of City of Medford for Perception of CONFLICT
The question arises whether lawyers can effectively and ethically represent opposite types of clients — for example, insurance carriers and insurance coverage plaintiffs. The ABA’s Rule of Professional Conduct 1.7 addresses this.
On the one hand, the rule sensibly says that a lawyer cannot serve two parties who are directly adverse in the same matter; it also bars representation “when there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer’s responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer.”
Yet, the rule also says that a lawyer may represent clients whose interests are opposite if the lawyer “will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client.”
https://nydailyrecord.com/2012/10/30/commentary-can-a-lawyer-represent-both-sides/
here's the evidence of conflict
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdIBJlksJJA
RUMLEY WITH MCGLYNN AND MUCCINI-BURKE IS LIKE THE BUSH FAMILY WITH BIN LADEN
here's the evidence of conflict
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdIBJlksJJA
RUMLEY WITH MCGLYNN AND MUCCINI-BURKE IS LIKE THE BUSH FAMILY WITH BIN LADEN
How about Bush and the Bin Laden family?
Bush claimed we’d bring back Osama bin Laden “dead or alive.” (It was Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton who got Bin Laden, not Bush!)
But the more we learn about the ties between the Bush family and the bin Ladens, questions like this one pop up: Did Bush really want to capture him?
