medford City Council for promoting for profit business on a non-profit entity) ...so Hellberg - with his history of failed businesses but promoting himself as some sort of expert, has a long record and pattern of failing to succeed:
El Creepos
Unfair Freight Technology
Savant Technocronies
and, of course, Hellberg/Fraudberg LLC
he's almost five for five in a request to dissolve corporation #5
Bernie Madoff is seething with envy.
What's with the use of the word "technology" in the failed corporations? Sounds good, doesn't it?
But the problem is: that individual lied to the city council, repeatedly. Was called "SICK" by the City Council.
Cherry picks things without giving the full, ugly story about Hellberg's wrongful conduct...
and then, we believe, lied in court papers and in words to a couple of judges.
"What? What?" At the City Council of Medford, on DVD, you can see Hellberg responding to safe questions, and feigning he can't hear (with a hearing aid on) when he doesn't want to answer pertinent questions about how many board members there are, or other damaging things the city council asked.
Then they start their smear campaign saying that the city council has no power over them.
The fact that the 501c3 in question co-owned property with the city and that the city council handles financial affairs of the city proves them wrong.
We had the agreement pulled from them by utilizing the city council as "the people's forum."
And that is why the council attempted to shut down our free speech that we pay for too, courtesy of ignorant and brazen Madame Knight.
This story is far from over. Lots more dirt to come out and we are looking into the new tips and leads that will absolutely shock you about that sick bunch of frauds.
___________________________
3:42 pm
Pageviews today
443
|
Pageviews yesterday
|
486
|
Pageviews last month
|
20,755
|
Pageviews all time history
|
853,503
|
