7 hits away from 358,000 page views!!!
__________________________________
MCGLYNN'S RELATIONSHIP WITH ZAPPELLI AND TV3 IS GOING TO NICELY SEGUE TO BURKE'S RELATIONSHIP WITH MCLGYNN.
FASTEN YOUR SAFETY BELTS AS THE STORY UNFOLDS!
*note
We are going to ask - in a public records request - when Stephanie Burke was on the MVDC board that she brags about in her campaign literature.
EVEN if Burke wasn't on the board when the lawsuit happened, she participated on a board with a very suspicious history.
Was BURKE on the Board of MVDC AND on the City Council when Council President Maiocco flipped out at the City Council because the MVDC did not alert the Medford City Council, as it was required to?
Medford councilor accuses Malden official of hiding lawsuit
Posted by Travis Andersen September 25, 2009 11:00 AMMedford City Councilor Robert Maiocco says Stephen Wishoski, head of the Malden Redevelopment Authority, concealed a pending lawsuit against the commission overseeing the River's Edge development, when Wishoski asked the Council for a $1 million loan to help fund the project in April 2008.
"You were obligated to notify the Medford City Council [of any lawsuits] and you didn't," Maiocco told Wishoski at a Medford City Council meeting earlier this week. Wishoski denied the accusation.
http://www.boston.com/yourtown/news/medford/2009/09/medford_councilor_accuses_mald.html
IF Darth Stephanie held back, was not forthright with the information to her fellow councilors, it means she wasn't forthright with the PEOPLE, hiding the MVDC truth from the people of Medford.
If so, how can you EVER trust Stephanie Muccini-Burke?
Was Gary Zappelli right about her? Did Zappelli know something? Why was he so vicious in attacking Stephanie Burke*
*Zappelli is a mean-spirited, vindictive, nasty individual who makes it VERY personal; that's a given, BUT, Zappelli has a bizarre friendship with Michael J. McGlynn that is under investigation as you read this; it could come back to bite both McGlynn and Burke.
___________________________________
E. Count Ten: Violation of the Massachusetts Public Records Act
If so, shame on her, and another situation that, if on public access TV, would be problematic for the woman known as Darth Stephanie, the Mayor's handmaiden.
Guess who Stephanie Burke served with on the ugly MVDC - Mystic Valley Development Commission?
That's right, Mayor Michael J. McGlynn.
E. Count Ten: Violation of the Massachusetts Public Records Act
EIC DEVELOPMENT, LLC, et al.
v.
THE MYSTIC VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMMISION, et al.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
SUPERIOR COURT
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 01-4535
EIC DEVELOPMENT, LLC and ESSEX CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.,
Plaintiffsvs .
THE MYSTIC VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMMISION, THE CITY OF EVERETT, DAVID RAGUCCI, PETER HOLLANDS, ELIZABETH DEBSKI, and STEPHEN M. WISHOSKI,
Defendants
http://masslawyersweekly.com/fulltext-opinions/1990/01/01/eic-development-llc-et-al-v-the-mystic-valley-development-commision-et-al/
The City Council - Maiocco - brought it to a head at the council, while Stephanie was allegedly ON the Council.
Where was Stephanie on Mystic Valley Development Commission with her council brothers and sister.
____________________________________
On Public Records Request
Four Million Dollars Went South thanks to the UGLY practices of the MVDC
Informed voters now know why McGlynn and Burke have swiped public access TV away from you...their sins are many, and they don't want you to know this:
LAWSUIT AGAINST MVDC
E. Count Ten: Violation of the Massachusetts Public Records Act
In its Second Amended Complaint, EIC alleges that the MVDC and the City of Everett violated the Massachusetts Public Records Act, G.L. c. 66, § 10(b), by failing timely to provide the public records it requested in a letter dated August 28, 2001 from its prior attorney. After the Second Amended Complaint was filed, both the MVDC and the City of Everett responded in writing to this public records request and both now contend that this claim has been rendered moot by these responses. EIC contends that its claim is not moot both because the disclosure has been incomplete and because the copying amount charged by the MVDC and the City is above the“reasonable fee” permitted under G.L. c. 66, § 10(a) of the Public Records Act. Since there appear to be factual issues still in dispute as to this claim (albeit issues peripheral to those that go to the merits of this lawsuit), the motion brought by the MVDC and the City of Everett to dismiss Count Ten must be DENIED.
http://masslawyersweekly.com/fulltext-opinions/1990/01/01/eic-development-llc-et-al-v-the-mystic-valley-development-commision-et-al/
_____________________________________________________________________
There was only a tiny mention of the lawsuit in the Medford Transcript. This was a huge story, but - allegedly - Nell Escobar Coakley is so conflicted that McGlynn is her alleged "editor"
Proof? Why did the Malden paper run with the big story? We challenge Nell Escobar Coakley at the Medford Transcript to show us the online stories of McGlynn's Disgrace at River's Edge, the old Telecom City!
_______________________________________________________________________
-
Jury awards $3.6M to River’s Edge parcel owner
- After being tied up in appeals court for years, a Middlesex County jury has ordered the Mystic Valley Development Commission to pay a Medford property owner $3.63 million, plus interest, for land taken in 2004 by eminent domain during the development of the River’s Edge project.
http://www.wickedlocal.com/article/20100805/News/308059255
__________________________________
Philanthropy Times
Researching those who do good throughout the world
Study Ranks Quality of Charity Markets Across Country
Posted on https://philanthropytimes.wordpress.com/________________________________
J.P. Noonan Transportation Penalized for 9,600-Gallon Oil Spill into the Mystic River in 2013
The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection has reached two settlements, totaling $55,100 and $7,187 respectively, with J.P. Noonan Transportation, Inc. of West Bridgewater for Natural Resource Damages (NRD) and Clean Water Act violations that resulted from a 9,600-gallon home-heating oil spill into the Mystic River on May 31, 2013.
The spill occurred on Route 60 in Arlington when an oil tanker truck crashed while going around a rotary on the Mystic Valley Parkway. As a result of the crash, the 10,000-gallon compartment of the tanker was breached, dumping nearly all of its contents onto the roadway, which then flowed into storm drains and subsequently into the nearby Mystic River. Emergency response crews from Arlington, Medford, other nearby towns, MassDEP and a private contractor hired by J.P. Noonan were able to contain and clean up virtually all of the oil that spilled during the ensuing days and weeks.
