THINK ABOUT THIS.
INEFFICIENT OR NEGLIGENT (PROBABLY BOTH) ED FINN COULD NOT FIND THE CONTRACT FROM COMCAST
IT CAME VIA UPS IN A BIG BOX
HOW BIG DOES THE PACKAGE HAVE TO BE FOR FINN TO FIND IT.
HE IS EITHER NEGLIGENT OR SOMETHING MORE NEFARIOUS.
I BELIEVE THAT FINN INTENTIONALLY AND MALICIOUSLY HID THE COMCAST CONTRACT TO KEEP THE CITIZENS WHO PAY HIM FROM KNOWING ABOUT THE CABLE TELEVISION AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
ONE CITIZEN, YOURS TRULY, FOUND THE CONTRACT.
ONE CITIZEN WHO WORKED FOR SUNSHINE ON THE ASCERTAINMENT HEARING, AND WHO VIDEOTAPED IT!
7-8-15
Hello Councilor Penta,
I can't seem to get a straight answer out of Mark Rumley. Is the Comcast contract signed?
Do we have a balloon payment from Comcast and an additional one from Verizon?
Notice the rhetoric from Rumley. It is unfair. We are being cheated by Medford City Hall again in an election cycle
Please see if you can get an answer out of the Mayor-in-hiding, Michael J. McGlynn
Thank you
Joe Viglione
Sent: Friday, July 3, 2015 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: Comcast Agreement Re: Public Records Request
Subject: Re: Comcast Agreement Re: Public Records Request
The law department does not have the signed Comcast Agreement nor does it have any written correspondence from the attorney general regarding missing money pertaining to MCC
Mark Rumley
City Solicitor
Sent from my iPhone
Sent from my iPhone
The Office of Community Development has no records on this matter.
Lauren DiLorenzoKeeper of the records:
Public records request follows editorial note:Editorial note:Paul A. Camuso of the Medford City Council failed to discuss the Mayor's negotiations with Comcast and failed to show up at the Ascertainment hearing. Why did Mr. Camuso put a bogus discussion of public access on the Agenda for June 30, 2015, and why does Mr. Camuso repeatedly lie to the citizens of Medford that he is supposed to serve.
Mr. Camuso was supporting the unethical Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. on Tuesday, June 30th; reprimanding a councilor who shut down the station that promoted a convicted child rapist, that cablecast pornography in Dirty Talk Live; a station that violated 501c3 rules in order to promote Camuso and attack his colleagues on the city council. Camuso has failed to address the two arrests of his best friend at MCC who was arrested for allegedly giving alcohol to a minor on some alleged sleepover in P-Town last year (July 8, 2014) and for allegedly making a false bomb threat (arrested on or about September 4, 2013.) These are the associates of Sheriff Koutoujian's employee, Paul A. Camuso, the political assassin disrupting council meetings to benefit candidate Stephanie Muccini-Burke. Mr. Camuso was visibly angry that the wrongful conduct of TV3 was shut down - and he was angry with the candidate who did the hard work to better our community. Police Lieutenant JJ McLean said to me on or about January 14, 2014 "You won; and the city is better off for it." (paraphrased.)So why is Camuso complaining about TV3 being shut down when a respected police lieutenant was happy with our hard work and honest efforts?Joe ViglioneAgency Head or Keeper of the Records
City of Medford
85 George P. Hassett Drive
Medford, MA 02155
Re: Massachusetts Public Records Request
Dear City Solicitor and/or Budget Director or
Keeper of the Records:
This is a request under the Massachusetts Public Records Law (M. G. L. Chapter 66, Section 10). I am requesting that I be provided a copy of the following records:
---the signed Comcast contract with the signature of the Issuing Authority scheduled for signing on or about July 3, 2015---Correspondence from the office of the Attorney General regarding the missing $33,000.00 that Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. claimed it had a surplus of with ZERO balance left in the account.The City Solicitor promised this city that he would hold MCC TV3 accountable by on or about July 24, 2014. We've seen the failed leadership of Issuing Authority Michael J. McGlynn and how he gives special treatment to the reprobates on the board of directors of Medford Community Cablevision, Inc.Public records and are the property of the citizens of Medford. The City Solicitor is supposed to protect the city of Medford, not the bad behavior of some very, very bad people who destroyed a free speech platform.
I recognize that you may charge reasonable costs for copies, as well as for personnel time needed to comply with this request. If you expect costs to exceed $10.00, please provide a detailed fee estimate.
I would be happy to inspect the documents at Medford City Hall to keep the costs down. I will be photographing the documents if City Hall intends to charge a fee for them.
The Public Records Law requires you to provide me with a written response within 10 calendar days. If you cannot comply with my request, you are statutorily required to provide an explanation in writing.
Sincerely,
Joe Viglione