Wednesday, September 16, 2015

Dave Adams not quite accurate take on the City Council

The Editor's response is first, followed by the rather skewed perception of Dave Adams
 ______________________________
Hello Dave (and Ken)

I actually try to attend every council meeting or watch them on TV and respectfully say that you don't have all the information to pass judgment on the rudeness.

Mr. Camuso intentionally antagonizes Mr. Penta, and it is well orchestrated between three councilors, the other two being Adam Knight and Fred Dello Russo Jr.

You will find all three - Dello Russo, Knight and Camuso - voting in unison, usually against Breanna Lungo-Koehn, Michael Marks and Bob Penta.

Again, this is from carefully watching how it unfolds week after week.

Mr. Penta was speaking on Ruth Balser's bill at the State House, Mr. Dello Russo was tearing up the bill, loudly, while Penta was speaking.   Knight always throws in a "point of information" disrupting a councilor, rudely, with Camuso giving a nod and saying "Good job."

The rudeness is there, it is orchestrated, and it is meant to disrupt Mr. Penta.

You have to watch carefully and study it, so when you admit that you don't watch week after week, you should be a bit more careful when accusing the victim of the orchestrated "rudeness."

As to the second part of your essay, as much as I like Chris D'Aveta as a person, he's part of the Democratic City and Ward Committee which works lockstep with the McGlynn Administration.  I personally like Neil Osborne yet his website notes "as well as serving on the City’s Community Development Board appointed by Mayor Michael MyGlynn. "

New faces like Leonore Eforo and Neil McSweeney along with Bill O'Keefe, Mark Crowley and incumbents Breanna Lungo-Koehn and Michael Marks, as well as school committee person John Falco, would be an interesting new city council free of the "rudeness" that currently exists solely because of three councilors, two running for reelection.

Respectfully,

Joe Viglione

 
Dave Adams
Sep 14 11:06 PM
On two of the topics mentioned, I would say:

* Rudeness: I don't watch or attend every council meeting, but those I have seen featured nastiness mainly between Bob Penta  and Paul Camuso, neither of whom are running for re-election. Perhaps there are other incumbents who also behave rudely, but I think we have an opportunity to improve the level of discourse simply based on the departures from the current council. 

* Voting for Individual candidates or slates: A group of three council candidates held a meet-and-greet evening a few nights ago, supporting each others' candidacies. Personally, I'm really excited by all three candidates: Neil Osborne, Chris D'Aveta, and John Falco. I'm told that these same candidates will hold another gathering in West Medford on October 2. Since 4 is a majority on the council, I wish there was a 4th candidate in the group, but I believe that all three of these candidates can work positively in concert with other council members no matter who else gets elected.

-- dga