(apologies, I may not have "refreshed" the page earlier)
1,007,031 @ 3:59 pm
1,007,005 @ 3:00 pm
58 page views in 67 minutes
June 30, 2017
One Ashburton Place, Suite 601
Boston, MA 02108
RE: RETALIATION - Part 1 of 2
Viglione vs. City Of Medford, Council President Richard F. Caraviello, Mark Tonello, Edward P. Finn, Adam Knight, Frederick N. Dello Russo, Jr., Robert A. Maiocco, Paul Camuso
Public Accommodations Act Chapter Chapter 272, §98
Dear Assistant to the Chairman:
Pursuant to the MCAD’s victory Currier v. National Board of Medical Examiners, I would like to file a complaint with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination against Medford City Council President Richard F. Caraviello and the City of Medford for a violation of the Massachusetts Public Accommodations Act (“PAA”), Chapter 272, §98
This is one of two filings of “retaliation” which I intend to file with the MCAD. The second case is the malicious abuse of process which was Caraviello and the Commonwealth’s failed case against me, prevailing over Caraviello, the Medford Police and the Officer of the District Attorney on January 31, 2017.
I intend to file on all three entities in that separate case, as well as possibly other individuals.
This specific complaint is on the violation of Chapter 272 , §98
On or about March 28, 2017, two months after I prevailed over Mr. Caraviello’s false charges in Cambridge District Court, January 31, 2017, Mr. Caraviello refused to allow me to tape the Medford City Council on “Facebook Live.”
Mr. Caraviello asked me to stand near the window overlooking the left side of the building (or, if you are standing at the council, to the right of the city councilors, to the left of the attendees.) I complied with Mr. Caraviello. Furious that he had lost the court case in January, Caraviello blurted out “I’m calling the police anyway.” I had to leave as Mr. Caraviello had a Mark Tonello in the back of the auditorium ready, purportedly, to put an embarrassing moment on Facebook live.
A Medford attorney and a suspicious president of a 501c3 were escorted out by the police previously for being out of order.
Please note that. The citizens who are orderly, like myself, serve the public good.
By leaving I denied them the opportunity to abuse the public forum in a way that humiliates speakers (I am not the only one, they have many victims, one who asked for their resignation on June 27, 2017 at the council, former councilor Robert M. Penta.)
1)The city of Medford has no public access as the mayor, Stephanie Muccini-Burke, and her predecessor, Mayor Michael J. McGlynn, stomp on First Amendment rights. They willfully and maliciously keep the public out of public access television and have gone so far as to muddy the waters by allegedly putting the public monies into the Medford Vocational Technical school under the guise of “public access.”
2) My videos of the city council are of great public interest as you do not need a cable TV subscription to see the city council in action. This terrifies some on the city council who engage in stifling free speech, starting with President Caraviello and his accomplices, Councilor Frederick N. Dello Russo, Jr., and Councilor Adam Knight.
“However the judge ultimately found that, since there was no open investigation or court case occurring at the time that Caraviello alleged he was being intimidated by Viglione, the situation did not fit the definition of intimidating a witness, and the case was dismissed on Jan. 31.
You can find the link on Tiny URL / Caravielloabuseofcourt http://tinyurl.com/caravielloabuseofcourt
This from a police chief whose son, Joseph Sacco, was pulled over on or about January 23, 2017, his gun and truck removed from him, a relative driving Joe Sacco home, but no field sobriety test, no breathalyzer. His son walked while this writer, eight days later, was on trial for phony charges issued by Sacco’s police department.
“We’re in agreement with you” (that the judge gave me permission to exercise my right to the public accommodation) the Solicitor, Mark Rumley, turned beet red and was totally angry. My opinion is that they were trying to use the police to intimidate me to leave city hall, which Caraviello later did after he lost the case on March 28, 2017.
Caraviello also harassed my lawyer AFTER we won the court case, saying that this student of Christian Science, and senior citizen, needs to be “on medication.” Talk about retaliation, in writing, to the lawyer that beat Caraviello in a court of law. I have that document.
Date: Thursday, May 23, 2013, 5:27 PM
Paul A. Camuso
c/o Office of the City Solicitor
85 George P. Hassett Drive
Medford, MA 02155
Please be advised that I have filed, by hand and via certified mail, a complaint of Retaliation on you with La Donna Hatton and with Peter J. Koutoujian. This is retaliation alleged because of the public records request that I filed on you which you referenced as you, Mr. Dello Russo and your uncle, Robert Maiocco, were leaving Alden Chambers about 10:30 pm or so on May 21, 2013.
This is also a cease and desist. Please do not REFERENCE ME, do not look at me, do not interrupt me, do not say "hello" to me. Nothing. I would very much appreciate it if you leave the council when I am speaking as your alleged "Point of reference" comments have more to do with interruption of a citizen than they do of looking out for the consumers who pay outrageous cable TV bills.
Here are the reasons why you should leave the City Council when I'm speaking:
1)On a previous occasion you got up with fellow councilors and walked out on my speech. It was meant to be a slap in the face, that two city councilors being paid
$27,592.32 each and another councilor at $28,200.00 would be so disrespectful to the viewers and residents as to be disruptive.
2)On or about October of 2006 I had to file a police complaint on you for leaving the City Council (while on "company time") and running down the hallway of the first floor to catch up with me as I was walking to my car. That was sick. If you had something to say to me, you SHOULD have said it with some transparency - for the citizens to hear. What you did was sneaky, deceptive and frightening. You weighed well over 300 pounds at the time and were an intimidating figure in the dark.
3)On May 21, 2013, you pulled a similar stunt. After you made your parting comment, as I was loading expensive TV equipment and an expensive computer into my vehicle, you were driving the wrong way, blasting a horn at 10:30 PM at night, pointed at me in threatening fashion, and went speeding through a DO NOT ENTER sign in the City Hall parking lot with a reckless disregard for my personal safety.
Additionally, the Court rejected NBME’s no physical presence argument on the ground that it could not be absolved of liability