over 19,000 views since we hit 1.5 million visits! Wow!
THE VIGLIONE REPORT DETERMINES:
A)THE ALLEGEDLY FRAUDULENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS CONTAINED UNQUALIFIED INDIVIDUALS -
ART DELUCA, RON DELUCIA,
HARVEY ALBERG,
FRANCIS R. PILLERI, JR. WHO WERE NOT WELL VERSED IN ACCESS TELEVISION, HAD LITTLE OR NO EXPERIENCE, AND WHO USED THE TV STATION FOR THEIR OWN PERSONAL PLEASURE OR -IN THE CASE OF ALBERG AND DELUCIA, FOR INFOMERCIALS FOR THEIR BUSINESSES, ALBERG FINANCIAL AND ARK INSURANCE RESPECTIVELY.
b)FURTHERMORE, ALBERG OF TV3 - WHO WENT UP TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO SLANDER AN AWARD-WINNING PUBLIC ACCESS PRODUCER THAT ALBERG IS JEALOUS OF, HARASSES AND DEFAMES THE INVESTIGATOR ON HIS OWN WEBSITE, WHICH IS STUPID.
ANY LOGICAL PERSON SEEING MEAN-SPIRITED LIBEL POSTED TO SMEAR AN INDIVIDUAL INVESTIGATING THE tv station OPERATED BY AN ALLEGED MONEY MANAGER WHO FILED FOR BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION (now there's the sign of a not very successful money manager) - DOES SO AT THEIR OWN PERIL. WE WON'T STAND IN YOUR WAY, WE JUST TELL YOU TO DO A THOROUGH BACKGROUND CHECK BY LOOKING AT THE BANKRUPTCY COURT AND LOOKING AT ANY AND ALL CORPORATIONS FOUNDED BY THE INDIVIDUAL WHO WANTS TO 'MANAGE' YOUR MONEY. THAT'S ALL.
LET THE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.
_____________________________
C)TYPICAL OF TV3, ALBERG SOUGHT A SCAPEGOAT FOR HIS ALLEGED FINANCIAL TROUBLES, AND POSTS ON HIS WEBSITE THAT HIS FAILURE IS DUE TO A MAN INVESTIGATING THE PUBLIC ACCESS STATION.
WELL, LET'S DO A QUICK COMPUTATION.
A)if alleged money manager lost corporation after corporation
B)if alleged money manager promoted his business on Public Access as a sort of quasi infomercial or not even a quasi infomercial, just a plain, ordinary infomercial with a phone number for you to call for "information" (in reality, a call for action in violation of the rules governing access tv, allegedly) do you want your monies "managed" with such fast and loose, grey area practices?
C)if a braggart who pompously went up to the city council to defame people so that he could continue to abuse the access airwaves and DENY cable TV subscribers and the general public their right to be on the air was that selfish, how do you think your money will be "managed" if he can't even - allegedly - manage his own life?
THAT KIND OF ALLEGED DECEPTION IS WRONG.
IF YOU WANT TO USE MORALLY BANKRUPT HARVEY ALBERG FOR YOUR FINANCIAL FUTURE WITHOUT KNOWING THE REAL FACTS, WITHOUT SEEING HIM MAKE A JACKASS OF HIMSELF AT THE CITY COUNCIL OF MEDFORD, WE WON'T STAND IN YOUR WAY. YOU WOULD DESERVE IT!
________________________________
This is of GREAT public interest and these public documents have already been paid for by the taxpayers and the cable TV subscribers via the franchise fee. The public has paid double - in P/E/G access franchise fees and tax dollars. You have no right denying them and keeping them from the public that was thoroughly cheated by Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. and the administrations of former mayors Michael J. McGlynn and Stephanie Muccini-Burke.
FROM A PORTION OF MY LETTER
I submit that with the statute of limitations and the AG's office's failure to give these public records in a timely manner, it is quite possible that it is the office of the Attorney General that is impeding law enforcement. That is said respectfully.
The new mayor of Medford is in the cc: above.
I began hosting public access television in 1979. It is my opinion, based on information, belief and experience, that your office has taken too much time and that the citizens of Medford have been harmed by the office of the Attorney General as much as they have been harmed by the wrongful conduct of the suspicious board of directors of Medford Community Cablevision, Inc.
Suspicious as I do not believe the board was properly formed, nor were the malicious individuals who took advantage of the P/E/G access funds duly elected. My investigation led to the former city solicitor, Mark E. Rumley, filing in his "Rumley Report" that bogus names were used to create the board of directors (names of former, not current, board members) to install the allegedly unqualified board members, deceive the public and abuse the funds for private "public" parties, lawsuits and for what retired judge Marie O. Jackson-Thompson called "private...MCC Access."
Suspicious as I do not believe the board was properly formed, nor were the malicious individuals who took advantage of the P/E/G access funds duly elected. My investigation led to the former city solicitor, Mark E. Rumley, filing in his "Rumley Report" that bogus names were used to create the board of directors (names of former, not current, board members) to install the allegedly unqualified board members, deceive the public and abuse the funds for private "public" parties, lawsuits and for what retired judge Marie O. Jackson-Thompson called "private...MCC Access."
A retired judge found that the deceptive board of directors used the funding for their private club, a public access station wrongfully used to make movies, sue access producers to keep them out of the facilities, harass and stalk (all documented by the courts and by the Medford police) - and, basically, when the office of the Attorney General failed to rule quickly and efficiently on what the retired judge surmised could be "malfeasance," (her choice of word), it helped enable MCC TV3's attempt to "get away with it;" enabled by your office's stalling as well as the inaction of the former conflicted city solicitor who was investigating the very board that he was appointed to. Allegedly.
11:29 am
Pageviews today
|
483
|
Pageviews yesterday
|
611
|
Pageviews last month
|
27,126
|
Pageviews all time history
|
1,519,046
|
