1,424,390 @ 5:28 pm
1,424,377@5:06 pm
1,424,354 @ 3:51 pm
1,424,328 @ 3:01 pm
698 hits @ 5:28 pm since 8 pm Oct 24, 2019
Office of the Middlesex District Attorney
15 Commonwealth Avenue
Woburn, MA 01801
Main Phone: (781) 897-830
To: D.A. Marian Ryan,
Last night at 9:39 pm I received a voice mail from a stalker. The stalker has harassed me for the better part of a year.
Here is the content of that threat:
9:39 pm "Joey...I
heard there's a bounty on your head...the first cop that grabs ya...he's
looking for ya buddddddyyyyyyyyyyyy" followed by feigned laughter.
This
is an intimidation tactic as on Thursday, October 24, 2019 the
Secretary of State's office made a determination to compel Medford City
Hall to provide the documents concerning the 26 or 27 police officers
disciplined for alleged "police misconduct," as noted on the weekly
Medford Transcript. My public records request was filed on or about
September 26, 2019.
Now if the police have already been disciplined, a second investigation by your office would be for a separate matter entirely.
a)City
Hall never provided information that they wanted any "investigatory
exemption" - and there's a good reason that they did not include that in
their response, and failed to add that during the time allowed after
both parties received an e mail requesting additional information on
October 10th. I supplied additional information, Medford city hall's
law office did not.
b)All I've
asked for is the document containing the names of the officers who have
already been disciplined. If the police department has disciplined
them, the public has a great interest in who these officers are. It's a
done deal, disciplined and - according to Medford's solicitor, Mark E.
Rumley, the fines or monies have been paid. See attachment. Page 2 of
Mark E. Rumley's letter to Supervisor of Records Lori Sullivan dated
October 24, 2019 - final paragraph "The discipline imposed..."
Since
the discipline has already been imposed, and your alleged investigation
is separate, the public's great interest in something Rumley admits has
already been determined carries great weight. The public's right to
know should NOT be impeded by one or five or one hundred additional
investigations. It is absurd and is typical of Mark Rumley's
boy-who-cried-wolf tactics.
Rumley's
boy-who-cried-wolf activities beyond this case include Rumley
investigating his own board of directors at Medford Community
Cablevision, Inc. Rather than explain to the public the math that was
published in the weekly Medford Transcript, Rumley - purportedly seeing
his credibility shredded having been on the board of directors that
failed to account to the public how public money was spent, or not
spent, threw the hot potato to the AG's Non-Profit Organizations/Public Charities Division which has approximately 23,000 charities to oversee. Easy to get lost in that shuffle.
I
believe Mr. Rumley ascertained that his investigation included aspects
of the MCC TV3 case that the AG's office was not involved in.
Hard
to follow Mr. Rumley's intentional lack of clarity. As you know, Ms.
Ryan, there's no transparency in the Muccini-Burke administration, and
Rumley - dating back to the lengthy McGlynn era, is just more subterfuge
and distraction.
I submit that the threat I received is because - clearly - this investigative reporter has struck a nerve.
I
submit that the conflicts of Mark E. Rumley are so obvious that he is
using your office as yet another boy-who-cried-wolf distraction.
Rumley
doesn't care about the public's safety and certainly not the public's
right to know. Rumley just follows his marching orders at a critical
phase of an election, when Rep Paul Donato has declared publicly that
this is "The most protected right."
So
the "protected right" Rep Donato yells from the rooftops about (Donato
was indignant that a TV program featuring Mayor Burke when she was a
city councilor, was censored. Donato met with me to put my innocent and
informative show on the air, but didn't do any follow-through.) You
see, it's all about the needs of a Rumley or a Donato - not about the
citizens they are supposed to serve, the citizens who pay them
handsomely.
________________________________________________________________________________________
So - what will your office do about a reporter being threatened?
Let's look at our past history, Ms. Ryan
Some background:
Gerry Leone set up a meeting for me with Doug Nagengast prior to Mr. Leone leaving the D.A.'s office.
Your
office refused to investigate Medford Community Cablevision, Inc., a
501c3 non-profit that Medford City Solicitor Mark Rumley was appointed
to the board of. I have written many public records requests to the
office of the Attorney General's public charities division to obtain
information of great public interest: what happened to the cable TV
ratepayer funds.
