Sunday, March 15, 2020

Improving Medford - Part 1 - Michael Marks - and What Term Limits Could Do for the City of Medford

1,572,472 @ 11:30 pm 
1,572,217@9:09 pm
1,572,150 @ 6:37 pm 
1,572,098@5:40 pm
1,572,040 @ 4:13 pm
1,571,979 @ 2:03 pm all-time page views
31,921 for the month
499 from 8 pm to 4:13 pm 3-15-2020

If Medford had term limits Breanna's City Council would possibly consist of 



Isaac Bears at 5209 votes, Nicole Morell @ 4836
Jean M. Nuzzo at 4486, Natalie Breen at 4559  Erin DiBenedetto at 4551, Anne Marie Cugno at 3698 and Steven Collicelli, @3679  depending - of course - where all the votes would go for the candidates currently bound by no term limits and only the prospect of "term limits"

PREFACE: Jean Nuzzo, Erin DiBenedetto and Natalie Breen could bring some new life to this council ...and this city.... I am working on bringing the evidence of the March 10, 2020 city council misconduct to the proper authorities in faith that we can remove some of the bad element and replace them with these honorable women.

The first new mayor in 32 years after the McGlynn/Muccini-Burke reign and within 2 months the coronavirus hits - a major crisis.

I submit that the city council was not prepared for this crisis and that Medford would be better prepared with five other first-timers on the council - as noted above - even though Mrs. Cugno is not my first choice.  There would be enough votes to counteract Cugno.

This long-time journalist has studied Medford politics more than most and if you ignore my warnings based on fact you do so at the peril of this city and any safety nets you think you may have.

Consider this: Mayor Breanna Lungo-Koehn with DiBenedetto, Nuzzo and Breen on the council, could really change the city for the better.

Breanna is stuck with the Muccini-Burke leftovers - Caraviello, Knight, Falco, Scarpelli - these individuals are lock-step with the last regime and are a hindrance to any progress the city of Medford hopes to make.
______________________________________________________
HOW DO WE PULL MEDFORD OUT OF THE RUT?

Term Limits and intelligent people volunteering to be on the city council; putting the 200k a year into the city coffers.

This is Part 1 in a look at each and every city councilor and whether their pluses outweigh their minuses
______________________________________________________
STUDY #1  Michael Marks and his Facts Deficiency
__________________________________________

The waffling Medford city councilor Michael Marks told ex solicitor Rumley "I'm very confused."  Rumley shot back "Very confused is an apt description."  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdIBJlksJJA

Were it true that Mr. Marks was merely confused! - were it only true.   

As entertaining as it is watching two dishonest government officials making spectacle at the council, how does this help Medford?

I've watched the video repeatedly laughing at, not with, these clowns passing themselves off as generous and community-motivated, community-oriented men.  

They are nothing of the sort.  

Understand that, citizen, because your family is at risk with such jokers playing fast and loose with the truth...and with your money.

Rumley wore 5 hats with his solicitor sleight-of-hand while Marks likes to prattle incessantly - my original term for him at the council was "the circus barker" when he was aligned with Dello Russo and Camuso back in the day.  Marks changes his position the way Myra Breckinridge changed her underwear, a guy's briefs one day, a woman's lingerie the next, back to being Myron, the guy.  If Marks thinks he's "very confused," how about his worried constituents?   Marks position-switching is the envy of that other gagoots, on the fence zucchini brain Caraviello.

Sadly, Medford, the fact deficient councilor - puts on good display for such a bad actor, so how does that help you and your family?

Me saying what you are only thinking makes me, the good guy, also - THE ENEMY.  They attack me with lies, I get them with the truth.

And they can't stand it.  And "they" is an all encompassing word in this regard.

This IS about the greater good.  This IS about the city of Medford, ill-prepared for the Corona virus - especially when it comes to the government-controlled media in Medford.

Like the majority of Medford politicians - that majority being 100%, it is all about their pocketbook, their enormous egos and a total lack of sensitivity when it comes to paving a solid, prosperous future for our city.   The citizens get it about scam artist Richard F. Caraviello, there's not an honest bone in that individual's body. But Marks puts himself out there as some kind of champion for the working class and based on the data that I've acquired, Mr. Marks - when put under the microscope - Mr. Marks says the right things, but his actions are in direct conflict with his words.   

After we go through the first cycle Marks, Caraviello, Scarpelli, Falco, Knight, Bears and Morell, we will circle back with a Part II on Michael Marks.


DEFINITIONS
Deficiency
NOUN
a lack or shortage.
Fact
NOUN
a thing that is known or proved to be true.

Joe Viglione  

6:37 pm 3-15-2020
Pageviews today
609
Pageviews yesterday
655
Pageviews last month
32,092
Pageviews all time history
1,572,150
4:13 pm 3-15-2020
Pageviews today
499
Pageviews yesterday
655
Pageviews last month
31,982
Pageviews all time history
1,572,040