Thank you, Ms. Scanlon.
I am not happy. I may file an appeal. Let me consider your correspondence and read through it thoroughly.
1)The CORI waiver is to mail in discs, not to show up at the station.
Mr. Rumley said it is "in flux" last year - and when he said "in flux" it was a sick joke aimed at me as I has just
used the term. How unbecoming of a city lawyer to harass councilor Marks or Joe Viglione when Rumley makes
his empty, grandiose speeches. Rumley is SO artificial.
Where's the CORI waive and where are the DOORS TO CITY HALL, and the Secretary of State's office won't
have to deal with Mark Rumley subterfuge any more on these topics.
Back to
1)CORI WAIVER
The first one created by Michelangelo Marcus Rumley the First
made innocent access producers to look like child molesters. It was disgusting.
2)Quite simply put, we just would like to know where the city hall doors are, why the benches we see in Room 201 and 207
and at the high school and in the front of City Hall - the lobby - why these remnants of those expensive benches are all
that the public - which pays for such furnishings - can find.
I will scrutinize your response and send back more commentary and a possible appeal.
My work is of GREAT public interest and citizens are taking notice. My wish is that they would
My work is of GREAT public interest and citizens are taking notice. My wish is that they would
start getting proactive as the past two administrations have taken advantage of residents who don't
have a clue about the corruption (notice I'm not using the word alleged in noting corruption) the corruption
rampant in the Burke administration, as surely as Mike McGlynn's hands - like Rumley's - are in dire need
of cleansing. Where oh where did that Varsity coach go June 30, 2015, Mark's looking for CORI checks on
innocent people when teachers like M.S., D.G and the convicted Jenna Tarabelsi HAD CORI checks
and city hall didn't do a damn thing to protect the children. So we have ripped away the Emperor's New Clothes
and rather than apologize and make amends Mr. Rumley uses his eyes like darts and daggers. How immature.
... and why did an elected official pretty much fondle another elected official in front of two little kids and a 15 year old student running camera
if a CORI check is so important for the public?
Exhibit 1 - photo with Mayor smiling at sex act in front of kids. 10-15-17
Exhibit 2 Rumley's fractured oath of office
So when Mr. Rumley screams from the rafters he wants a CORI check on volunteers when he shared an office with
the perpetrator in the photo, Mr. Donato, but doesn't reprimand Paul Donato, we see the lack of a
CORI WAIVER is just to censor citizens paying Rumley's bloated salary. It allegedly is a violation of his oath of office.
I'll get redundant here as I've put 16 years of my life into investigating Rumley and his wrongful conduct.
I absolutely disagree with Mr. Rumley's skewed look at CORI checking volunteers at an access TV station.
Hiring a station manager requires the manager to supervise. All access TV stations know this.
This is about chilling speech, squelching free speech, a dishonest administration terrified of the public
getting on access TV and asking questions about a sex crime allegedly swept under the rug in 2015.
So why won't Rumley write up a mail-in opportunity, a CORI WAIVER?
Because it has nothing to do with a CORI CHECK and everything to do with illegally spying on citizens running for elected office so
that Mrs. Burke can do her little stomp and smear campaign on people not in her camp.
We know that Mr. Rumley and Mayors Burke and McGlynn are terrified of free speech, so they put on
this dishonest dog and pony show.
The CORI Waiver is to MAIL IN THE DISCS - but Mr. Rumley does everything he can to stop media in the
city of Medford. Maybe he doesn't want it cablecast that he misused and abused the taxpayer funded e mail,
or rather than be at his city hall office that he spent time in Somerville District Court when I mopped the floor up with two lawyers
(three if you add Mark, I had him thrown off the witness stand with a simple objection) or maybe
Mark Rumley is too busy allegedly hiding benches and manhole covers and Medford Housing Authority copper and
curbstones and city hall doors which walk away mysteriously as if they are part of a
Medford version of Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry
I don't think Mr. Rumley has my years of experience in access TV, he's the only city lawyer I know of intentionally
stomping on First Amendment rights which, I believe, is a violation of his oath of office to be "impartial" (the word
isn't in his vocabulary) and uphold the Constitution. I started in access in 1979...anyone in Medford go back that
far? I didn't think so.
The fact that Rumley told me the CORI waiver was being revised. A waiver which is so that people can mail their programs in
without being subjected to potential harassment by Arthur Alan Deluca, Steve Bertorelli, Lenny Scoletta -
all who have bothered me and others over the years (Deluca even censored Rep Donato, go figure) ...
I believe Rumley only added "possibility" of being around children after this public access producer made it clear that the law
is unsupervised contact. Which, ostensibly, is why you pay a station manager the big dollars.
And look at the dregs of society at the high school - Art Deluca who censored Donato and was
investigated by Elder Affairs for abusing his mother allegedly with vulgar words and yelling and screaming, as witnessed by
a colleague via telephone;
Then there's XXXX. who allegedly used TV 3 equipment to dub tape recordings - some of which he allegedly did not own and allegedly sold
them to the public without owning the copyright, in alleged violation of RIAA rules - which could have serious consequences for the city of Medford
if XXX. is down to his alleged old tricks, and Mr. Bertorelli ...bad attitude, poorly dressed, and the high school kids are still exposed to the bad element that I removed when my hard work and honest efforts forced McGlynn to throw those individuals out in 2013. Six years later they are back like poltergeist, good scarecrows there to keep honest citizens away. If they messed up so badly the first time, why are they back? Oh, that's right, Rumley was a fellow board member with one or two of them back in the day. Rumley's perpetual conflict of interest, hypocrisy and bad attitude are not in his oath of office.
But when did Mark Rumley ever care about an oath and swearing to it and adhering to it.
This is just getting the facts on public record.
Working on how to appeal these issues in a specific fashion to get City Hall to be honest with the ratepayers and taxpayers who get
taken advantage of year after year.
I'm the good guy. But we know that you know that.
Let's see if any aspect of your response makes another appeal necessary.
A logical city hall would just tell me what I want to know. A deceitful city hall is not forthright.
Medford is never forthright with the citizens.
Respectfully,
Respectfully,
Joe Viglione
On Tuesday, July 9, 2019, 04:35:34 PM EDT, Kim Scanlon <k > wrote:
Dear Mr. Viglione:
Attached please find my supplemental response to your records request.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
Kimberly M. Scanlon
Assistant City Solicitor
Records Access Officer