During
election 2015 I was harassed by a different stalker, a Julie T. Kelleher
on or about June 12 and 13, 2015. I obtained a one year
Harassment Protection Order against Ms. Kelleher.
When
I asked ex Medford Police Chief Sacco on October 17, 2017 why he didn't
help me with Kelleher's stalking activities Mr. Sacco, indignant that I
spoke to the city council (and citizens viewing) about the Channel 5
report on Sacco's MBTA cop son pulled over for alleged drunk driving and
getting no field sobriety test or breathalyzer - Mr. Sacco threatened
me with "the police service you deserve."
On
or about June 16, 2015 I was violently attacked, physically and
verbally, by city clerk Edward P. Finn. Now either I'm the unluckiest
guy in the world, or being stalked on June 12 and 13, attacked on June
16th and being social media person for Mayor Burke's opponent in the
2015 election made me a target. You're the D.A. You can do the easy
math on that one.
On or
about December 1 0r 3, 2015 I received word that the mayor's husband,
vulgar Brian Burke, clerk of courts, who used profanity on me at the
Chevalier Theater when I was making a back-up tape of the debate, was
not going to be reprimanded for violating the canon of ethics. Honesty
in government?
On or about
December 3, 2015 I filed a records request on a teacher having sex with a
powerful politician's daughter; I believe that powerful politician is a
good friend of yours. In fact, I believe I saw you and Michael
Sullivan at Alden Chambers for some ceremony around that time.
On
or about December 8th 2015 the Medford police under Detective Mackowski
and Paul Covino decided to retaliate against me for filing the public
records request. The case against Finn that I dropped they now
resurrected (????) They made a false claim that I intimidated a
witness. It cost me thousands of dollars but I defeated your office and
the police for this retaliation and revenge tactic.
Shame on you and them.
I
defeated your office and the Medford police, lo and behold, the same
month that ex-Chief Sacco's son was pulled over for alleged drunk
driving. We file that under: Karma.
On September 1, 2016 I obtained an additional 3 years of protection against Ms. Kelleher via a determination by Judge Yee
a)Judge
Yee removed Mark E. Rumley from the witness stand for "irrelevant"
testimony. Mr. Rumley had no knowledge pertinent to the case. Rumley
was up there throwing proverbial rocks at me. How unprofessional.
b)Rumley
then congregated with Harvey Alberg and Arthur Deluca, the cronies on
his board of directors that Rumley was supposed to be investigating.
Why didn't Rumley just leave and go back to work with taxpayers funding
him? That's a good question
c)Frank
Pilleri, self-appointed president of MCC TV3 (he used names of ex board
members claiming he had a current board to make himself president,
allegedly) stomped on my foot in the courtroom. Violence against a
reporter again.
So, District Attorney Ryan.
Rather than help me with TV3, your office harassed me, attempted to
humiliate me with a disgusting press release from your office in the
Medford Transcript. Your ADA Raquel Frisadi was relentless in her
attacks, taking information out of context because she had no case, and
why am I writing to you when your office - clearly - is an accomplice to
city hall in wrongful conduct against citizens?
I'm writing to get this on the public record.
Mr.
Rumley's "reconsideration" letter cites you, a woman who had it in for
me, as a reason why the public should be denied documents that Rumley
admits concern matters that have already been concluded in regards to
discipline. Since those matters have been concluded, the public has a
right to know the names of the officers involved. Hundreds of
"investigations" can start up on this matter, just look at the lunacy
from AG Barr in regards to investigating investigators.
So
your office could open up a number of phony investigations for Mr.
Rumley, just like he threw his investigation of TV3 over to the AG's
office to stop the public from getting information that the public has
great interest in.
I've been threatened. Your office, rather than help a victim, filed false charges on a victim of a violent crime.
Maybe
you hate elders, Ms. Ryan, as I am 65. Maybe you hate homosexuals, or
maybe, the most likely scenario, you'd rather waste taxpayer monies not
doing your job but harassing innocent people just for fun.
I was threatened last night. What charge are you going to file on the victim this time? Retaining a threat on his cellphone?
Good one.
The Medford Police don't like my investigation. I've been threatened. Do the math.
Check the phone calls coming from police officer phones for me.
Thank you.
3:51 pm
Pageviews today
|
662
|
Pageviews yesterday
|
531
|
Pageviews last month
|
19,756
|
Pageviews all time history
|
1,424,354
|
