Did Julie the Jarhead VIOLATE the Restraining Order via THIRD PARTY HARASSMENT?

731,161 @ 12:39 pm

Victim upset by Julie "The Jarhead" Kelleher's constant rants on Medford Transcript with a third-party, possibly her accomplice, referencing a "Joe."   It has to stop.

It is upsetting to me, and it is intentional.  Why isn't Kelleher obsessing over Chelsea or Everett or Revere?   Simply because her victim doesn't read those papers and she is looking to keep her presence visible where it will be upsetting to him. Then an alleged accomplice references her victim by name.

Think about it.  Pure third-party harassment.

RESPECTED MEDFORD RESIDENT C.R. PUTS JULIE THE JARHEAD FROM MALDEN IN HER PLACE WHEN JARHEAD VICTIMIZES BOB P.

@Julie the Jarhead, also...he was a city councilor for greater than 20 years, so that would be the title to go with. And, he lost the mayoral race by 550 votes, so MANY people wanted to see him in the mayor's office.

Whether you like Bob or not, this development is too large and will sharply increase housing costs in Medford as well as further crowd schools and strain our services...
____________________________________


STATEMENT FROM THE VICTIM:

When I returned home from New York in May of 2015 I found a huge package of confidential financial documents opened on my porch.   It was as if someone stole U.S. mail ( a Federal offense) and then threw it on the porch (not with the mailbox where it belongs) with the flap wide open.    This was reported to the authorities and to my accountant and one or two of my lawyers.
__________________________________

This was about 12 days before a stalker was photographed near my home. The stalker, now with an order of harassment prevention on her - against her - was Julie T. Kelleher of Malden.
___________________________________
The same woman that was removed by her "peeps" from a 501c3, her own colleagues, voting her off of a non-profit board for exactly the same reason a judge put a restraining order on her. For harassing a man she doesn't even know.
_________________________________

It is "coincidental" that my mail was opened, that I felt like some sick person was watching me, and that 12 days later someone would be caught lurking around my home, caught on camera.

WHO WAS LOOKING AT MY MAIL?
At that moment I knew a person or persons was looking at my mail and was engaged in stalking.  Materials had been moved around INSIDE my home.  On June 12, 2015, while taking a photo of Republic Parking illegally parked, a stalker emerged snapping a photo directly behind my neck in a frightening and intimidating way.  It turned out to be the unbalanced individual who had been harassing and cyber-bullying me for 17 months after a tragedy.

Was it one person or were there two or three stalkers engaging in this pattern of harassment, just as was revealed on the internet?  Were the same people engaging with the convicted stalker on the internet the same people allegedly looking at my mail?



_____________________________________
Multiple reports to those in authority and the police in both Medford and Malden were filed against Julie T. Kelleher, but the police didn't act, and she escalated her criminal activities.

Julie T. Kelleher is not allowed 100 yards near me. That means she cannot drive down Salem Street, Route 60, where Tony's Gas station is as it is within the 100 yards of where I am.

TV3 Medford has engaged in the Kelleher styled tactics for years against a variety of citizens. 

This is the place where we live, work and engage in social affairs.  It must be safe.

I am now looking at my legal options with the further incident this morning.

An ADA with District Attorney Marian Ryan's office has a copy of the harassment protection order against Ms. Kelleher.   Enough is enough. Kelleher posts on the Transcript (she lives in Malden, why her fixation on the city where her victim lives???   She is trying to get under his skin and into his head.  It is sick.  And then "Oscar" - either her alias or one of her associates - attacks Kelleher's victim on the Transcript.    

This is frightening.
 _______________________________
Disgusting harassment of an innocent man.

On September 1, 2015, a restraining order for her criminal activities was placed on Julie the Jarhead, the handle of Julie T. Kelleher of Malden.

Kelleher was aligned and may still be aligned with the allegedly criminal gang at TV3 which still refuses to show the books.

Chief harasser at TV3 is Arthur Alan Deluca, an individual who repeatedly lied to the police about Matthew Page Lieberman telling a woman to commit suicide and other choice bits Deluca would send to the cops.

According to the victim, who corresponded with this writer, Matthew Page Lieberman harassed a minority woman who allegedly wouldn't have sex with him. He told her to put an exhaust pipe in a car and kill herself. That's Adam Knight's friend.
The victim was very clear that it was Matthew Page Lieberman that hit on her.

Arthur Alan Deluca lied to the police, ostensibly to protect TV3.

We only know this through a public records request received on January 6, 2014 from City Hall which had Deluca's lies to the police.

To this date Deluca has not been charged, but the statute of limitations is alive and we are going to be asking for Deluca to be charged with and for his alleged crimes.

A month or so later Deluca and the two Alberg frauds (find them in bankruptcy court if you can't find their residences of the fraudulent "625 High Street" along with 626 High Street, 75 Station Landing and two Malden addresses...) seemed to have recruited Kelleher to help them do their decades long dirty work campaign.

Well, Kelleher was immediately bounced out of a 501c3 in Malden for her ugly, vicious harassment, and then she increased her violent attacks on a man she told a judge she didn't even know.

It was like watching Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction when she said "He gives his address on TV" when she told the judge why she stalked him at his residence.

Sick and vile.

And now Kelleher has her cronies besmirching her victim, pure third-party harassment on a victim while Kelleher can't control herself.  Her own postings in her own writings seem to violate the restraining order via Kelleher's obsessive scribblings on the Medford Transcript site.

She doesn't even live in Medford, and her nonsense about how much she loves Medford didn't hold up in a court of law.

Why doesn't she pick on Chelsea or Everett or Melrose?  Because her victim does not live in those cities.

One would think since she cannot even drive on portions of Route 60 without violating the restraining order she would knock it off and just stay away.  But she cannot.  

This information will be brought into a court of law.

It is frightening, it is sick, it is upsetting.