Letter about Roy E. Belson

680,425 @5:50 pm
680,112 @ 10:41 am
680,083@10:10 pm
319,888 TO ONE MILLION PAGE VIEWS



THE FULL STORY ON BELSON IS STILL BEING COMPOSED

APOLOGIES FOR THE DELAY BUT THERE ARE A LOT OF PROBLEMS WITH THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE EMBATTLED SUPERINTENDENT OF MEDFORD SCHOOLS 
                                ROY E. BELSON  

Sent 8:44 am April 19, 2016


School Committee
Medford city Hall
85 Geo P Hassett Drive
Medford MA 02155



Why did Superintendent Belson go to the news media on 11/3/15 on the lack of security at the McGlynn School instead of the day the theft happened, on or about October 30?

That was a dereliction of duty; that was a political stunt that threw public safety out the window to help enable a weak candidate like Muccini-Burke.  Let it out on election night, after the election, so as not to interfere with the election of a woman WRKO radio calls a "charlatan."


The story should have come out the day it happened.


Months later I tape a mini-documentary on no security at the high school while the superintendent and police chief are having a forum on...false bomb threats and public safety.  Months later Roy Belson still couldn't get it together, the "authorities" telling us they'll get it better "next time."  How many next time's does Roy Belson want?

How many opportunities to put our citizens at risk because Belson is incompetent and lazy, and the school committee, mostly (the old timers on the committee) do his bidding, not the other way around.
______________________________________________
Why did Mr. Belson choose not to tell a parent about her 15 year old son allegedly having an inappropriate relationship with Jenna Tarabelsi?

Because the untrustworthy Roy Belson was aiding and abetting his chosen candidate, Stephanie Muccini-Burke by not being forthright about the lack of security at the McGlynn School prior to the election.

Why did Belson have the name of a junior varsity head coach on the school website until my public records request alerted him to the fact that a teacher, no longer employed as of 6/30/15 still promoted to the public as being at the school.  Was this intentional?  Was it a coverup?

That teacher allegedly has a website offering "babysitting" services.

What 33 or so year old man does a job that teenage girls do for pocket change?

From the website:

"I've been working with children since I was 15 years old and am looking to work with children being a teacher in the future. I'm currently looking to baby sit for the summer or after school care and believe I can be a great help to a family nearby."

Here's a story the school committee needs to read

COVER-UP AT NJ HIGH SCHOOL
_____________________________________
New Jersey school sex scandal cover-up: 3 teachers, 2 administrators charged

At that moment, prosecutors say, a cover-up was put in motion that ultimately unraveled Thursday when DePaul, an assistant principal and three teachers were charged with offenses ranging from child endangerment to sexual assault and official misconduct.
 
_____________________________________
New Jersey school sex scandal cover-up: 3 teachers, 2 administrators charged


as the inaction by administrators who ignored policies and safeguards that were in place and instead allowed a culture "where teachers thought they could get away with improper relationships with their students," according to Faulk.

Prosecutors say the principal met with the student, who told her she'd been to one of the teacher's homes with a girl who was involved with him and had seen the explicit text messages. Authorities say DePaul asked her to write an account of what she had heard and that Assistant Principal Jernee Kollock stayed with the student to help her write the statement, even helping her with her grammar — but also making it seem less serious.

Around the same time, Faulk said, DePaul learned one of the teachers had driven an alleged victim and another student to Ocean City in violation of district policy. But, he said, the teacher was merely reprimanded.


http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2012/10/new_jersey_school_sex_scandal.html

__________________________________________


A suspended Plum Senior High School teacher charged with having sex with a student was held for trial Wednesday on a count of intimidating her through emails and a phone call despite a judge’s no-contact order.


http://www.post-gazette.com/local/east/2015/07/29/Plum-teacher-held-for-trial-on-second-set-of-charges-involving-female-student/stories/201507290182